- Joined
- 10 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 2,553
Interesting... I don't like the weird washed out look I've seen 6800xt's run on the same games - watched a review showing that and thought it was rather strange? I'm sure you could tweak the settings to balance it out but was rather weird imho.I've owned both, currently have a 3080 in my sons system. Given the choice between the two I'd pick the 6800XT for the extra vram and better image quality out of the box ( I've often got to play about with the filters on the 3080). It's also faster on the majority of games I play.
Both great cards though.
Yeah the 16gb was what original had sold me future proofing wise, but I really do like the RT at 60fps in 1440p/4k (on the less demanding games) the idea of DLSS for in a couple years when the 3080 requires it to hold 60-70 fps with eye candy on in SP games (as MP i'll just bang the settings down low to maintain 180hz with my 1440p monitor and tbf I'll probs be only playing old games by then MP wise if I'm bothered that much)As mentioned earlier, both cards have pros and cons. For me personally, I'd go for the 6800xt (or 7000 series equivalent) as I reckon the 16gb of vram would be more useful (future proof?). I also prefer the AMD software as the Nvidia version looks like something from the 90s. FSR and RSR cannot be ignored as well, I use these all the time and work very for me. But, the nvidia offerings have DLSS and hardware RT capabilities which cannot be ignored in this day and age.
I hear bad things about the amd software that it's very hit or miss? which is a shame as I do prefer amd over intel for example and always had more ati cards than nvidia back in the day...