**HP OMEN 32 WQHD Gaming Monitor With AMD FreeSync Technology** A light in the quality control dark

i have the freesync hp envy 32 qhd, this looks the same spec minus the speakers.

cant fault mine to be honest.


EDIT.

the omen is 75hz mine is 60.
 
Last edited:
Reliability has been an issue for some units however I'd say for any of the top-end stuff, you're likely to be OK.

If I recall correctly WVA is essentially another name for IPS. 32" at that resolution would be pretty horrible IMO.
 
my haribo came yesterday with a free RX480, i will try the freesync but it only works
on displyport and i dont have a long enough cable, so i am stuck with hdmi for a while.
 
Reliability has been an issue for some units however I'd say for any of the top-end stuff, you're likely to be OK.

If I recall correctly WVA is essentially another name for IPS. 32" at that resolution would be pretty horrible IMO.

Depends what you mean by top end stuff. The monitors branded as gaming monitors are terrible.

I'm not sure the resolution would be any worse than a 24" 1920x1200 screen and those are sharp enough.
 
Damn - I would have snapped this up a little while back if it was available. 32" 1440p freesync is pretty much my ideal spec for a monitor.
 
Yeah this sounds promising, but I'm not getting my hopes up just yet.

First need to see how the retail version stacks up against the "review spec samples" then find a solid retailer for it, so not to get brunt again.
 
Last edited:
Don't count on this being any kind of "special" in terms of QA (though I understand hope never dies ;) )

Quote from hardforum:
TimSlin said:
I got mine yesterday. I really like it. I got it for 344 on sale.
There is a little bit of light leak maybe on the bottom left. looks slightly blueish.
The main problem I have with mine is that when i tilt it forward i get tiny red vertical bars across the entire monitor. Anyone seen this before?
If i tilt it back it goes away.
I tried multiple inputs, all same problem.

TimSlin said:
Yeah I really hate returns. Sadly it does appear to be the monitor, same thing is visible with nothing plug in.
 
I'm more concerned with how it handles motion. If that's decent it might be worth going through a few to get a good one.
 
If I recall correctly WVA is essentially another name for IPS. 32" at that resolution would be pretty horrible IMO.
It's the same DPI as a 24" 1080p, so most people should be OK with it. The panel is dead cert to be real VA as the only known 32" 1440p panels are VA, and no IPS type tech can do anything like 3000:1 contrast.
 
It's not IPS or VA. The tech is closer to IPS than VA.

You're thinking of AHVA (Advanced Hyper Viewing Angle) which is an IPS-type technology. That is not what is used here. This model in fact uses an AMVA+ panel, which HP simply refer to as WVA (Wide Viewing Angle) in some of their literature.
 
It's the same DPI as a 24" 1080p, so most people should be OK with it. The panel is dead cert to be real VA as the only known 32" 1440p panels are VA, and no IPS type tech can do anything like 3000:1 contrast.

same dpi as a 16" 1080p screen surely? And some people will find that too small.
 
You're thinking of AHVA (Advanced Hyper Viewing Angle) which is an IPS-type technology. That is not what is used here. This model in fact uses an AMVA+ panel, which HP simply refer to as WVA (Wide Viewing Angle) in some of their literature.

Possibly. But 5ms seems really quick 3000:1 contrast a little low.

First thing though is can HP deliver on quality.
 
Possibly. But 5ms seems really quick 3000:1 contrast a little low.

First thing though is can HP deliver on quality.

5ms is quite a standard response time to be specified for a modern VA model, in fact 4ms is more commonly specified. Meaningless anyway. And 3000:1 is the quite average for specified static contrast for a VA panel and instantly identifies the panel type as such. All others (IPS, TN and related) would have 1000:1 or at a stretch 1200:1 specified and a similar value measured. VA is either 3000:1 or 5000:1 specified and measured to be similar.
 
Back
Top Bottom