Caporegime
@NVP you on my side yet?
Out of interest was there a big increase from the SVR to the Ferrari?I use comparison sites, call the top three, ask for better, speak to specialist brokers.
Then whoever gives me best quote or best price and best service combination, I then pay for in full.
The SVR cost me £780 this year, M3 is circa £450 with a declared value much higher than book and the Clio was about £200.
Out of interest was there a big increase from the SVR to the Ferrari?
Cashback sites usually come out more expensive than comparison sites for the same quote.But online you can usually get near £50 cash back, sometimes a lot more.
@NVP you on my side yet?
You're lucky, I was paying 3.3k at 25Meanwhile I have to pay £700+ for a 2001 Volvo with 5 years NCD.
Joys of being in your early 20's.
Seems expensive, I ran a quote through for a lambo and it was cheaper than my m3 (although so was my 911). It's a bit of a lottery I find. Was about 400 I think, maybe ferrari parts cost more?Ferrari is £1100.
Let me think about itnoI'm under 30 but my insurance allows me to drive your car fully comp. Wanna swap for an Ovlov for a week?
Let me think about it
If it makes it any easier, performance cars can often be cheaper to insure than regular cars. It's due to statistics. If the percentage of people crashing (or having stolen) average cars in your area is higher than people crashing their performance cars, then the M3 will be cheaper. I can't remember the exact figures but at one point I considered buying my brothers Vantage and it was ridiculously cheap to insure; hardly any more than the Peugeot 206 Diesel I recently acquired. I can understand why that is; I'd treat a Vantage/M3/Whatever like it's wrapped in cotton wool. But a cheap diesel hatchback not so much.This year with 5 years NCD at 23 is the first time quotes for most moderately high performance cars are three figures not four.
It makes me weep when people talk about their £150 policies on M3's and stuff