Quote:
Originally Posted by cdb
Couple of questions on the folding side. Were all the ppds done with the 4 gpus and cpus all folding together?
Yes, the ppd on the graphs is from both CPUs and all four graphics cards.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdb
Did you try folding on just the cpus? I've seen someone say it's not worth gpu folding on the sr2 as you have to give them a core or 2 to work with and that takes a lot of points away from the cpu bigadv at those time frames. They were getting 130K just on the cpus. Any chance you could try folding with say just a 240gt fitted for graphics and fold only on the overclocked cpus to see if 130K is possible and what power this then uses, I'm guessing a good 450W less.
Yes, I did try with only the CPUs folding, with both the A3 and bigadv clients. In the end though, the ppd was so much higher with everything folding together, and I needed to prove whether the board can handle the load (I/O, power and heat), I only graphed the total ppd.
However, from my notepad:
CPUs at 2.66GHz running one bigadv client (=50k ppd ) + 4 graphics cards (=40k ppd), total 90k ppd @ 862W
CPUs at 2.66GHz running one bigadv client (=67k ppd), total 67k ppd @ 537W
So, it looks like folding with the GPUs drops about 17k ppd from the CPU client, but adds 40k ppd, a net gain of 23k ppd.
Using some pretty crude maths, I'd therefore guestimate that the overclocked X5650s would yield about 101k ppd and the overclocked X5680s about 110k ppd.