who mentioned urban foxes... I wouldn't use a firearm in a built up area myself, as it is I have a reasonably large piece of private land where I frequently walk about with my rifle.Borris said:Shooting an urban fox is just unneccesary though.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc608/fc608ab6e6dc2469165c10f9a8cb020731d10c69" alt="Smile :) :)"
who mentioned urban foxes... I wouldn't use a firearm in a built up area myself, as it is I have a reasonably large piece of private land where I frequently walk about with my rifle.Borris said:Shooting an urban fox is just unneccesary though.
Yeah, you keep telling yourself that...Nana said:And if I see a fox, it is a perfectly valid target.
phykell said:Yeah, you keep telling yourself that...
Mickey_D said:In the case of a fox, it's called preventative measures. It's not a case of IF it will become a problem that will require disposing of the animal, but WHEN. It is far easier to dispose of it when you see it than it is to try and track it down after it has already destroyed an entire hen house, killed your cat, gotten jiggy with your dog (leaving it mentally unstable for the rest of its life), and dug a trench under your "security fence", leaving you with several thousand quid worth of damage that you KNOW it will return and repeat as soon as you've fixed everything.
So yes, when you see one in the proximity to your property, it IS a valid target. Just like coyotes, wild dogs, crows/ravens are around here.
I don't need to because not being a towny I *know* that foxes NEED killing.phykell said:Yeah, you keep telling yourself that...
Balddog said:Once again im surprised by Nanas opinion on thisI really should stop pigeon holing people.
Oh yes, that arcane knowledge that "townies" can't ever comprehend.Nana said:I don't need to because not being a towny I *know* that foxes NEED killing.
it is our innate aggression and violence that has meant our survival as a species. At least I am human enough to recognise and enjoy my more basic urges.phykell said:Oh yes, that arcane knowledge that "townies" can't eever comprehend.
There's just no way around it, people like killing animals for fun which explains quite a lot really.
It is our compassion and respect for life which have made our societies successful. At least I am human enough to respect life in all forms and to ignore my more basic urges.Nana said:it is our innate aggression and violence that has meant our survival as a species. At least I am human enough to recognise and enjoy my more basic urges.
sorry but that is complete tosh. Specifically OUR societies are still around because we developed nuclear weapons first... modern human societies exist because we killed all opposition, not because we embraced it.phykell said:It is our compassion and respect for life which has made our societies successful.
or perhaps lacking in humanity and are a product of conurbations?At least I am human enough to respect life in all forms and to ignore my more basic urges.
tell that to the neanderthalsYour "innate aggression and violence" as you put it, are holding the human race back.
you have never eaten a fish that you caught 2 minutes beforehand. You've never had to hunt to eat, you've probably never shot and then skinned 4 rabbits and made possibly the most delicious stew ever, so you are not in a position to comment as your viewpoint stems from ignorance, sentimental ignorance for sure but ignorance nonetheless, but I recognise the foundation of our survival has been our ability to hunt and gather and our ability to kill everything which opposes us, from bears and wolves to other humans. You will never understand the security that the knowledge of guaranteed survival gives one.Can you kindly explain to me why I feel no need or urge to kill small , defencless animals? Is it the same reason that I never wanted to go to football matches for fights? I wonder if the people who do enjoy fighting at football matches use the same excuse that you do, that they are simply enjoying their more basic urges...
Specifically OUR societies are still around DESPITE the fact we developed nuclear weapons first... modern human societies exist DESPITE the fact we killed all opposition and who knows what it could have been if we had embraced it.Nana said:sorry but that is complete tosh. Specifically OUR societies are still around because we developed nuclear weapons first... modern human societies exist because we killed all opposition, not because we embraced it.
Your assumptions are becoming tiresome. Just because I don't share your love of killing defenceless animals doesn't mean I'm necessarily what people like you love to dismiss as a "townie".Nana said:...or perhaps lacking in humanity and are a product of conurbations?
You don't even know me. How can YOU tell me where I live, what I know, what I've done and what I haven't? And then you have the nerve to tell me I'm being ignorant. The irony! I've never heard such a load of presumptious, ignorant rhetoric! You can say what you want but your attitude in this thread betrays the fact that you actually enjoy killing animals. Think what you will, that disgusts me.Nana said:you have never eaten a fish that you caught 2 minutes beforehand. You've never had to hunt to eat, you've probably never shot and then skinned 4 rabbits and made possibly the most delicious stew ever, so you are not in a position to comment as your viewpoint stems from ignorance, sentimental ignorance for sure but ignorance nonetheless, but I recognise the foundation of our survival has been our ability to hunt and gather and our ability to kill everything which opposes us, from bears and wolves to other humans. You will never understand the security that the knowledge of guaranteed survival gives one.
paul8811 said:Anyone else have a Fox camped outside there bedroom window making horrible horrible noise all night long till 6am![]()
How can I get rid of the pesky git!!
Nana said:it is our innate aggression and violence that has meant our survival as a species. At least I am human enough to recognise and enjoy my more basic urges.
I strongly disagree with you, and we will have to agree to disagree.phykell said:Specifically OUR societies are still around DESPITE the fact we developed nuclear weapons first... modern human societies exist DESPITE the fact we killed all opposition and who knows what it could have been if we had embraced it.
ok, where do you live?Your assumptions are becoming tiresome. Just because I don't share your love of killing defenceless animals doesn't mean I'm necessarily what people like you love to dismiss as a "townie".
well you are prepared to criticise my decisions without any knowledge of me... so I feel my comments are not out of line.You don't even know me. How can YOU tell me where I live, what I know, what I've done and what I haven't? And then you have the nerve to tell me I'm being ignorant. The irony! I've never heard such a load of presumptious, ignorant rhetoric! You can say what you want but your attitude in this thread betrays the fact that you actually enjoy killing animals. Think what you will, that disgusts me.
are you actually comparing hunting for food, to rape?dirtydog said:I think rapists do that too, but it doesn't make it acceptable...
Nana said:are you actually comparing hunting for food, to rape?
no I didn't. I justified my enjoyment of hunting as it satisfies one of my basic human urges. ergo, reaffirming my humanity, whereas rape, isnt exactly representative of nhumanity, and it certainly isn't a foundation of our survival.dirtydog said:I'm comparing people enjoying their basic urges to rape. You said that if something is a basic human urge then it is therefore automatically okay to do it.
No we won't, can't you debate this? Can you tell me what place violence has in a society? Do you not believe that our society could have got to where it is a little quicker had it not been for our violence? Do you not believe that violence and a lack of compassion are indications of a lack of advancement? As I said, we are where we are despite our violent past, not because of it.Nana said:I strongly disagree with you, and we will have to agree to disagree.
What? you don't want to know where I was born, where and how I grew up, etc. You can base your opinion solely on where I live now?Nana said:ok, where do you live?
Wrong. I'm criticising your "decisions" based on what you've written in this thread and on my personal respect for all life.Nana said:well you are prepared to criticise my decisions without any knowledge of me... so I feel my comments are not out of line.
Why should I? Why should membership of your "club" qualify my opinion? your "argument", such as it is, seems to rely on attacking the poster. How about concentrating on what you do know rather than making wild accusations about me?Nana said:Have you eaten food you've killed? why not instead of just being ultra defensive you actually post some of your experiences so I can retract my accusation of ignorance.