• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

***Haswell -E Owners Thread***

This F11B Bios for my UD4 seems a little buggy, keep getting failed to boot messages and it now seems that since flashing to it, windows thinks I've changed my hardware and i need to activate it again.
 
uksoldierboy said:
Restoring to defaults settings seems to cure it, this 4.6 overclock is solid in games and benchmarks though, not had one crash :( what can be done to help in pass POST guys?
Click to expand...

You may find that the new bios more than likely needs slightly modifying your voltages for the same previous stable overclock - try raising v core a notch etc and see if you can get it stable. Re check your other bios settings etc, and put them back to where they should be. Have you checked memory timings since the bios flash or use xmp. Are you getting any boot codes on failure to boot with your settings?


Mark
 
Last edited:
tipes said:
You may find that the new bios more than likely needs slightly modifying your voltages for the same previous stable overclock - try raising v core a notch etc and see if you can get it stable. Re check your other bios settings etc, and put them back to where they should be. Have you checked memory timings since the bios flash or use xmp. Are you getting any boot codes on failure to boot with your settings?


Mark
Click to expand...

Cheers Mark,

Previously my overclock was solid at 1.32, i've tried up to 1.35 but i still get this "boot failure detected" message, it's strange, have no problems in windows, games or benchmarks, just seems to be on boot.

My memory doesn't have an XMP profile so it's just running at it's default speeds of 2400.
 
uksoldierboy said:
Cheers Mark,

Previously my overclock was solid at 1.32, i've tried up to 1.35 but i still get this "boot failure detected" message, it's strange, have no problems in windows, games or benchmarks, just seems to be on boot.

My memory doesn't have an XMP profile so it's just running at it's default speeds of 2400.
Click to expand...


I have been having a boot & shutdown failure with the same Teamgroup Elite ram & mine do not have XMP either, The only way I get stable is to reduce the ram speed to 2133Mhz.

Which is why I arranged an RMA for mine & the fact that the ram is supposed to have an XMP profile.
 
Lack of XMP programming is definitely a reason to RMA the RAM. All TeamGroup memory should have it. If you weren't too bothered by it though you could always find out the timings from someone with the RAM
 
Mogwilson said:
I have been having a boot & shutdown failure with the same Teamgroup Elite ram & mine do not have XMP either, The only way I get stable is to reduce the ram speed to 2133Mhz.

Which is why I arranged an RMA for mine & the fact that the ram is supposed to have an XMP profile.
Click to expand...

Cheers Wilson,

Does your new ram have an XMP Profile?

Silent_Scone said:
Lack of XMP programming is definitely a reason to RMA the RAM. All TeamGroup memory should have it. If you weren't too bothered by it though you could always find out the timings from someone with the RAM
Click to expand...


This i didn't know, I thought because it was "cheaper" DDR4 ram, it did without XMP Profiles:eek:

Only issue is the packaging that the ram came in was extremely difficult to open and keep intact, i failed in doing this, does this affect anything?
 
At CL14 now, Not giving up on CL13 yet though.

What i will say is CL14 is rock solid stable, not one issue since i moved there.
 
tipes said:
What is considered a safe level for 24x7, and then maybe something more for bench run with tighter timings? Hope this makes sense.

Mark
Click to expand...

There hasn't been enough growth for anyone to safely say but I would keep it under 1.4v for long term. Try not to go too mad on timings, most end user timings are wrong. Let the board do most of the work and try for T1 first
 
Another X99 build, this one will be purely for just putting through it's paces. Not done much benching for a few months.

I'll hope for more good silicon, but I always get a goodn' :D

EYSUcIL.jpg.png
 
Silent_Scone said:
There hasn't been enough growth for anyone to safely say but I would keep it under 1.4v for long term. Try not to go too mad on timings, most end user timings are wrong. Let the board do most of the work and try for T1 first
Click to expand...

Thanks for that - I am currently running T1 at stock ram speeds though as far as timings go on 1.35v. just not sure how to go on tuning the 4 main timings let alone 2nds and thirds. Any advice would be useful. I have to admit I have never before bothered with ram tuning only cpu.

Mark
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom