Poll: French Grand Prix 2021, Paul Ricard - Race 7/23

Rate the French Grand Prix 2021 out of ten


  • Total voters
    77
  • Poll closed .
It wasn't that long ago that Max earned himself the "Crashstappen" tag. He crashed so much that he threatened to headbutt the next journalist that asked him about it, people made "has Max crashed yet" websites about him, and he threw away good results with stupid mistakes like tangling with Ocon. I'd say he's got better since then, but it's only really last season and this that he's really got it together. We'll see how he holds that up across a season where he's got the chance at a championship.



So have dozens of drivers over the years; most of them don't go on to become "one of the best ever". Has Max shown he's a good driver? Yes. Has he shown he's "one of the best ever"? Not even close to it.

It's almost like a 23 year old F1 driver might be completely improved from when they were a 17 year old driver which is what you are referring to. Max was a raw talent at 17 and boy has he improved massively over the years. He's in the top two drivers on the grid right now, very difficult to choose between him and Lewis. Both of them deserve every bit of praise for their ability. two exceptional drivers anyone complaining about that does not understand F1.
 
It's almost like a 23 year old F1 driver might be completely improved from when they were a 17 year old driver which is what you are referring to. Max was a raw talent at 17 and boy has he improved massively over the years. He's in the top two drivers on the grid right now, very difficult to choose between him and Lewis. Both of them deserve every bit of praise for their ability. two exceptional drivers anyone complaining about that does not understand F1.

Max is excellent.. but exceptional? LeClerc, Russell much more dominant in F2 and F3, Norris also... I would not say Max has faced any exceptional team mates like Lewis has (Sainz aside)... Lewis has had Rosberg, Button and Alonso... 3 WDCs (yes he has had lesser team mates too)
 
It's almost like a 23 year old F1 driver might be completely improved from when they were a 17 year old driver which is what you are referring to. Max was a raw talent at 17 and boy has he improved massively over the years.

Yes, he has. But you talked about "the last few years" and how he's "destroyed his team mates year after year"; neither are true. Really apart from this years, and last, Max has seemed like a driver with raw talent rather than anything approaching a rounded driver. To be fair, his development was rushed and that probably contributed to his ropey opening years but he certainly failed to achieve anything like the impact that Hamilton and, I would say, Leclerc did in their first few seasons.

He's in the top two drivers on the grid right now, very difficult to choose between him and Lewis. Both of them deserve every bit of praise for their ability. two exceptional drivers anyone complaining about that does not understand F1.

I totally agree Max is one of the top two drivers on the grid right now; but there's a massive gulf between that impression and "being one of the best ever". If Max is to go down in history as one of the greats - like Lewis unquestionably will - he needs to deliver over a career. It doesn't make sense to talk about a very exciting young driver like Max as if they're storied great of the sport. Yet.
 
or if you haven't won a world championship then you can't be up there labelled as one of the best drivers. Completely deluded and the Lewis bias is obvious.
lol and the Max bias? Are you mental? By what measure can you possibly judge a formula 1 driver if not by championships won? Absolutely lols... Max has won 0 championships and Lewis has won 7. End of story. You can talk about Max's potential until the cows come home but beyond his performance over the last couple of years he barely deserves mentioning in the same breath as Lewis, Senna, Schumacher, Alonso, Vettel etc. Because the difference is they have all won championships. I've never denied Max is a great driver right now, but that's where the comparison ends, imo.

I totally agree Max is one of the top two drivers on the grid right now; but there's a massive gulf between that impression and "being one of the best ever". If Max is to go down in history as one of the greats - like Lewis unquestionably will - he needs to deliver over a career. It doesn't make sense to talk about a very exciting young driver like Max as if they're storied great of the sport. Yet.
Exactly.
 
People are so desperate to see Lewis fail they talk up any opposition. Like him or not, Lewis is a helluva talent and a MACHINE. This is all very much like people complaining about The Michael and Lewis and him are very different in HOW they go about winning
 
lol and the Max bias? Are you mental? By what measure can you possibly judge a formula 1 driver if not by championships won? Absolutely lols... Max has won 0 championships and Lewis has won 7. End of story. You can talk about Max's potential until the cows come home but beyond his performance over the last couple of years he barely deserves mentioning in the same breath as Lewis, Senna, Schumacher, Alonso, Vettel etc. Because the difference is they have all won championships. .

Yeah.... you still don't get it. It's like saying Kane can't be a great player because he's not won anything with Spurs.
 
Max right now is like Kimi was back in '03. Back then you'd look at Kimi coming within a gnat's whisker of beating the greatest champion of his age over a season with the third best car on the grid, and talk about he was set to be one of the greatest of all time. He didn't. Like so many other really promising young drivers, he turned out to be merely good. That Max is good is clear; whether he has what it takes to be a true great remains to be seen. Anything else is just froth and wishful thinking, at best.
 
Max right now is like Kimi was back in '03. Back then you'd look at Kimi coming within a gnat's whisker of beating the greatest champion of his age over a season with the third best car on the grid, and talk about he was set to be one of the greatest of all time. He didn't. Like so many other really promising young drivers, he turned out to be merely good. That Max is good is clear; whether he has what it takes to be a true great remains to be seen. Anything else is just froth and wishful thinking, at best.

Eh? So if he comes 2nd in the championship for the next 10 years but loses out due to having bad luck/bad car etc he will never be a great driver... Utter rubbish
 
Max right now is like Kimi was back in '03. Back then you'd look at Kimi coming within a gnat's whisker of beating the greatest champion of his age over a season with the third best car on the grid, and talk about he was set to be one of the greatest of all time. He didn't. Like so many other really promising young drivers, he turned out to be merely good. That Max is good is clear; whether he has what it takes to be a true great remains to be seen. Anything else is just froth and wishful thinking, at best.

Can I just disagree with the 3rd best car there.... You're saying the Williams BMW was 2nd best?
 
Knew I was hazey on the details, but I got the jist! In fairness, I spent most of the weekend intoxicated each time I've been :p
To be fair he was at Silverstone three years on the bounce, two during the F1 support races. Two races in F2 in 2017 (1st and 5th), two in GP3 (at the time) in 2016 (2nd and 3rd) and two in European F3 in 2015 (12th, 2nd and 1st).

History is usually cruel, if he doesn't win at least one championship he will all but be forgotten.
Sir Stirling Moss didn't fair too badly in people's memory.
 
Last edited:
I'll throw out Ronnie Peterson but I think I'm going to struggle after that!

There are a few semi-famous names currently (eg Coulthard) but they don't exactly ooze charisma or have star quality to capture the hearts like some others did and will likely be never enter. Alesi should have made it onto such a hypothetical list though and might have done bar some awful luck.



I suppose the other way of looking at it is how many champions have been forgotten or will be forgotten? How many could name the year Denny Hulme was champion unless they looked it up (or played Grand Prix Legends)? What about Phil Hill? Damon Hill or Nico Rosberg might only be remembered as sons of champions in another 50+ years rather than for their characters or on-track accomplishments.
 
Well at least that comment brought the die hards into the conversation :p

I'd argue until your name is known outside of the fans circle for the right reasons then you haven't really made it into the greats, but that will go down like a **** sandwich in here :D
 
Back
Top Bottom