@Spacedeck looks like adequate contact. you need to apply a bit more thermal compound.
there but not quite
there but not quite

i normally just use tissue paper lolis it safe to clean the CPU heater with the same thing I clean the CPU with? Currently got ArtiClean (from OcUK).
i highly doubt it, but post a pic of the interior of the case with everything mounted as is please?Could it be the air being fed through the system? As in the amount of air getting in to cool it down?
i highly doubt it, but post a pic of the interior of the case with everything mounted as is please?
at least we can have a look to exclude it
that looks absolutely fine to me. you can try increasing the rpm of the front fans to see if it'll help with better airflow?collection of photos due to location but you should get the general idea
that looks absolutely fine to me. you can try increasing the rpm of the front fans to see if it'll help with better airflow?
i highly doubt that spending more on extra case fans would help with the temps.
if it makes no difference, then definitely the above advise stands. don't bother with new/extra fansSet them to run at full speed and pretty much zero difference. Both spinning at 1150 RPM
it leaves the cpu requiring a delid lol. (either a hot chip by default, or the internal thermal paste has dried up)If the CPU cooler IS making contact with the CPU as shown previously, what does that leave?
TBF the top of your IHS looks quite scratched and I'm not sure the chip or the heatsink were particularly clean from those photos. You're aiming for spotless, no previous paste, no finger grease, nothing at all on there.
But I doubt it would make more than a few degrees' difference really![]()
Well you want a smooth flat surface on both for good thermal transfer. In an ideal world the IHS and heatsink are perfectly mated and there's lots of direct contact, metal to metal. The thermal paste is only there to fill small gaps. It's why some high end coolers have a polished bottom.Is this bad?
Yeah, if 80c is the best you can get, then leave it. It's nowhere near the thermal limit.I really don't think I'll try to delid just yet as I just couldn't afford to replace if anything went wrong. Will keep an eye on temps though and hope they don't shoot up to 90/100c anymore.
Unless doing it seriously wrong differences made by paste applications should be couple to max handfull of degrees.I give upI made sure to be more generous with the paste this time but temps haven't really budged. Some cores reporting a few degrees lower but I suppose it'll have to do for now until I can think of other solutions. Atleast it isn't hitting 100c anymore.
Curious, most reviews don't mention anything on it being especially hard to apply.Kryonaut is known for being quite thick and viscous.
BTW, what's the particular CPU?
Apparently Intel put some chewed up bubblegums of Krzanich at least under heatspreader of 4790K:
https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/posts/31964604
Guess we now know why it's named that way: Runs hot as hell.So this is the CPU I received. https://www.overclockers.co.uk/inte...ocket-lga1150-processor-retail-cp-539-in.html.
So I woke up today and ran another test, PRIME generally stuck around 73-75c, however one core did peak at 78c at one point. This was ran for about 1 hour 15 mins. I'm also seeing what results it gives when using Intel Extreme Tuning Utility, after a quick 5 minutes it averaged around 65c and peaked at 69c. Going to do a final test of an hour and see if it reaches PRIME level.
It is much cooler today than it was yesterday in the room.
What is the different between the two programs to cause different results?
What is the different between the two programs to cause different results?