Those are custom bios that you can install if you want to do extreme overclocking.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
And I think it's brilliant that they did that. I said it ages ago. If AMD wanted to compete they would have to push things. If they had used normal clocks and power AMD would have been way behind.
And if Nvidia had stuck to their usual power budget of 250w where would they have been?
And if Nvidia had stuck to their usual power budget of 250w where would they have been?
You didn't follow the conversation. I was replying to Greebo who made the same comment.
Both companies have had to push the power use up to get any sort of gains at the high end.
Fair enough. I think Nvidia have definitely pushed Ampere as far as it will go tbh. The miniscule gains their AIBs have made shows that.
Will be interesting to see if there is still any headroom in RDNA2 for AMDs partners to make any compelling alternatives to the reference cards.
I actually think that this time they are playing it very fair and reasonable...You also have to factor in how much AMD exaggerated their numbers. It's always never a good as the numbers shown and those that we see given are always manipulated or reached in very specific circumstances in some way regardless if it is Nvidia or AMD
I actually think that this time they are playing it very fair and reasonable...
they gave all the details about test hardware etc...
obviously they chosen most favourable games.. but also games like Farcry (that are now to be very cpu dependant) are there on the charts...
idk .. but I think its real that its actually that good..
great, then forget about the numbers. wait 3 weeks for the actual reviews. who cares.AMD and Nvidia have never been straight down with the line with their numbers, people tend to look through rose tinted glasses at AMD because we notice how Intel and Nvidia have behaved because they have had by far the largest market share and tend to give AMD the benefit of the doubt even though they do similar misleading things.
I actually think that this time they are playing it very fair and reasonable...
they gave all the details about test hardware etc...
obviously they chosen most favourable games.. but also games like Farcry (that are now to be very cpu dependant) are there on the charts...
idk .. but I think its real that its actually that good..
You didn't follow the conversation. I was replying to Greebo who made the same comment.
Both companies have had to push the power use up to get any sort of gains at the high end.
but .. they are telling you that all of these are on.. they are not claiming its stock perfformance..Got to be joking, they need to show stock for stock, no RAGE mode, no SAM boost from the Zen 3 CPUs.
Got to be joking, they need to show stock for stock, no RAGE mode, no SAM boost from the Zen 3 CPUs.
Fair enough, they said they were using the RAGE and SAM on the slides, but if Nvidia did something like that, there would be hell on on here.
Fair enough. I think Nvidia have definitely pushed Ampere as far as it will go tbh. The miniscule gains their AIBs have made shows that.
Will be interesting to see if there is still any headroom in RDNA2 for AMDs partners to make any compelling alternatives to the reference cards.
but .. they are telling you that all of these are on.. they are not claiming its stock perfformance..
btw .. there were some numbers without any boosters
3090 is also not much faster than 3080
interestingly if I look at forza horizon 4 the 6900xt has 152fps with RAGE and SAM on compared to 138 on the 6800xt with everything off. The 6900xt's pricing doesn't really make sense - you're looking at single digit performance advantage over the 6800xt with no other redeeming features like extra vram or prosumer drivers
So, the same as the 3090 compared to the 3080 is what you're saying?
Just not over double the price