Much better move than a 780 mate!
Cheaper than a 780 too if you paid £510 minus postage.
Providing you dont mind the extra on the leccy bill
That's fab bang for buck though if you've got the right mobo, PSU and case to squeeze them in.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Much better move than a 780 mate!
Cheaper than a 780 too if you paid £510 minus postage.
^^ Some places may have 780's for under £500 then, really isn't that bad for a launch price of a new flagship Nvidia card. To expensive for moi but I'm sure these they will sell a ton of these @ £500.
...except that they at replacing cards of the wrong teirs and artificially inflating prices. GTX770 replacing GTX680 at the same price point (according to Gibbo)? That's just pretty much straight rebadging plus factory overclock...
Won't be under 500 pounds.. graphics cards always cost more in the UK compared to other EU countries. If its typical price is 599 euro it will be around 550 pounds (~640 euro)
The 770 replaces the 670. In performance terms it replaces the 680 but hierarchically it replaces the 670 as the second highest spec part.
Hierarchy wise the 770 replaces the 680 and the 760 replaces the 670, the 780 is a new tier in the hierarchy.
Actually if you actually read my posts in the previous pages, I've been saying all along that the 770 should be replacing 670, not the 680...but ubersonic pointed out that Nvidia is insisting the 770 is replacement for 680, and the the 780 is a "new tier" on its own which IMO is BS, considering it is only marginal faster than "last gen's" GTX680. When they are trying to replace a x80 teir with a x70, they are just trying to find an excuse to inflat the price of their products. The 770 should really be coming in at 670's price, not the 680's. Gibbo has already confirmed that the 770 is gonna be at 680's price range, so that's £360-£400 ish, which was higher than 670's launch price.I'm not sure which part of "comparing performance only" you don't understand. I'm well aware of the cost side of things.
As the 670 was so close to the 680 the 770 was never likely to be much faster than a 670 IMO. The 770 replaces the 670. In performance terms it replaces the 680 but hierarchically it replaces the 670 as the second highest spec part. Prices won't be too dissimilar to 670 launch prices by the looks of things.
Actually if you actually read my posts in the previous pages, I've been saying all along that the 770 should be replacing 670, not the 680...but ubersonic pointed out that Nvidia is insisting the 770 is replacement for 680, and the the 780 is a "new tier" on its own which IMO is BS, considering it is only marginal faster than "last gen's" GTX680. When they are trying to replace a x80 teir with a x70, they are just trying to find an excuse to inflat the price of their products. The 770 should really be coming in at 670's price, not the 680's. Gibbo has already confirmed that the 770 is gonna be at 680's price range, so that's £360-£400 ish, which was higher than 670's launch price.