Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 33,188
As with McManaman and Agueros challenges, the ref only needs to have seen the players coming together, not necessarily the details of the challenge.
Edit: The Rooney elbow vs Wigan is actually a better example. The ref saw them come together but not the actual elbow and that saved Rooney from a retrospective ban.
With the first two tackles, fouls were given even though the severity of the nature of the foul was missed, but essentially the "tackle" was punished according to the ref/FA. Rooney playing for England/Utd is what saved Rooney from punishment.
In either case the fa can punish anything they want, they just have to deem it extraordinary.... in other words, they can pick and choose who to punish, Englands top striker.... will get a lot of leniency, so will others.
The simple situation of the backlash over two horrendous on field situations being let off recently may well be a deciding factor. FA think they look bad, managers are talking about the rules needing to change, FA throws them a bone with a deserved ban then can bang on about how the existing rules work fine.
ALmost everything like this is more political than it is down to the rules, they've got the room to interpret most of it however the hell they want on a given day.
Thing is some bans get carried over into other leagues, some don't, I can't remember if Barton was banned for a bunch of games in France or not in the end, the FA wanted the French FA to hold up the ban IIRC. Will the FA take into account his previous bite to increase the punishment is what i'm getting at?