Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 33,188
We've got replacements (Pienaar, Rose) but 'Arry seems reluctant to play them. I don't want to see us play Modric on the left of midfield again. He's totally wasted there.
The problem for Spurs is:
Matches in which King has played at least 45 minutes: P9 W9 D0 L0
Matches in which King hasn't: P6 W2 D1 L3
This is going to be so problematic over the Christmas period.
That's so ridiculously oversimplified that its a joke.
of those 6 games, you played, City, Utd(both san's adebayor), Newcastle who at the time people thought was a fluke but were realising that they (without injuries) have a genuinely top 6 side. How good would Djourou's record appear, or really any Arsenal player appear if they just happened to not play City, Utd, Newcastle, Liverpool?
There is something fundamentally wrong with a player who can't be relied on, lets say he actually was the best CB the world ever knew, what does it do to the team when he misses almost every big game through injury. They come up to a big game thinking "we can win", then he gets injured, misses the game and the whole team is thinking "how can we win now
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/acff2/acff25e8e0f3553880111f7dfb81686cf78ab820" alt="Frown :( :("
That would be IF he was the best in the world, he isn't, he has plenty of bad games, not least the Arsenal game where RVP and Fabregas made him look foolish. He's had plenty of good games, at this stage, and frankly 4-5 years ago it was clear as day he'd never become a 35 league games a year player, not even close, and for a CB they should have been working on a replacement for a long time now.
Had he missed 4 games against bottom half opposition and played the 4 against top teams then his stats would likely paint the exact opposite picture to the way they do now. A true top 6 team, statistically only the games against the rest of the top 6 really say anything, the teams below that are so poor in comparison its not even worth comparing.