Caporegime
So you can explain then why it would ricochet instead of embed, should be easy for you. I'll wait.
Neither outcome is relevant. Basic physics. Think about it.
So you can explain then why it would ricochet instead of embed, should be easy for you. I'll wait.
Happy for you to explain it to meNeither outcome is relevant. Basic physics. Think about it.
The (unanswerable) question at the moment is whether CPS actually genuinely think something hasn't been done right and a murder charge is justified, or as I suspect the officers handing in their tickets believe, the CPS is throwing an officer under the bus to avoid a political / societal problem and the entire thing should never have gone beyond the IOPC.
Happy for you to explain it to me
Thank you! See why couldn't you just have said that from the startFirst of all, you're assuming the officer in a position to fire could see the tyres. The officers in front almost certainly couldn't.
Secondly the tyres on that car are almost certainly run flats. So you've just taken a shot with a chance of ricochet on a tyre that will still keep going when punctured.
Thirdly cars don't just suddenly become immobile when you shoot out a tyre. They have momentum. Wheels and tyres still grip when flat to allow acceleration even if the car is stationary. Especially with run flats.
Thank you! See why couldn't you just have said that from the start
At the first point - irrelavent, of course it was an assumption. I wouldn't be asking why they couldn't shoot the tyres if they I had assumed they could in no way see them.
Second point - I hadn't thought of run flats at all. Fair point. Why do you think the tyres would almost certainly be run flats though?
Third point - I'll take your word about run flats* then it'll not do much. The car however didn't have much momentum, it had stopped and was trying to ram its way out. As I said before, my assumption would be flat tyres (again assumption being completely flat) would provide less traction to do so against cars with intact tyres. I'm not expecting the car to suddenly stop moving with flat tyres, I was expecting the boxed in cars to be able to 'restrain' the car.
*For note - I've no experience with run flat tyres, so don't have any idea how they handle.
Yep, play silly games etc.
Fair enough.The tyres would almost certainly be runflats because of the make, model and manufacturing year of the car.
OK, my experience of attempting to bash my way past police with both inflated or flat tyres are zero.Even a stationary car with flat tyres will shift.
I'd say that was more than virtue signalling.
I don't disagree with de-escalation TBH. But if the footage could have been released before hand I do think a lot would have had a very different stance.Yeah, watching the footage it's kinda ridiculous it even went to trial, woke CPS and authorities worried about some BLM rent-a-mob types causing chaos. I guess London-wide riots have been started previously after a violent gangster gets shot by the police.
I mean, these to me are neither here nor there. I think there's enough feeling (rightly or wrongly) that the police do not police fairly. As such I see no issues with those, however, it depends on if they'd had seen the footage. Hindsight is great, but if you have no information to go off it's easy to see why people would be concerned and angered by someone being shot by the police. From memory, the moment things were telling were, IIRC, how the family went quiet after being shown the footage.Of course, Corbyn joined a protest:
Chris Kaba shooting: Jeremy Corbyn joins protest against ‘inherently racist’ police
Hundreds of people condemned the Metropolitan Police as “inherently racist” during a demonstration outside New Scotland Yard amid rising anger over the death of Chris Kaba, who was fatally shot by a firearms officer. Jeremy Corbyn, the former Labour Party leader, and Bell Ribeiro-Addy, the Labour MPwww.thetimes.com
...and Khan did some virtue signalling:
He was shot in the head. Though he said he was aiming for the chest.That's when the fatal shot was taken. Exactly as per the book, with a single shot to chest.
As for the verdict, the cop should never have been charged in the first place.
BLM still going? I thought that collapsed after it's leaders were found to be massive fraudsters, who pocketed donations.