Soldato
So you think that it is common that a retailer needs to pay more than the RRP to buy in stock?
Because that is what is happening now if you take the original RRP. I'm sure it does happen, but when it does, most manufacturers are open to the public to say that they've been forced to increase prices for some certain reason. Here, it appears to have been a plan from the outset, not some unforeseen circumstance or world event that just happened to increase prices 30 minutes after launch.
Not at all. I think you are reading what I wrote wrong, or maybe I just worded it badly? I am saying the retailer pays LESS than RRP. The manufacturer is not going to suggest a price to sell at and have the retailer pay more than the price they suggest.
With what I originally said, I was trying to clear up the part where people seemed to be getting confused with RRP. A retailer pays less, and sells for profit. Dependent on the type of product they make a good profit based just on the RRP itself, so when it gets more than that, they are really making some good money. no one should be thinking that the retailer is 'having' to sell at more than rrp.