Rooney actually doesn't hold the ball up that well because he doesn't have a great first touch (very often rolls it up to himself at chest height) and isn't that quick over 2 yards (why he seldom dribbles past players anymore), he's better when he has players around him in a flowing counter attack.
The only player we have that can hold it is Berbatov who is ridiculously strong and has an insane first touch when he can be bothered to play. But Man Utd haven't really relied on a holding man since the days of Mark Hughes. Even with Van Nistelrooy we played it quick to the wings.
I agree, it was pumped up to our smallest player between their CB and LB, it was purely fortunate Hernandez managed to get anything on that. That said, Rooney's long passing game is actually a lot stronger than his 5-yard passing game.
What i mean is that rooney up front would have given us more width with Young or Giggs on earlier (or from the start) and at least rooney has a chance to take the ball down and turn. hernandez does not have the strength or ability to do this. He isnt going to win any flick ons so that makes it arkward if he is playing up front on his own.
Tom84, your argument is, frankly, poor.
if someone makes an observation about team A, you dont counter that by saying that team B has strength/weakness XYZ.
that is a 'my father would do this,', 'no my father would do THIS' type of situation.
you arent addressing the point, merely deflecting attention away from said point in a futile attempt to turn defence into attack.
You do realsie that cm1179 didnt compare UTD to tottenham, he just spoke about UTD. So trying to compare that against something else is a bit pojntless really, because it was a comparative with UTD of old, not with tottenham...
Fact is we can play some great football. But its like we have become so complacent that we do not. We have to go a goal or two behind beforeour players actually wake up and realise they cant win most EPL games at 80%, the 'just show up' method, where UTD of old would rock up and the opposition woujld capitulate before we even took to the pitch. The average lower teams now have more quality. and the top teams now have less talent than previously.
its a narrowing of the gap between the best and the worst.
You might say, what evidence have you of this? You just have to look around at the stars of old, its not surprising that the best players for the late 90#s and early 00's are still performing well.
Del Piero is still makign the rest of Juve's strikers look paper mache', Scholes still cant be replaced, Giggs is still hugely influential. these players are 35. Hwoever, in their heyday they werent even the best players around! they were top players and are still great, but as time progresses, as athletes get better surely you should have more, fitter, less injury prone giggys swimming around out there. or beckhams. its like the average of everyone has increased, but beyond Messi and Ronaldo, the top players are not as good, or standoutish as they were 10 years ago.