I think you're right but genuinely interested how that law works/is justifiable as I can't think of any other precedent where you are still accountable to UK law outside of its bounds of jurisdiction.
Market abuse and money laundering laws, IIRC?
I think you're right but genuinely interested how that law works/is justifiable as I can't think of any other precedent where you are still accountable to UK law outside of its bounds of jurisdiction.
I don't know, you tell me, hence the "?"![]()
Market abuse and money laundering laws, IIRC?
But aren't they more international laws where all the countries enforce the same law in mutual agreement?
Why are various news outlets reporting he had contact with a 13 year old girl?
Did he say "I'm in" ?
I wonder if he pulled out later?![]()
Well clearly not because it would be absurd and my dad would have been arrested at the airport when he bought me a beer in Mallorca when I was 17 all those years ago.
I really don't like that awful grey area that seems to exist for girls between 13 and 16 in the UK, to me me it sends very mixed and bad messages. This case specifically, a 50-something with a 13 year old sounds very creepy and very wrong.
Bit shocked to read he has been cleared, with no sentence and presumably nothing going on record.
If the girl had been under 13, legally she would have been deemed too young to give consent to have sex, Doug Richard would then have been convicted of at least statutory rape.
If you showed the court a road sign saying "50', or there was no road sign saying "30" when going from the 50-30 and it wasn't obviously a 30 then you'd probably get quite a long way.
I really don't like that awful grey area that seems to exist for girls between 13 and 16 in the UK, to me me it sends very mixed and bad messages. This case specifically, a 50-something with a 13 year old sounds very creepy and very wrong.
What's the mans age got to do with it? It's no different if the man was 18 or 50. If you sleep with a 13 year old girl it's illeagal.
So you think it is just as normal for an 18 year old man to be attracted to and have sex with someone 13, as if the man like in this specific case was over 50? The vast difference in age in the latter is more concerning for me and should have a harsher punishment, if convicted.
Not surprised he was found "Not guilty" as they could not prove beyond reasonable doubt. However, the events that occurred sound dubious in the extreme.
An absolute joke he's got away scot free.
The married dad-of-three met the 13-year-old through a free-to-join American website, called 'Seeking Arrangements', where she had advertised herself as a 'sugar baby' after claiming to be at least 18.
The Law said:If you reasonably believe the person is 16-years-old or over then you have a defence.
If the defendant thought she was 16 with any reasonable belief then he or she is not guilty.