Caporegime
- Joined
- 21 Jun 2006
- Posts
- 38,367
So the actual sold prices were about 15% over the guide price? Almost exactly what I said.
So what are you telling me £73k is unattainable for someone earning minimum wage?
So the actual sold prices were about 15% over the guide price? Almost exactly what I said.
So what are you telling me £73k is unattainable for someone earning minimum wage?
So what are you telling me £73k is unattainable for someone earning minimum wage?
Surely that will get hoovered up by a btl landlord, someone on min wage would have very little chance of getting a foot in...So what are you telling me £73k is unattainable for someone earning minimum wage?
Looks like you're about to get dragged into the sky by Joseph!
Surely that will get hoovered up by a btl landlord, someone on min wage would have very little chance of getting a foot in...
''Investment Analysis - This apartment has the potential to generate a monthly rental income of £1,000 - £1,150.''
The max mortgage a single person on minimum wage could get is £68,700 if they have zero out goings. If the person is living at home with parents they should be able to save a 10% deposit in around 12 months. If they are already renting probably more like 24 - 36 months. However in that 24 - 36 months the house has probably increased 7-10% in value so it is now out of their reach.
So Psycho Sonnys solution is for everyone to move to Glasgow, sounds like he really has it all figured out, what a well thought out idea.
This is in the realm of Stockhausen levels of stupidity.
£9 an hour here ,people just need to pull their fingers out and go out of area ,do a little upgrading ,done it in Yorkshire and here it's not rocket science
Is it really that simple?No I'm just proving there are affordable houses available. Even within a major city centre.
I'm sure I could find them in Newcastle, Liverpool, etc too.
Just not London.
If you cannot afford to buy a place in London then yeah you might want to move elsewhere and yeah get a job elsewhere too if the one you have in London means you cannot live there.
What is stupid is people expecting houses to pop up in front of them for £50k or someone to magically deposit £200k into their bank account.
If you cannot buy a house in the area you are looking then look elsewhere. Simple as that.
That was 2018, probably increased yet again in the last two years.some website via google said:In terms of who the market now serves, the biggest change was seen in the proportion of those aged 35 to 44 living in privately rented homes. While in 1996/1997, just 16% of this age group were private tenants, the latest results show this has risen to almost a quarter (24%).
As a 32-year-old single guy,I can never see owning my own home at this rate with house prices continuing to rise, Wages becoming stagnant and now this whole covid will put the economy in a mess for years & years to come and taxes & bills forever going up.
I really think there should be a legal limitation on how many properties landlords & property developers can buy purely for the rental market and never sell them..as its just pure greed and does not give people the option to buy.
They have as much a chance as anyone else.
To say a landlord has a better chance of buying a specific property over a resident is quite frankly hilarious.
It just feeds the hate towards landlords. I can't buy because nasty landlords get first dibs. I wish. I've never heard such nonsense.