"Hundreds" of Met Police armed response officers hand in the weapons after colleague charged with murder - Chris Kaba Shooting aftermath.

Disgusting from the IOPC and the CPS, just disgusting. Clearly politically driven by the very top. The only real, fair result. Poor defendant. Risked his own life protecting others and had to endure all of this rubbish. Shame on those who reviewed the initial case.

I hope he writes a book and makes millions.
 
The (unanswerable) question at the moment is whether CPS actually genuinely think something hasn't been done right and a murder charge is justified, or as I suspect the officers handing in their tickets believe, the CPS is throwing an officer under the bus to avoid a political / societal problem and the entire thing should never have gone beyond the IOPC.

Well, now the bodycam footage is public and with jury reaching such a quick verdict, it would seem one of these two scenarios was far more likely and all the officers handing in their tickets were probably bang on the money.
 
Happy for you to explain it to me

First of all, you're assuming the officer in a position to fire could see the tyres. The officers in front almost certainly couldn't.

Secondly the tyres on that car are almost certainly run flats. So you've just taken a shot with a chance of ricochet on a tyre that will still keep going when punctured.

Thirdly cars don't just suddenly become immobile when you shoot out a tyre. They have momentum. Wheels and tyres still grip when flat to allow acceleration even if the car is stationary. Especially with run flats.
 
First of all, you're assuming the officer in a position to fire could see the tyres. The officers in front almost certainly couldn't.

Secondly the tyres on that car are almost certainly run flats. So you've just taken a shot with a chance of ricochet on a tyre that will still keep going when punctured.

Thirdly cars don't just suddenly become immobile when you shoot out a tyre. They have momentum. Wheels and tyres still grip when flat to allow acceleration even if the car is stationary. Especially with run flats.
Thank you! See why couldn't you just have said that from the start :)

At the first point - irrelavent, of course it was an assumption. I wouldn't be asking why they couldn't shoot the tyres if they I had assumed they could in no way see them.

Second point - I hadn't thought of run flats at all. Fair point. Why do you think the tyres would almost certainly be run flats though?

Third point - I'll take your word about run flats* then it'll not do much. The car however didn't have much momentum, it had stopped and was trying to ram its way out. As I said before, my assumption would be flat tyres (again assumption being completely flat) would provide less traction to do so against cars with intact tyres. I'm not expecting the car to suddenly stop moving with flat tyres, I was expecting the boxed in cars to be able to 'restrain' the car.

*For note - I've no experience with run flat tyres, so don't have any idea how they handle.
 
Thank you! See why couldn't you just have said that from the start :)

At the first point - irrelavent, of course it was an assumption. I wouldn't be asking why they couldn't shoot the tyres if they I had assumed they could in no way see them.

Second point - I hadn't thought of run flats at all. Fair point. Why do you think the tyres would almost certainly be run flats though?

Third point - I'll take your word about run flats* then it'll not do much. The car however didn't have much momentum, it had stopped and was trying to ram its way out. As I said before, my assumption would be flat tyres (again assumption being completely flat) would provide less traction to do so against cars with intact tyres. I'm not expecting the car to suddenly stop moving with flat tyres, I was expecting the boxed in cars to be able to 'restrain' the car.

*For note - I've no experience with run flat tyres, so don't have any idea how they handle.

The tyres would almost certainly be runflats because of the make, model and manufacturing year of the car.

Even a stationary car with flat tyres will shift.
 

Yeah, watching the footage it's kinda ridiculous it even went to trial, woke CPS and authorities worried about some BLM rent-a-mob types causing chaos. I guess London-wide riots have been started previously after a violent gangster gets shot by the police.

Of course, Corbyn joined a protest:


...and Khan did some virtue signalling:

 
The jury came to the verdict in 3 hours. Sounds like it took them no time at all to see sense.

If you don't want shooting by the police, here's a top tip, if an armed officer stands in front of your car and shouts stop and put your hands up, DON'T put your hands up and then try and run him over in a brazen attempt to evade the police at any cost. If you're innocent, then comply, put your hands up and do as you're told and you won't get shot.

I'm not defending police brutality, I've seen plenty of videos in the US for example where they've been shot for absolutely no reason and the people blamed for Swatting at the people that call the police - not the police officers who murdered people for no reason. The UK does have its examples, just less than the US. john charles de menezes was innocent and was shot by a trigger happy police officer This is not that.

As for the ones saying "couldn't you shoot his tyres out" - this wasn't just about stopping him getting away. You can see just before he's shot an officer goes in front of the car to confront him head on, and he continues to try and ram the car forwards and obviously has no intention of stopping and was just going to run him over. That's when the fatal shot was taken
 
Last edited:
Yeah, watching the footage it's kinda ridiculous it even went to trial, woke CPS and authorities worried about some BLM rent-a-mob types causing chaos. I guess London-wide riots have been started previously after a violent gangster gets shot by the police.
I don't disagree with de-escalation TBH. But if the footage could have been released before hand I do think a lot would have had a very different stance.
Of course, Corbyn joined a protest:


...and Khan did some virtue signalling:

I mean, these to me are neither here nor there. I think there's enough feeling (rightly or wrongly) that the police do not police fairly. As such I see no issues with those, however, it depends on if they'd had seen the footage. Hindsight is great, but if you have no information to go off it's easy to see why people would be concerned and angered by someone being shot by the police. From memory, the moment things were telling were, IIRC, how the family went quiet after being shown the footage.

The only thing that stands out from what Khan said was that his death had a huge impact on Londoners. As a Londoner it had almost zero impact on me, and I don't think anyone else I know was impacted. Everything else he said in those tweets seems fine.

That's when the fatal shot was taken. Exactly as per the book, with a single shot to chest.
He was shot in the head. Though he said he was aiming for the chest.

Edit: Having a look at the video again, lucky purple wasn't injured by the shot.
 
Last edited:
Seeing the footage, there was never really a case against the cop. The guy was using a car as a weapon, he got stopped. The end.
 
Last edited:
BLM still going? I thought that collapsed after it's leaders were found to be massive fraudsters, who pocketed donations.

Those signs are the standard rent-a-mob/Socialist Worker Party signs I think, they turn up at any leftist protest and hand out that sort of stuff with a relevant slogan etc.
 
Back
Top Bottom