Former Dragons' Den star Doug Richard 'paid a 13-year-old schoolgirl hundreds of pounds for sex'

Soldato
Joined
8 Mar 2007
Posts
10,938
I'm weird for not fancying children? OK mate.

If you're claiming your attraction levels are based purely on the human construct of age which for you just so happens to coincidently fall in line with what society has deemed 'legal' and not any kind of biological process that has driven human desire since we evolved from fish
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Feb 2006
Posts
29,263
Location
Cornwall
Agreed! It's not paedophilia not even close.

Pretty sure some people don't know what the word means. Sex with a minor may or may not also be paedophilia, but in the case of a /1516 year old, almost certainly isn't.

It's also possible for a 13 year old and a 16 year old to be indistinguishable. Still, always best to check the passport and get consent forms signed in triplicate ;)

It doesn't matter anyhow. Enough people here on GD have determined his guilt for a trial to be absolutely unnecessary now :p
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
28,166
Location
London
As a friend pointed out, looks tricky to send him down on the underage charges beyond reasonable doubt (e.g. site if for over 18s, after school could be 6th form).
 
Caporegime
Joined
25 Jul 2005
Posts
28,851
Location
Canada
that doesn't have much to do with the legality of it - famous person paying for sex with someone above 18 is still news for tabloids even when perfectly legal

you could say it is related to the morality of it... but really it is just something that makes the story/gossip a bit saucier

But the point was, acoreing to your definition of "paying for sex" it doesn't look like he actually did. it was certainly used to make the story saucier, it is the daily mail after all, fact and impartial reporting isn't particularly important. :p

Anyway, enough of that. :)
 
Caporegime
Joined
25 Jul 2005
Posts
28,851
Location
Canada
I'm weird for not fancying children? OK mate.

Biologically they aren't children though. In modern society they are seen as children but that changes depending on society and current feeling in that society. "Children" have been getting older and older through time even though, ironically, biological maturity has been reducing over time (children are hitting puberty younger now than ever before).

You'll find most factors bred into men over thousands of years for attraction are pretty much at their peak with late teens, because as already said women are at their most fertile there.

That said, finding someone attractive and acting on that attraction are two different things. It is weird that a 50+ year old would meet up with a couple of "16 and 17" year olds in current society and I doubt many on here would disagree.
 
Caporegime
Joined
13 Jan 2010
Posts
32,677
Location
Llaneirwg
Our line in the sand is 16, I think Brazil is much lower. He should have just gone to one of these countries . Would have been much easier

As the the right or wrong
It's one of those tricky things.
Not many years ago it would have not been seen as wrong at all.. Especially if both consenting.

It's just seen as 'wrong' due to our culture and that 16 here has been defined as an age most appropriate to not make everyone a 'nonce' but also to cover the 'of sound mind' criteria
Obviously everyone matures differently

Still, you know the law, so it's not am excuse

Ill wrap this up by qualifying I wouldn't go anywhere near even as low as 16..more that have you seen 16yos than its the law!


Genuine lols on the "I'm in" post on page 1!
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Feb 2006
Posts
29,263
Location
Cornwall
Our line in the sand is 16, I think Brazil is much lower. He should have just gone to one of these countries . Would have been much easier

Forgive me if I'm wrong, but our age of consent laws make it illegal (for a Brit) to go to another country (with lower consenting age) to have sex there.

So regardless, if you're British the minimum age is 16+... worldwide.

Haven't there been prosecutions of Brits who go abroad for these purposes? I'm sure there have.

e: confirmed:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...ts-face-UK-prosecution-over-abuse-abroad.html

e2: The US has the same law.
 
Last edited:
Caporegime
OP
Joined
29 Jan 2008
Posts
58,931
But the point was, acoreing to your definition of "paying for sex" it doesn't look like he actually did. it was certainly used to make the story saucier, it is the daily mail after all, fact and impartial reporting isn't particularly important. :p

Anyway, enough of that. :)

He quite clearly paid for sex(in the same way as anyone paying for an escort's 'time' has), whether he'd be convicted if paying for sex was illegal is another matter... we don't know for sure and I've answered that twice already. I'll point out again that it isn't illegal and I'm still not sure why you keep banging on about it?
 
Caporegime
OP
Joined
29 Jan 2008
Posts
58,931
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but our age of consent laws make it illegal (for a Brit) to go to another country (with lower consenting age) to have sex there.

So regardless, if you're British the minimum age is 16+... worldwide.

Haven't there been prosecutions of Brits who go abroad for these purposes? I'm sure there have.

e: confirmed:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...ts-face-UK-prosecution-over-abuse-abroad.html

e2: The US has the same law.

Now that is interesting, maybe something his UK lawyers haven't considered. If he believed they were at least 16 (rather than 18) - could he potentially be in trouble under US law where 18 is usually the limit?
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Feb 2006
Posts
29,263
Location
Cornwall
Now that is interesting, maybe something his UK lawyers haven't considered. If he believed they were at least 16 (rather than 18) - could he potentially be in trouble under US law where 18 is usually the limit?

It's a federal law, and prohibits sex with persons under 16 worldwide. State law decides the age of consent inside the US (but it must be 16+ to comply with federal law).
 
Caporegime
Joined
13 Jan 2010
Posts
32,677
Location
Llaneirwg
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but our age of consent laws make it illegal (for a Brit) to go to another country (with lower consenting age) to have sex there.

So regardless, if you're British the minimum age is 16+... worldwide.

Haven't there been prosecutions of Brits who go abroad for these purposes? I'm sure there have.

e: confirmed:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...ts-face-UK-prosecution-over-abuse-abroad.html

e2: The US has the same law.

Didn't know that!
 
Soldato
Joined
8 Mar 2007
Posts
10,938
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but our age of consent laws make it illegal (for a Brit) to go to another country (with lower consenting age) to have sex there.

I think you're right but genuinely interested how that law works/is justifiable as I can't think of any other precedent where you are still accountable to UK law outside of its bounds of jurisdiction.

Don't get it twisted, I'm glad an exception is made for that kind of crime but don't understand how it works. If you are no longer on British soil, then how can you be bound by any of its laws or charged for any crime outside its jurisdiction?
 
Soldato
Joined
30 Apr 2006
Posts
17,990
Location
London
I think you're right but genuinely interested how that law works/is justifiable as I can't think of any other precedent where you are still accountable to UK law outside of its bounds of jurisdiction.

Don't get it twisted, I'm glad an exception is made for that kind of crime but don't understand how it works. If you are no longer on British soil, then how can you be bound by any of its laws or charged for any crime outside its jurisdiction?

I think because you're a British Citizen and therefore bound to it laws?
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Feb 2006
Posts
29,263
Location
Cornwall
Don't get it twisted, I'm glad an exception is made for that kind of crime but don't understand how it works. If you are no longer on British soil, then how can you be bound by any of its laws or charged for any crime outside its jurisdiction?

I didn't think this was the only area where Brits overseas were still governed by British law; unfortunately I can't remember what the other areas are and Google isn't helping :p

I don't think it's just this one issue tho.
 
Soldato
Joined
8 Mar 2007
Posts
10,938
I think because you're a British Citizen and therefore bound to it laws?

So any Brit who goes to America and buys a gun is breaking the law? Any Brit who drives on an Autobahn over 70 mph is breaking the law? Any Brit who sets up a bar in Spain where the drinking age is 16 and sells beer to 17 year olds is breaking the law?
 
Caporegime
OP
Joined
29 Jan 2008
Posts
58,931
So any Brit who goes to America and buys a gun is breaking the law? Any Brit who drives on an Autobahn over 70 mph is breaking the law? Any Brit who sets up a bar in Spain where the drinking age is 16 and sells beer to 17 year olds is breaking the law?

nah - AFAIK this was specific legislation introduced so that British nonces going to the far east could still be prosecuted over here
 
Soldato
Joined
30 Apr 2006
Posts
17,990
Location
London
So any Brit who goes to America and buys a gun is breaking the law? Any Brit who drives on an Autobahn over 70 mph is breaking the law? Any Brit who sets up a bar in Spain where the drinking age is 16 and sells beer to 17 year olds is breaking the law?

I don't know, you tell me, hence the "?" :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top Bottom