Help after being on remand and being found not guilty.

You didn't want to bring up your case but within 10 posts on a niche computing forum you seem to have done so ...

1) Do you have gloves?
2) And did they have a complete video record of your travelling without gaps?
3) The CPS has specific guidance that such things are irrelevant. Also I could quite easily hurt someone very badly without leaving any marks whatsoever - I suspect most people on here could.

So did you do it being as you yet again didn't actually state you didn't. From the sounds of it you did do it, but still got found not guilty and are now doing the same woe is me routine that you accuse this woman of. Sounds like you actually deserve each other.

Wow! Just wow!
 
Just go for a forum break the internet and people combined tends to be very bad in times of stress it is by far the worst thing to do. Maybe digitalspy is different but here no no. Christ the man could be near reaching for a rope.

I can picture a horror story if you managed to be single with dead parents aged around 30-40 and put on remand and released. Your stuff is probably in some storage container bashed up by a landlord. Your previous address is gone and now occupied and all your bills are unpaid. You could risk being blacklisted by BT and your credit card company/bank and have to fight overdraft charges?

You know if this is true you need to get serious life changing compensation right? Because it would be a life changing event able to scar even the best citizen. I have literally a 100% clean record with courts and police never been in trouble once but if this happened to me and they handed me something like 20k and said on your way. I would be buying 20k worth of shotgun ammo...
 
I can picture a horror story if you managed to be single with dead parents aged around 30-40 and put on remand and released. Your stuff is probably in some storage container bashed up by a landlord. Your previous address is gone and now occupied and all your bills are unpaid. You could risk being blacklisted by BT and your credit card company/bank and have to fight overdraft charges?

This is the point. What if someone doesn't have anyone to help them once they are released. This is more common then some people think. Not everyone has a good support system. What do they do? The reality is they would have sleep rough and either beg for food or commit crimes to get money.

It is unacceptable to just throw people out on the street after it was them (police, courts, the system) that put that person in that situation in the first place.
 
Agreed sue them with a HR lawyer. Citizens advice, Doctors you name it you can play dirty just like they do. There are a few ways to skin a cat here and i have heard people sue for a lot of money for a lot less.


Just let on your a mumbling wreck if needed.
 
Given the complainant's history of making false accusations TPTB screwed up by deciding to proceed with a prosecution against the OP. She was obviously a serial grifter looking to get some victims-of-crime compo and they should have seen through her. Clearly, the OP deserves financial compensation for having his life wrecked.

Unfortunately, the OP's case is not unique at all. Mick Shepherd, (a registered antique firearms dealer) with a spotless record did 10 months on remand in Belmarsh Prison before being found not guilty and released. He was obviously innocent because it was proved in Court that the Metropolitan Police did not even understand the legal definition of an antique-obsolete-calibre-firearm and they made numerous other false allegations against him to the media when he was arrested, which were reported on the national TV news and in sensationalist detail by the tabloid press:

'...After 10 months of being held in custody for crimes he did not commit, Mick Shepherd was released without charge. The members of the Jury at The Old Bailey found him not guilty on every single charge and accusation thrown at him.

The eminent Judge Rennie released him from court back to his family and friends in the same standing that he was in before being falsely arrested and imprisoned. Judge Rennie said Mick Shepherd shall return to society without a blemish to his name and with no criminal record, he has done nothing wrong and so released a free and innocent man.

Judge Rennie also said that all of Mick Shepherd's personal belongings [antique firearms] shall be returned to him immediately, this is something that Operation Trident still have not complied with...'

'...Where was Operation Trident's evidence? they made some very serious allegations to the media at the time of the false arrest, but when we got to The Old Bailey, there was no evidence, they had nothing to back up these allegations... it was all just lies and manufactured false evidence blown completely apart by Lord Ian Glen Q.C....'

Quotes source: http://www.micksguns.com/mick's story - the facts.htm

Don't ever trust the Police or CPS.
 
And it is a last resort if bail isn't appropriate, which it usually is in less serious cases.

I haven't done a huge amount of remand files in 15 years and the last one was January 2014.
 
You don't have to, the prosecution have to prove your guilt.
However if you are proven innocent (by the ways I mentioned or others), then you are eligible for compensation, which is likely to be significantly more than the amount you've stated for those released after serving a sentence.

I heard that you can't claim compensation if you have previous convictions - I guess thats fair to a point - if you were found not guilty I would think some provision might be in place - like sheltered accommodation and then a loan from the social benefits place.
 
Xordium has become extremely aggressive and hateful ,(ban for aggressive hateful behaviour mods?) (even for GD standards), so ignore him..
I'm sorry your post has turned into this Jones. As you say, it's not about your trial, but about the treatment for those found not guilty.
I think this answers one of the first questions on why he came here- First forum, full of dicks, second forum, full of dicks and now here unfortunately where he thought he could find unbiased helpful comments, he has found dicks
 
Last edited:
I think Xordium was getting nasty because the OP would not answer the question 'Did you do it?' but kept side stepping which I also found strange.
 
I think Xordium was getting nasty because the OP would not answer the question 'Did you do it?' but kept side stepping which I also found strange.

Aybe he was standing his ground that he is not on trial here and that in opinion the proof is obvious and doesn't require a plea. I think it's fair that he didn't need to answer such a question personally.
 
I heard that you can't claim compensation if you have previous convictions - I guess thats fair to a point - if you were found not guilty I would think some provision might be in place - like sheltered accommodation and then a loan from the social benefits place.

You can't claim compensation for time on remand unless the police have acted improperly. Doesn't matter if you have previous convictions or not. What police have acted improperly. What Abraham was saying is wrong.
 
I think Xordium was getting nasty because the OP would not answer the question 'Did you do it?' but kept side stepping which I also found strange.

I thought "Like I said the evidence was clear I didn't do it. Everyone in the courtroom knew I didn't do it. There wasn't any doubt." was enough. Anyone with common sense will realise this this means I didn't do it.

I also knew Xordium was trolling and I don't need to convince him. He kept coming up with stupid posts and clearly had no idea what he was talking about.
 
Back
Top Bottom