Poll: General election voting round 5 (final one)

Voting intentions in the General Election?

  • Alliance Party of Northern Ireland

    Votes: 3 0.3%
  • Conservative

    Votes: 403 42.2%
  • Democratic Unionist Party

    Votes: 2 0.2%
  • Green Party

    Votes: 59 6.2%
  • Labour

    Votes: 176 18.4%
  • Liberal Democrats

    Votes: 67 7.0%
  • Not voting/will spoil ballot

    Votes: 42 4.4%
  • Other party (not named)

    Votes: 8 0.8%
  • Plaid Cymru

    Votes: 1 0.1%
  • Respect Party

    Votes: 1 0.1%
  • Scottish National Party

    Votes: 37 3.9%
  • Social Democratic and Labour Party

    Votes: 1 0.1%
  • Sinn Fein

    Votes: 2 0.2%
  • UKIP

    Votes: 154 16.1%

  • Total voters
    956
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Nationwide party preference isn't the same as constituency voting with the incumbency effect/named candidate on the ballot/etc.
It's quite sad really. Whatever happened to the ideal that areas all around the UK choose a trusted person to go to Westminster and represent the views and concerns of the majority of the people they live with. Somewhere along the line MPs stopped being representatives of their local area and we've ended up with a party systems where people tend to vote for a party because "My family always have voted for X", "Anyone other than <insert demonized party of the year here>" or just "Vote for the least bad of the bunch".

As much as I dislike what the SNP want to do for the UK I can't help but admire their premise of unreservedly trying to do what they think is best for their constituents. Nicola Sturgeon would make a fine Prime Minister if you could just copy replace the word "Scotland" with "United Kingdom". A little bit left of centre for my normal political leaning but I've got a lot of time for a politician who is very open in saying "this is what i believe and will do".
 
From the myriad other ways parties get their message across.

But its the most engaging way to literally stand in front of people. So you want to force them to retreat back to sanitised stuff such as Tv studios and twitter and not engage the public.
Yet at the same time you accuse them of being remote.

So which way is it, engage directly or not and be accused of being corporate
 
Boris Johnson

"It’s the smugness that gets me. It’s the brass-necked complacency. As a piece of premature chicken-counting combined with insolent disrespect to the will of the electorate, this Labour stunt is frankly unbeatable.


Never mind measuring the curtains for Downing Street, Ed Miliband is so confident of victory this Thursday that he has already commissioned a vast monument to himself. He has caused a stonemason to engrave an 8ft 6in slab of limestone with a series of fine-sounding but essentially vacuous slogans, as if this were East Germany circa 1973, and he has promised – nay, sworn – that on the very first day of his regime the work will be religiously installed in the garden of the prime minister’s offices.

In true totalitarian fashion, he has signed it himself, and appended the red-rose Socialist logo of the Labour Party.

When someone showed me a pic of Ed in front of this absurdity, I thought it was a joke, some photoshopped wheeze.

It is no joke, my friends. This thing exists, and Ed fully intends that this tasteless, verbless, truthless stele should loom over No 10 like some kitsch version of the laws of Hammurabi, or some new Decalogue – except that he couldn’t think of 10 things to say.

What was he drinking? What was he smoking? What was he on when he came up with this one? Keep taking the tablets, Ed – don’t erect them in government offices. There are all sorts of people who are capable of putting a stop to this vandalism. If (heaven forfend) Ed Miliband were indeed to find himself in Downing Street this week, then the head of the Civil Service would quietly tell him not to be such a confounded idiot. No 10 is a department of state; you can’t use it for party-political propaganda. Imagine the hoo-ha if I had festooned City Hall with the Conservative logo, after we kicked out the Labour administration in 2008.

Then there is Westminster Council, for whose punctilious planning department I have deep respect. No 10 is a Grade I-listed building. Would they allow it to be desecrated with some weird commie slab? No way.

But there is another far more important person who can kibosh the whole thing – and that, of course, is you: you, the dear, the gentle, the reader who has already put up with so much election coverage and who is now about to take centre stage.

You can stop Ed and his monument; you can stop him stone dead. After all the yarping and the carping from the media and the politicos, it is time for you to have your say; and on Thursday you have a decision-making tool more powerful than 100 TV studios or a million barrels of newspaper ink. You have the stubby pencil and the bit of paper, and you hold the destiny of the country in your hands.

It will take only 23 more seats to give the Conservatives the stability of an absolute majority – something that is now completely beyond the reach of the Labour Party. So wherever you are voting, I hope you will consider why Ed Miliband reached for this preposterous gimmick. Why carve slogans in stone? Why pretend that there is something imperishable about his words? Why go to these lengths to tell us there is something fixed and rocklike about his agenda? Why? Because he knows – and he knows that we know – that the opposite is the case.

If this country were to make the tragic mistake of electing Ed Miliband and the Labour Party, we would usher in perhaps the most intrinsically weak government of modern times. Far from being graven in stone, his words would not be worth the paper they were written on. Miliband knows that his intentions would count for nothing – that he could not get a single bill through the Commons – without the approval of the Scottish Nationalists. He wouldn’t be Moses or Hammurabi; he would be rapidly transformed into the obsequious butler of Downing Street, constantly tending to the demands of fiery Aunt Nicola, always making sure that Alec Salmond was topped up with pink champagne – and at the expense of the English taxpayer.

Britain’s political stability would be seriously weakened. The two parties plainly despise each other, and already fight like ferrets in a sack. The economy would be weakened, as Labour and SNP competed to impose a series of smash-and-grab policies that would simply discourage enterprise and drive away investment. British public services would be weakened by the consequent fall in economic confidence and tax revenues. Britain’s defences would be weakened, as the Scots Nats campaigned for nuclear disarmament; and Britain’s standing abroad would be weakened by Miliband’s refusal to take on the British responsibility – to lead reform in Europe, and then put those reforms to the British people in a referendum.

With the eurozone still in turmoil, with a revanchist Putin, with the American economy wobbling again, there is only one way to give this country the strong leadership it needs – and that is to give David Cameron and the Conservatives five more years. We have come back from a terrible recession – exacerbated by Miliband and Ed Balls – to be one of the fastest-growing economies in the West, with dizzying growth in employment and new businesses. This country has amazing potential standing at the crossroads of the global economy: the commercial, cultural, creative, tech, medical and university capital of Europe if not the world – and still a huge manufacturing power.

Our mission now must be to ensure that more people share in that success across the country, to raise productivity, and to harness a more dynamic market economy to help pay for the poor, the needy, and better and better public services. I cannot believe that people will want to put that at risk, and to return to the Seventies nostrums of Labour. The Tories need another five years to embed and extend the considerable achievements of this coalition.

Let us therefore consign Milibandias and his tombstone to the bafflement of future archaeologists. Let it go down as the last act of a desperate candidate, and the heaviest suicide note in history."
 
The amount of MDs that have stood up in front of companies last week and the week before have just said literally that. A minority labour government is the worse situation for this country. This is what business is saying. Industry is going to decline. This is a big risk to jobs.

What industry?

Besides, the IMF said the recession will still be going on in 2020. The question is, how rapid will it deteriorate under Labour… The IMF also said the deficit wont be dealt with by 2018 like the parties have said, of course.

Government and unintended consequences.

 
I'll be glad when the election, and subsequent deal making, is done as this series of threads have shown a nastier side to these forums than I ever thought possible.
 
yup - in terms of overall support for the individual parties in that constituency Labour is slightly ahead, but on voting intentions Clegg gets more support thanks to Tory tactical voters - half of the Tory supporters in that constituency will vote for him instead of the Tory candidate.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics...tical-votes-to-save-nick-clegg-in-hallam-poll

Don't know why, his own party will eat him up within 12 months, he's talked up a deal with the tories, including a referendum on the EU to save his own skin but at the same time put several others on the block.
 
I'll be glad when the election, and subsequent deal making, is done as this series of threads have shown a nastier side to these forums than I ever thought possible.

It's like this every time, the 2005 and in particular the 2010 season was bad too. In fact i remember it being even worse in general last time

I'm more or less done too and will be scaling back the comments in the thread until Thursday night
 
Lol he'd only be jumping for joy at another prospect of independence in the nearish future.

After missing out on his sulking post last referendum Id hate to see his glee.
 
Boris Johnson

"It’s the smugness that gets me. It’s the brass-necked complacency. As a piece of premature chicken-counting combined with insolent disrespect to the will of the electorate, this Labour stunt is frankly unbeatable.

...

Shame that the whole electorate won't see this. The man is a legend.
 
I wish Biohazard was still here, his posts literally made up 90% of any politics related thread.

Was glorious :(

Me too :( another reason to hate Rupert Murdoch's SNP - if they'd actually have delivered independence for Scotland then we'd still have Biohazard here.
 
http://mainlymacro.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/uk-election-it-was-mediamacro-wot-won-it.html

Ignoring the normal academic caveats, the message is clear: the only topic on which the Conservatives are doing better today than shortly after they won the last election is their handling of the economy in general.

Yet when you look at any standard criteria of economic performance, the economy has done terribly during the coalition’s term of office. There is no doubt about this: numbers from GDP per head to real wages all tell a similar story. Average living standards have not increased, which means that they have fallen for many, a result which is almost unprecedented over a five year period. How much of this is the result of government policy is debatable, but that is not a debate that you see in the media. What you see in the media is an obsession with the government’s budget deficit, and on that criterion the coalition has left the economy in a better state than when it came in. So the only way to explain these poll results is that people have internalised the media’s obsession with the deficit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom