Ice Bucket Challenge

No, but over £2million is money that has been raised as a direct consequence of this "fad". So, why do you dislike this again?

£2m for what has turned into an internet phenomenon? Sounds like a lot of money to us but in the grand scheme of things and the sheer size of this fad it's not a great amount. That amount could be a boatload more had people done the right thing and actually given money or given people info on how to donate as well.
 
£2m for what has turned into an internet phenomenon? Sounds like a lot of money to us but in the grand scheme of things and the sheer size of this fad it's not a great amount. That amount could be a boatload more had people done the right thing and actually given money or given people info on how to donate as well.

Yet it wouldn't have been raised had this fad not happened. So I ask again, what is your beef with that?
 
£2m for what has turned into an internet phenomenon? Sounds like a lot of money to us but in the grand scheme of things and the sheer size of this fad it's not a great amount. That amount could be a boatload more had people done the right thing and actually given money or given people info on how to donate as well.

I also think it's far better if people donate to and encourage others to donate a charity of their choice. Spread the cash around a bit.

I already give plenty to charities I care about via Give As You Earn which is much more tax efficient. So I won't be participating, thanks! :p
 
£2m for what has turned into an internet phenomenon? Sounds like a lot of money to us but in the grand scheme of things and the sheer size of this fad it's not a great amount. That amount could be a boatload more had people done the right thing and actually given money or given people info on how to donate as well.

It is a boat load more as most people have been donating.
That's just mnda, ALS was at $85m 2 days ago. MacMillan as far as I can see haven't released any figures.
But you get the idea. It is a lot in the grand scheme of things and despite the boring farts in here, shows most people have been donating and talking about the charity etc.
 
So just found out only 27% of the money raised goes towards research into a cure.

So wheres the rest of the money going? Whos pockets are being lined here?

Here are the salaries for the leadership of the group

Jane H. Gilbert – President and CEO – $339,475.00
Daniel M. Reznikov – Chief Financial Officer – $201,260.00
Steve Gibson – Chief Public Policy Officer – $182,862.00
Kimberly Maginnis - Chief of Care Services Officer – $160,646.00
Lance Slaughter - Chief Chapter Relations and Development Officer – $152,692.00

Michelle Keegan – Chief Development Officer – $178,744.00
John Applegate – Association Finance Officer – $118.726.00
David Moses – Director of Planned Giving – $112,509.00
Carrie Munk – Chief Communications and Marketing Officer – $142,875.00
Patrick Wildman – Director of Public Policy – $112,358.00
Kathi Kromer – Director of State Advocacy – $110,661.00

Jesus christ....


This is the main reason I don't give my money to any charities any more.
 
This is the main reason I don't give my money to any charities any more.

To be fair dollars always look more than they are actually worth, the conversion rate is about 1 to 0.6 at the moment, so the salaries are actually between about £200K to £60K.
£200k might be considered too much, but it is the top job, and a charity with poor leadership is far worse than a overly paid one; £60k is a moderate salary for the position it is for.
 
This is the main reason I don't give my money to any charities any more.

There are plenty of charities who are worthy and don't have a board of directors on massive wages and a huge mountain of cash sat there *cough* RSPCA *cough*.

Just takes a bit of research to find them.
 
To be fair dollars always look more than they are actually worth, the conversion rate is about 1 to 0.6 at the moment, so the salaries are actually between about £200K to £60K.
£200k might be considered too much, but it is the top job, and a charity with poor leadership is far worse than a overly paid one; £60k is a moderate salary for the position it is for.



Never convert $-£ on things like this as it don't work out. I.E the cost of living\houses\bills\petrol are lower.

But anyway...
 
Yet it wouldn't have been raised had this fad not happened. So I ask again, what is your beef with that?

You don't seem to understand.

My 'beef' is that it's becoming less about raising money and more about getting Facebook likes etc.

I think it's great that millions has been raised, but believe that a lot more could have come of it if people had done it properly.

Of the people I have seen as friends or friends of friends take part, only 2 have explained how to donate. 2. Out of hundreds. That simply isn't right.
 
You don't seem to understand.

My 'beef' is that it's becoming less about raising money and more about getting Facebook likes etc.

I think it's great that millions has been raised, but believe that a lot more could have come of it if people had done it properly.

Of the people I have seen as friends or friends of friends take part, only 2 have explained how to donate. 2. Out of hundreds. That simply isn't right.

But the only reason it works is because of the people who care about getting Facebook likes. There is no way of "doing it properly," this is the best compromise. If 5 million people do it and only 1/5 of them donate £5, that's still £5 million.

Yes, there are a lot of idiots and yes, their attention seeking is annoying, but that's a reason to find new friends, not to bash the whole thing.
 
You don't seem to understand.

My 'beef' is that it's becoming less about raising money and more about getting Facebook likes etc.

I think it's great that millions has been raised, but believe that a lot more could have come of it if people had done it properly.

Of the people I have seen as friends or friends of friends take part, only 2 have explained how to donate. 2. Out of hundreds. That simply isn't right.
And yet, this isn't what has happened. As the figures show.
 
Been nominated will do it not that I usually need encouragement to do nasty things to myself just Alcohol... like the time involving a bottle of Tobasco and my privates... Don't do it it burns when you pee!
 
My partners Mum is suffering from motor neuron disease and it really is a terrible condition. Even if people aren't donating its putting this supposedly rare condition into the limelight so hopefully one day they can map the faulty gene and figure out a cure.
 
I shall post a vid this evening after I perform said Ice Bucket Challenge if you're referring to the Tabasco incident sadly no footage was taken I believe pics of my pained expression and state after said incident had taken place remain but I have no idea who holds them... Which is rather disconcerting from my viewpoint at any rate.
 
I'm sick to death of it.

Raising money for a worthy cause? Great.
Dumping ice on your head to look popular on social media sites? Pathetic.

The majority of people aren't giving details of how to donate or donated themselves which is the whole point of doing this. It's turned into a popularity contest and I'll have no part of it.

Well said.

Cretins need to realise that Facebook "Likes" do not translate into money for charity.

Heh.

 
Back
Top Bottom