Caporegime
Gibbo's actually gave the R600 a 7 now. ![Smile :) :)](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/smile.gif)
![Smile :) :)](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/smile.gif)
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
WoZZeR said:Presumably the XT-X will be more power efficient too.
Cyber-Mav said:be very interesting to see what the price will be especially once the 8900 series is around.
there is a rumour also flying around that crysis will be the game bundled with the r600.
iv come across that on a couple of forums now so it could be true.![]()
I agree we need competition and I dont want to see either company get pushed out of the fight. However the r600 has 320 stream processors while currently the 8800 has less stream processors enabled than are already on the chip. The chip has 160 stream processors now but not all are enabled. The GTS has 96 and the GTX has 128 stream processors enabled.TREE said:Also on a side note i wonder what Nvidia will do about those extra stream processors on the 8800 GTX, and if they are brought foward will this make an R600 seem a little less impressive on launch?
How can Nvidia make the fact that they can enable up to 1/2 of the number of stream processors that ATI have enabled on R600, make R600 "less impressive".
fornowagain said:Ah, that was 320 stream processors??? vs unified shaders![]()
http://www.vr-zone.com/?i=4898
64x5=320vec5 or maybe scalar?