Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 33,188
It doesn't need to be a tackle for the ref to see it as a red, could have been sent off mainly for intent if that's the way the ref has seen it ie: reacting to the fact he was being held back. Like I said, you see it when a striker is trying to block a clearance and ends up catching the player in the follow through.
I'm not agreeing with it, in my eyes it was harsh.
I do agree about Le Tiss though, he's a shocking commentator and pundit. What's he talking about there saying Fletcher was lucky not to have a bad injury? Come on Matt.
The difference is, when a defender is trying to clear it, well as I said, there is follow through, when you expect someone to lump it 50 yards you should expect follow through and not put your foot right where the follow through will be. Here there wasn't any expectation for Fletcher to kick through the ball and he didn't.
Yet another pretty clear foul the ref is looking directly at and missed, doesn't appear to be making a lot of effort to even it up yet.
Last edited: