The Auris is about to get a 2.0 hybrid with 180bhp isn't it? So it'll go better too.
Ha look at all you noobs in your double digit fuel economy. Real cars stay in single figures.
50MPG....... Wow!!!!!!!!
So it's not really improved in the 15 odd years since the Gen 2.
Tech demo my ***. Now the Insight on the other hand
50mpg if in town is good. But combined it's not that great by modern standards, even some petrol cars are doing that now.
Are we talking book figures or real world ones?
My petrol c class had a book figure of 50.8mpg for combined, in reality, it would be 30-32 in mixed driving and as a long term average, with 42-45mpg on a long run.
I changed to an hyundai ioniq hybrid (not plug in) just coming up to 2 months ago, and after the first 1200 miles doing the same commute etc that would get me 30mpg in the merc, am achieving 64mpg, which is massively different. I haven't done any long runs (100 miles plus) yet, so don't know what I will get, but general view is 70+ is easily achievable. (the ioniq, unlike the prius, can do electric only at motorway speeds, although by the book its a bit less efficient in town).
I used to get 40mpg in a Fiesta ST and the official figure is 47. On the motorway it would get over 50.
The problem with these hybrids is at higher speeds they get way less efficient. I doubt it will get near 70mpg really.
I don't believe 70mpg for a second. Dad is on his second Auris Hybrid, he's never seen more than 48mpg on a run at the legal limit.
petrol hybrids don't do well at high speeds on long motorway journeys. that is where you would want a diesel or a diesel hybrid.
petrol hybrids are city cars.
it would be like seeing if a diesel does good mpg in rush hour traffic where it moves 5 miles in an hour. they weren't built for that purpose.
where did you get that statement from?
we regularly do trips from bidford to Watford and get between 65 and 72mpg on the dash, real world take 3mpg off that.