Greenlizard0 Weekend Football Thread ** spoilers ** [19 - 23rd April 2013]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Purdy said:
I could settle for this.



He isn't going to call him out directly after the game and thankfully didn't attempt to defend him so stop talking trash.



Yeah pity he is a bit of a tit.
Click to expand...

I know he isn't and it isn't talking trash, I know he wouldn't it's a rant didn't know they were forbid, also I do somtimes think its what certain players need at times yes we do need him as he scored loads for us and works extremely hard for the team but this isn't his first incident
 
Mark1989 said:
I know he isn't and it isn't talking trash, I know he wouldn't it's a rant didn't know they were forbid, also I do somtimes think its what certain players need at times yes we do need him as he scored loads for us and works extremely hard for the team but this isn't his first incident
Click to expand...

My bad, thought it was a dig at Rodgers, I'm glad he didn't he would only have opened himself up to questions he is unprepared for.
 
Tom84 said:
No

Just no, the ref did not see it
Click to expand...

Well, there is more proof that he did than didn't at the moment. You know, considering he spoke to him directly after.

I'm not defending him, but if Defoe 'got away with it', then surely so should Suarez? The precedence has been set.
 
Last edited:
MrJohnSherry said:
Well, there is more proof that he did than didn't at the moment. You know, considering he spoke to him directly after.
Click to expand...

No there's absolutely no proof whatsoever, he could have been talking to Suarez about any number of things. Do you really think if he saw Suarez biting Ivanovic he wouldn't of sent him off or at the very least booked him? Dont be stupid.
 
Last edited:
MrJohnSherry said:
Well, there is more proof that he did than didn't at the moment. You know, considering he spoke to him directly after.
Click to expand...

you seriously think that the referee witnessed suarez literally bite ivanovic and decided to just let it slide? he very, very obviously did not see the incident

I'm not defending him, but if Defoe 'got away with it', then surely so should Suarez? The precedence has been set.
Click to expand...

yeah if one person gets away with a horrendous foul then everyone else should be allowed to do it freely for the rest of time. that sounds totally reasonable
 
"PFA player of the year needs 8 game ban" Daily Mail

This may go away like a lot of the elbows Percy throws, but then again...
 
Tom84 said:
No there's absolutely no proof whatsoever, he could have be talking to Suarez about any number of things. Do you really think if he saw Suarez biting Ivanovic he wouldn't of sent him off or at the very least booked him? Dont be stupid.
Click to expand...

As with McManaman and Agueros challenges, the ref only needs to have seen the players coming together, not necessarily the details of the challenge.

Edit: The Rooney elbow vs Wigan is actually a better example. The ref saw them come together but not the actual elbow and that saved Rooney from a retrospective ban.
 
Tom84 said:
No there's absolutely no proof whatsoever, he could have been talking to Suarez about any number of things. Do you really think if he saw Suarez biting Ivanovic he wouldn't of sent him off or at the very least booked him? Dont be stupid.
Click to expand...

I am not being stupid. But ok, we will agree to disagree.
 
Not really one for mentioning other forums but the reaction on RWAK is jaw dropping to say the least. 'Get in there Luis Lad' 'Complete Media Over reaction'

FML :rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom