That's cool. Back to the blacklist for you kiddo. Note, most people thing you're a **** due to your obnoxious posts. Maybe you should read your own **** before commenting on others lol. Pathetic.
HDD or SSD for games
- Thread starter agnes
- Start date
That's cool. Back to the blacklist for you kiddo. Note, most people thing you're a **** due to your obnoxious posts. Maybe you should read your own **** before commenting on others lol. Pathetic.
Soldato
Having seen just one of his posts, I'm inclined to agree...
Soldato
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2010
- Posts
- 3,034
This video is interesting as it has NVMe vs SATA SSD vs HDD load times.
1:30min onwards for game loads.
1:30min onwards for game loads.
That's pretty cool, filled me with confidence a bit. I'm dreading the extra load times a little from the new drive. But realistically, I doubt I'll care about a few seconds here and there.
Associate
SSD is pretty much a must for online gaming now I think, well for some games anyway. I have a few on my SSD but H1Z1 King of the Hill for example is on my mech drive, when I finally load into the game in my parachute people are already on the ground killing people. I should test this really and put H1Z1 on my SSD.
Soldato
Very interesting video.
I am a data hoarder, and it troubles me to delete anything.
In respect of my system I have the following.
OS = 128GB SSD
STEAM = 6tb HDD
ORIGIN/UPLAY = 3tb HDD
+ multiple external drives I use for media
I have another SSD (128GB) that is just used as a drive to put one or two games.
100% there is a difference with my OS load times, but I havent got enough space on my SSDS to really install games to see if there is much of a difference.
I am a data hoarder, and it troubles me to delete anything.
In respect of my system I have the following.
OS = 128GB SSD
STEAM = 6tb HDD
ORIGIN/UPLAY = 3tb HDD
+ multiple external drives I use for media
I have another SSD (128GB) that is just used as a drive to put one or two games.
100% there is a difference with my OS load times, but I havent got enough space on my SSDS to really install games to see if there is much of a difference.
I'm sorry but surely that video completely settles any arguments.
I had the notion that for gaming the difference between an SSD vs HDD was so minimal that it's not worth spending mega bucks on a TB+ SSD and that video literally proves it down to the 't'.
Made some people shrink right back into their dark corners. Haha. Nice post mate!
I had the notion that for gaming the difference between an SSD vs HDD was so minimal that it's not worth spending mega bucks on a TB+ SSD and that video literally proves it down to the 't'.
Made some people shrink right back into their dark corners. Haha. Nice post mate!
Last edited:
Yeah but that's still to the extent of being so niche is it worth sacrificing the money and not having your entire library accessible immediately. Personally I think it contributes to people having a massive backlog, they might pose it as "simple" but my time is at an absolute premium and I certainly would rather play a game than wait for a 50 GB transfer and pseudo install.
Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Sep 2016
- Posts
- 9,521
yup apart from gaming loading, level loading within 1-2 seconds of each other. Not worth it.
Associate
This thread turned into an IGN comments section, easy guys!
SSD for games definitely. I got one of the M2 drives (960 EVO) for OS and it really is fast but I don’t notice much difference between loading games on it and my normal Samsung SSD (850 EVO). I think the 850 EVO just loads games so quickly you don’t need much more than that.
Then I have a 6TB WD HDD for everything else – I have a few old games on it and it’s actually fine.
Then I have a 6TB WD HDD for everything else – I have a few old games on it and it’s actually fine.
Soldato
Another video comparing times, for balance:
Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Sep 2016
- Posts
- 9,521
BF 1 is bad on HD.
Soldato
The big thing is if its repeatedly loaded, you want the SSD. Some games are using the HD for large textures actively loading during gameplay in the background. If the game loads just once then HD is often fine, the H1z1 example mentioned however rings true that some games give advantage to loading speed.
1 point on Vega I noticed recently seemed to favour having a very fit and able loading system, maybe we'll get details later today to back me up on that. At least have the option of a compact but very fast load time imo, a lot of games it wont ever really matter though
1 point on Vega I noticed recently seemed to favour having a very fit and able loading system, maybe we'll get details later today to back me up on that. At least have the option of a compact but very fast load time imo, a lot of games it wont ever really matter though
Man of Honour
Said a million times above but yes, another vote for SSD here. Some games save you seconds, but some save you minutes. Why wait?
Associate
I can tell you now my HD with rainbow six online would load on every match ! As soon as I switched to SSD 250 its INSTANT ! says it all.