Soldato
- Joined
- 8 Jun 2018
- Posts
- 2,827
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I pre-ordered 2 2080 Tis and I won’t be touching raytracing with a barge pole.
My goal is max settings in 4K at 60+ FPS.
Raytracing might be great, but not good enough to sacrifice 4K and settle for 1080p.
Just like they did with PhysX.
This guy reckons the rtx on\off demo was slightly skewed to make rtx on look better.
Smoke and mirrors..... Literally this timeJust like they did with PhysX.
Are you trying to say his whole post. Makes. No. Sense?It makes no sense to you because you don't get Ray Tracing. Some people have been looking for this technology for years. And been able to play a game at 1080p with Real time Ray Tracing is like a dream for them. There are also people out there who are mad keen to try out this technology and render their own scenes, games whatever using the new hardware available and those people are like kids in a candy shop.
And, why would it drive the company to the ground? This the first generation in a tech that's truly ground breaking. Even if it's just getting developers onboard for the second generation, it had to happen sometime. And look at it this way, those people who love to get onboard early and pay the early adopter tax, they are paving the way for the rest of us. It means when we get on board there will be a plentiful supply of games and all the first generations bugs will be sorted out.
I won't be buying one, because I think the price is ridiculous. But, I am not blind to how big a step forward this is.
I pre-ordered 2 2080 Tis and I won’t be touching raytracing with a barge pole.
My goal is max settings in 4K at 60+ FPS.
Raytracing might be great, but not good enough to sacrifice 4K and settle for 1080p.
You've probably gone overboard for 60fps 4K, I'd expect one to manage that (or 144 fps 1440p). A 1080Ti pretty much does already.
No it doesn't. How many times does this have to be said? For the last year people have been complaining 1080ti does not do 4k @ 60fps - even Nvidia acknowledge that. This is why the 2080 is being heralded as the first GPUs to bring true 4k @ 60 fps.You've probably gone overboard for 60fps 4K, I'd expect one to manage that (or 144 fps 1440p). A 1080Ti pretty much does already.
I pre-ordered 2 2080 Tis and I won’t be touching raytracing with a barge pole.
My goal is max settings in 4K at 60+ FPS.
Raytracing might be great, but not good enough to sacrifice 4K and settle for 1080p.
No it doesn't. How many times does this have to be said? For the last year people have been complaining 1080ti does not do 4k @ 60fps - even Nvidia acknowledge that. This is why the 2080 is being heralded as the first GPUs to bring true 4k @ 60 fps.
You have a link to a tiny sample of games of which many do not achieve 60fps. The 2080Ti is expected to be 40%+ improvement on 1080ti just from Cuda core increase and gddr6 alone - probably much more with dlss support - it will eat 4k alive if it is.It does in a lot of games and isn't far off in others:
https://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/1939
My point was that a single 2080Ti which should be 20% faster without taking advantage of it's new features will. Ray tracing won't be running at 60fps in many games @4K for another 2 GPU generations or more given Nvidia's current trajectory. AMD might have something better coming, and in 2020 intel will be joining in as well (And I will be very surprised if they aren't doing ray tracing)
I think this is unlikely otherwise we would have seen benchmarks alreadyYou have a link to a tiny sample of games of which many do not achieve 60fps. The 2080Ti is expected to be 40%+ improvement on 1080ti just from Cuda core increase and gddr6 alone - probably much more with dlss support - it will eat 4k alive if it is.