Man of Honour
- Joined
- 29 Nov 2008
- Posts
- 13,320
- Location
- London
Hah, both players encroaching and City get another chance to go ahead.
Harsh on Patricio
Harsh on Patricio
Encroachment is only penalised if the offending player either clears or scores the rebound. It kind of makes sense or else you'll be retaking pretty much every pen.It is farcical. Attacking team ultimately rewarded for what was a penalisable offence on both teams.
Football now just feels like playing FIFA! it feels automated and robotic
Officiating seems to be worse now, officials mustn’t bother paying as much attention as VAR will sort it
I'm interested to see the penalty incident again, I'm sure he stood on his trailing foot and personally I'd feel annoyed if that was my team and it didn't get given.
Indeed, he's definitely made an absolute meal of it but as I saw it, standing on his foot is standing on his foot, it ought to be penalised.Yep clearly stood on his foot, I think it's the delayed reactions and theatrics that make it look like a dive.
I think he had already over hit the ball though and was only going to be right on the line. he wasn't going anywhere so went down when his foot got stood on. VAR bought it. He could have stayed up if he wanted to keep the ball in.I'm interested to see the penalty incident again, I'm sure he stood on his trailing foot and personally I'd feel annoyed if that was my team and it didn't get given.
Coulda, woulda, shoulda. A foul is a foul imo and standing on someone's foot is well within that boundary as I see it.I think he had already over hit the ball though and was only going to be right on the line. he wasn't going anywhere so went down when his foot got stood on. VAR bought it. He could have stayed up if he wanted to keep the ball in.