Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 58,009
- Location
- Surrey
Hmm maybe he was onside by that replay.
Lol what?Body was level so no that shouldn't be CONSIDERED offside
That was so so so so so close, to the point i'd probably plump for onside if I was calling it from those video views. Harsh to judge it offside and rule out a goal really.Benefit someone when they're offside? Wut
Hmm maybe he was onside by that replay.
any part of the head, body or feet is nearer to the opponents’ goal line than both the ball and the second-last opponent
Barclay takes too long to make a decision.
Edit: Another shocking decision, this time from Lukaku. Do they even teammate?
They put the line at the lean of his head.He isn't very close to being onside, they put the line at his foot, the rule isn't about his foot, he was leaning significantly forward. His feet might have been onside but his head and upper body were not onside.