Inconsiderate & slow drivers

People dawdling doesn't bother me nearly as much as people who don't or can't indicate correctly on roundabouts. Seriously, I hope these people have crash. Lazy, inconsiderate ******s.
 
theone8181;30481654 said:

It doesn't .. it will ease past 90% of cars on the road at that power, only 'fast' cars would be able to prevent it from overtaking if it was already accelerating past. 220bhp is more than enough power on a car that size for public roads.
 
ttaskmaster;30479404 said:
Given how fast I'm often going - Yes, I brake to a few mph below the limit.
Kinda what you do in order to avoid getting flashed, really.

Now, those who brake whenever the road even slightly deviates from dead-straight... those are annoying... along with the ones who come up behind a *slightly* slower vehicle and keep touching the brake every 10-15 seconds!


Again, have done this myself, more on countryside twisties where there are frequently nasty hazards just round the bend, or on tight corners where I know people run wide (have had to mount the kerb more than once), but especially at night.
Same for in town, given how many iPhone Ninjas think it's hilarious to step out in front of your vehicle, dressed all in black with hood up and earphones in, from behind a parked car or something...

Again, could be many reasons - Perhaps they didn't spot the speed change, or are limping home on a space saver wheel .

Calm down.... relax... put some Classic FM on...

Or if you prefer, just blaze off at high speed, bibbing your horn as you blast past, before slipping off the road, smacking into a tree and firing yourself through the windscreen just like some bloke did a couple of weeks ago outside our house.

Ridiculous response.

First of all you admit you have to brake suddenly at speed cameras because of 'how fast you are often going', then you respond to my post that I will wrap my car round a tree because I admit I may safely overtake a car doing 40 in a 60 limit :rolleyes:

You will never get a speed camera ticket going below 35mph in 30 (I've been going through them for 25 years) so calm down you don't have to panic and drop to 27mph.;)
 
It's amazing how many drivers don't indicate going around roundabouts and when overtaking.

Dare I say it's time for driving license refreshers every 'x' years. Would certainly show people how complacent they are while driving
 
I went a few weeks of over-taking the same woman in a corsa wafting along annoyingly slow in the morning. Not even 40 in a 60, more like 30-35. Also braking for cars coming the other way, etc

I think if your getting to that point, it's time to hand your licence in. Nervous and hesitant drivers are a hazard.
 
sja360;30481791 said:
It's amazing how many drivers don't indicate going around roundabouts and when overtaking.

Dare I say it's time for driving license refreshers every 'x' years. Would certainly show people how complacent they are while driving

People who indicate left after an overtake frustrate me. It's pretty obvious you're going to get back into the left lane rather that hit that oncoming car, your indication is not required.
 
sja360;30481791 said:
It's amazing how many drivers don't indicate going around roundabouts and when overtaking.

Dare I say it's time for driving license refreshers every 'x' years. Would certainly show people how complacent they are while driving

People who don't indicate on roundabouts are a pain but at least it gives you a heads up to give them lots of space, it's the ones that's just seem to randomly spam their indicator just because they feel it should be flashing even if it's not flashing the right way that are a real danger.
 
Basher;30482004 said:
People who indicate left after an overtake frustrate me. It's pretty obvious you're going to get back into the left lane rather that hit that oncoming car, your indication is not required.

You're supposed to indicate, why do you get miffed by people who are doing what they should be doing in accordance with the highway code?
 
mrk;30482038 said:
You're supposed to indicate, why do you get miffed by people who are doing what they should be doing in accordance with the highway code?

I don't have a problem with signalling to overtake, I just see no justification (and I'm pretty sure the Highway code doesn't either) for signalling that you're pulling back into the left lane, assuming the road ahead of you is clear (i.e. you're not squeezing back in between two cars.

It's the same on the motorway if you're pulling back into the inside lane after an overtake - no need to signal.
 
It's pretty clear, you should always give a clear signal when you are changing course or direction.

Rule 103

Signals warn and inform other road users, including pedestrians (see ‘Signals to other road users), of your intended actions. You should always

give clear signals in plenty of time, having checked it is not misleading to signal at that time
use them to advise other road users before changing course or direction, stopping or moving off

Signalling allows other road users to be aware of a vehicle changing direction, no matter how obvious it might be to you, it might not be to someone else.

Mirror
Signal
Manoeuvre

I take it this wasn't taught to you during driving lessons then? :p
 
mrk;30482101 said:
It's pretty clear, you should always give a clear signal when you are changing course or direction.



Signalling allows other road users to be aware of a vehicle changing direction, no matter how obvious it might be to you, it might not be to someone else.

Mirror
Signal
Manoeuvre

I take it this wasn't taught to you during driving lessons then? :p

As I said, I do signal before I carry out the manoeuvre (the overtake). It was absolutely taught during my driving lesson.

Take a read of the overtaking section of the highway code, there is no mention of needing to signal after you complete the overtake. You should signal when changing course, (of course), but after initially pulling out for the overtake I'm not really changing course - it's one smooth move past the car in front.
 
The worst thing about this time of year is the utter cretins with their rear fog lights on as soon as there's a tiny bit of mist about 3 miles away.
Following these utter penii at 40mph in the dark is not at all fun. Therefore I go with Housey's method (well, as close as I can to it)
 
Basher;30482133 said:
As I said, I do signal before I carry out the manoeuvre (the overtake). It was absolutely taught during my driving lesson.

Take a read of the overtaking section of the highway code, there is no mention of needing to signal after you complete the overtake. You should signal when changing course, (of course), but after initially pulling out for the overtake I'm not really changing course - it's one smooth move past the car in front.

You are indeed hanging course for the initial movement out from behind the car you wish to overtake.

However you are then changing course again, to move back in front of said car.

An overtake is two separate movements, and you follow the mirror, signal, maneuver for each separate movement.

Movement one, from following car you wish to overtake, mirror, signal right, maneuver out from behind the car and accelerate to overtake.

Movement two, once past, mirror to check you are clear and there is room, signal left, then maneuver back into original lane you started from.
 
Jono;30482614 said:
The worst thing about this time of year is the utter cretins with their rear fog lights on as soon as there's a tiny bit of mist about 3 miles away.
Following these utter penii at 40mph in the dark is not at all fun. Therefore I go with Housey's method (well, as close as I can to it)

Tbf round these parts I'd rather have to deal with that then the people who never turn their lights on at all.
 
My major gripes are with those drivers who:

1) Drive too slowly for the road.
2) Drive too fast for the road (Just because it's a NSL road, does not mean you have to go 60 if it's a windy narrow country lane, same with going 40 in a 30)
3) Tractors that drive on dual carriage ways (should be illegal)
4) Tailgators, I usually slow right down if someone gets too close.
 
Entai;30482685 said:
You are indeed hanging course for the initial movement out from behind the car you wish to overtake.

However you are then changing course again, to move back in front of said car.

An overtake is two separate movements, and you follow the mirror, signal, maneuver for each separate movement.

Movement one, from following car you wish to overtake, mirror, signal right, maneuver out from behind the car and accelerate to overtake.

Movement two, once past, mirror to check you are clear and there is room, signal left, then maneuver back into original lane you started from.

What you're saying makes sense, I'm just relaying what I was taught and what has subsequently been backed up by a driving instructor friend; signal to move out but a left signal to move in is not necessary (where else are you going to go?).
 
Tailgaters are my gripe. There's absolutely no need to be sat on the rear bumper when I'm doing the speed limit. People like that a seriously dangerous and often go for ridiculous overtakes at the worst possible times.
 
I was in front of someone today with a broken headlight, so one of them is full beam all of the time. So annoying!! granted he probably wasn't aware it was like that, but even so.
 
Back
Top Bottom