Independent Schools

Soldato
Joined
31 May 2005
Posts
15,640
Location
Nottingham
Both myself and my wife had a state education and neither of us have any problems admitting our education could have been better but both agree our time at school was fun and enjoyable but obviously would like better for our own children.

I admit that I was once very narrow minded regarding Independent schools and was one of the "Never did me any harm" brigade but since the recent birth of our first child, we have been discussing the merits of our children being taught in an independent school.

We do not live in the best of areas and although the state school is OK, I would have course like better for my child.

We are not millionaires but by choosing holidays more wisely and general thriftyness, an independent schooling would be a possibility. We are not talking about boarding schools, just independent schools.

Also, I read different sources saying that same sex schools often benefit the pupils, girls more so as they obviously mature at a different level to boys.

Any input appreciated from both sides of the camp.

Discuss.
 
I got funded into a independent school for the last 2 years of my schooling years.

Cannot say it was much better then any other crap hole i went, and i got kicked outa every GCSE as those pricks are strict! :)
 
Personally i dont think there is a differnce as long as you get a decent school. I went to Burnside High which is a bit rough, but it was a great laugh and i came otu with 2xBs and 5XCs i think, which i was happy with as it was enough to get me onto A Levels.

Personally id rather go to a normal school than a paid for one, but i suppose it depends on what you as the parents want. Also, a lot of the people ive met that have came out of private schools have been a bit more up themselves, but thats not always the case.
 
sniffy said:
Not worth the money, nor the person your child will likely turn into.

Just my opinion.

and mine, don't mean to downgrade myself but look at me. I am hardly Einstein and a goody two shoes, mostly the kids parents were loaded and they were all big headed.

I was funded so was the poor one, and they were scared of me calling me a 'fighter' even though they didn't even know me
 
I've been to all sides, started off at state school till 13, then to mixed private till 16, then to single sex private till 18, so i think i have a pretty good view of it all.

I don't have a very high view of most state schools, although it does depend, some are very good, but if its just a bog standard local school like mine was, then i don't think it could cultivate a bright mind, they just have too much else to deal with than to single out smarter kids.

My time at a mixed private school was very good, obviously thats just my own opinion, and maybe they don't do as well as single sex schools, but i found that the kind of people who educated from that school were a lot more rounded and definitely more sociable people. Single sex schools i find are quite highly focused, especially ones that expect excellent results, my school was all about oxford / cambridge, and if you didn't fit that mould (like me) then theres an element of being a second class citizen.

I'm hardly a genius, like you my parents just about scraped the money together to give me a good education, along with a lot of other people at independent schools. But i think it was well worth the money, i definitely wouldn't be where i am now without it, but additionally i'm glad that i've also been in the state system.

My one criticism of independent schools however is that most have big problems with drugs and alcohol, much more so than state schools, simply because these little rich kids have the means to get hold of them in plentiful quantities, it's something very serious that most independent schools gloss over quite successfully.

I say go with your gut feeling, if you don't think your local state school can do your child justice, then do everything you can to find a good mixed independent.
 
I went to Christ's Hospital School in Horsham (mixed boarding school)- really really good school. miss it a lot and im 26 now :)

The boarding side of things was a little daunting to begin with, but i ended up really liking it- made some very good friends and contacts.

from a financial point of view, its unique- fees are calculated according to your means- my mum was a single parent with no income- we paid zero fees...the whole thing is a charity designed to give all children an equal chance. all you have to do is pass the entrance exams...

the quality of the education on offer is excellent- most of the teachers when i was there held doctorates in thier subjects and the class sizes were a quarter the size of the classes in my sister's school

in my experience, independant schools offer more choice of subjects, teachers with a real passion for thier subjects, smaller class sizes and infinitely better facilities. my school had its own proper sports centre, working theatre (working as in it was used for commercial productions), scouts unit, cadets unit, 800 acres of sports pitches (for 900 pupils!), and it was all set in the countryside- it was all tree line avenues and grand buildings with great views...thinking back on it, it was amazing...

eep! nostalgic babbling! sorry bout that!
 
there was some study that boys only schools result in better exams results for the kids, cant remember exactly.

In terms of expense you could hope hes a genius and gets a scholarship, though schools like my old one had funds and such too.

I think it is great, you do get better opportunities, facilities, and such - wouldn't trade it for the world personally.

Anyhow, to counter some of the points he raised :

First off there is a massive reverse bias to the top private schools, my school in particular for cambridge saw huge drop offs in the number of sucessful applications.

Results are what the student makes of the resources/what his attitude is towards the school - going to an independent school doesnt mean good results - a few from my school merely got ok results - but it does help that you are more spoon fed than state schools (a good and bad thing).

\/ one masssive essay below :)
 
Last edited:
sniffy said:
Not worth the money, nor the person your child will likely turn into.

Just my opinion.

You're perfectly entitled to your opinion, but I'd just like to disagree with your assumption that those who are privately educated turn into some particular, stereotypical 'bad' person.

As I come to the end of my education (only three weeks left!) I suppose I'm in a good position to answer your questions from a student's point of view. Firstly, the education your child receives during its junior years will be largely irrelevant to their future success and ability. Therefore, to save money, I'd suggest state schooling until senior school.

Thereafter, you must consider firstly the cost of your nearest independent school. They do vary greatly, but as you mentioned, it isn't a boarding school, so we're probably looking at £7,000 - £12,000 per year. Don't assume you'll have to pay all of that, because depending on your income, you may be able to apply for bursaries (or your son/daughter may be offered a scholarship). This can sometimes reduce the cost significantly, and I know of many who are only paying 50%. Again, this is entirely dependent on your income, but I believe if it's < £30,000 per annum, a bursary may be a very real possibility.

There's the debate on the actual worth of an independent education. You must compare the performance of your nearest private school to your local state school. If your nearest state school is one of the worst in the country, there are going to be issues and your child won't have anywhere near as many opportunities, will have a very poor education, and the general atmosphere won't necessarily be one which promotes hard work. On the other hand, the best state schools rival many private schools. Something to consider.

Having attended an independent school for a long time, I can personally say it's worth the money. I, and many of my friends and fellow students would not have achieved what we have without this school. The reason? Not spoonfeeding (believe it or not, the reason we do better is because of better teaching). It's the atmosphere and work ethic. It's not 'uncool' to work hard and do your homework. The teachers are able to teach in lessons more easily as class sizes are smaller and pupils are less disruptive. The benefit isn't only from the better teachers, but also from other students. This becomes very evident during GCSE and A-levels. Had we been at various state schools in my city, where the atmosphere is very different, we wouldn't be coming out with the same academic achievement. Nor would we have the same extra-curricular opportunities. Universities place massive weight on academic achievement, so it also affects which university you go to. Ignore the fact that universities are allegedly actively recruiting greater numbers from state schools; there is still a significant independent schooling advantage.

Back to the cost of it, the extra money spent on your child's education may or may not be offset by their increased earnings as a result of a stronger educational background. This also depends how hard they work; sure, the school will make them work harder, but as parents your push is equally important. Just as a small piece of information, from my year group of 105, about 9 are going to oxbridge, and something like 70-80% of the group are going to attend other top 25 universities. Now, people will argue against university, and for starting at the bottom and working your way up. However, I don't want to start an university debate. Others will argue that it doesn't matter which uni, which course, but the person. Sure, to a certain extent, the person matters. However, so does the course and university. Let's consider areas such as Law, Medicine and Investment Banking. All very lucrative and high flying. To work for the biggest companies, you have to have a top university education. Why take the risk in sending your son/daughter to a state school, not being sure of entry to a top university? It can and will affect their future, should they have ambitions to reach the top. I hope no one quotes single examples (e.g. Alan Sugar) to argue against this. Look at the bigger picture and see that most of the folk at the top are top 10 uni grads.

To follow on, briefly, to use an example which I know a bit about... at the biggest investment banks (Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, etc), most of their new recruits come from LSE, Oxford, Cambridge and Imperial. They often don't bother looking at or considering anyone else. That's the reality.

On your question about all girls/boys schools, I've definitely heard they're beneficial. A lot of the best schools in the country are like this and it's a system which seems to work well, education wise.

Finally, I'd like to add a bit about the generalisation about the people from independent schools. Just because someone's parents pay for their education, does not make them bad people. Just because they attend a school which has high performance and an academic atmosphere does not mean they are deprived of other life skills. There seems to be a misconception that their personalities are bad or they lack common sense, etc. etc. If this was true, why is it that people from both sides seem to mix day-to-day and live in harmony? About being 'big-headed', this is an utter generalisation, and isn't to do with the school. The big-headed ones are often the highest achievers; I believe anyone who gets excellent results, regardless of their school, could be big-headed about them, for example. We're not all posh, in fact, most of us aren't anywhere near. We're not all rich. Nowhere near; sure more of us have family incomes higher than the national average, but that's irrelevant. We're not all stuck-up tories; you'd be surprised how many are labour supporters ;). Less than 1% appear to be any kind of 'stuck up'. There's very little snobbery. People who believe these generalisations should stop looking at single examples, stop looking at the top 10 boarding schools in the country, and definitely stop looking at Eton. They are definitely not representative.

Gimpymoo, if you have any questions about independent education and whatnot, fire me an email (in trust) if you want :).
 
i went to a public school, got 2bs, 5cs 2ds and an e (spanish) :p
then went to college and got 3dist 5metits 8 passes. now at uni on work placement. I really enjoyed school for all the friends I had and the general good times. (same with college and uni)

One of my mates was put into a private school for a couple of years then a different private school and a boarding school. He eventually went to the same upper school as me and got 3ds. Now working for his grandads fencing company.

I think it depends if your child wants to do well. My mum and dad also left it completely up to me what i wanted to do which im glad about. I think ive turned out ok
 
N9ne - Interesting post. You do make some valid points.

By the way, I don't nessecerily mean a bad person as you put it. Just from my experience (granted, from a small number of cases so take what I say for what it is), a little deluded (for the lack of a better word) from how the real world actually works. They find it hard to socialise properly with groups outside of their own (this can be said for state -> private too but not to the same extent) and generally quite up themselves. I wouldn't personally sacrifice those traits in my child (and my wallet!) for a head-start so to speak. If your child wants to achieve well, they will in a state school.

I would take the private root though if the local school was very dodgy/completely pap. By the way you mentioned being big headed is granted if you achieve well. No one has a problem with acknowledging someones achievement, but when it's the only pap they spout and they think they're a better person for it then no it isn't.
 
Last edited:
sniffy said:
N9ne - Interesting post. You do make some valid points.

By the way, I don't nessecerily mean a bad person as you put it. Just from my experience (granted, from a small number of cases so take what I say for what it is), a little deluded (for the lack of a better word) from how the real world actually works. They find it hard to socialise properly with groups outside of their own (this can be said for state -> private too) and generally quite up themselves. I wouldn't personally sacrifice those traits in my child (and my wallet!) for a head-start so to speak. If your child wants to achieve well, they will in a state school.

I would take the private root though if the local school was very dodgy/completely pap. By the way you mentioned being big headed is granted if you achieve well. No one has a problem with acknowledging someones achievement, but not when it's the only pap they spout and they think they're a better person for it.

Who have you met, not ever met so many that are as you described (unless i was taking a stroll through etons picturesque campus :P)
 
spirit said:
Who have you met, not ever met so many that are as you described (unless i was taking a stroll through etons picturesque campus :P)

Kids from private schooling, funnily enough. ;)
 
Well, thank you all very much for the replies so far, especially Chimaera and N9ne, very usefull indeed.

N9ne, you mention about Indenpendent Junior schooling not being as beneficial as senior schooling. This is a thought I have had myself. My only concern was that our child would make friends at their State Junior school and then have to leave the majority of them when going to an Independent Senior school.

Has anyone here gone from a state Junior to an independent senior? How was the transition? As been mentioned, I would have thought that the social environment at an independent would be less intimidating for a newcomer?

sniffy said:
I would take the private root though if the local school was very dodgy/completely pap

My concern is that with my experience of state schools, a desire to learn is often greeted with distain by fellow pupils which can hinder the childs desire to learn and better themselves if they so wish. I get the impression that the desire to learn and do well is the norm in independent schools. Im not saying this is the case, simply my own current thoughts.
 
Last edited:
I went from a comprehensive (up to GCSE) to a grammar (for alevels) and the education I recieved at the grammar was much better. However it really does depend on the school though. I changed from a school ranked quite highly (top 40% or so nationally) to one in the top 10, which may explain why i thought it was much better. IMO the teaching was generally better and the classes moved faster than the my friends who stayed at the comprehensive. However, outside of education there is far more on offer with regards to sport, music, drama..etc compared to my first school. The level of career guidance was also superior and that is the main reason that i am studying medicine now and not chemistry/chemical engineering.

I cant really comment on what people are like at independent schools for attitude and money, because grammar schools are far more mixed as attendence is on ability, rather than ability to pay. The mix of backgrounds was similar between the 2 schools because of this and it was not full of snobby people like the OC (which is what i expected when i went to the open day :D ).

Overall if the school is highly rated and affordable IMO you should go for it
 
Last edited:
can't comment for all schools but at mine;

if you transfered at AS level, it was much harder on many levels:

it was harder to get in.
it was harder to 'fit in' 'cause most of the people had a well established group / friends who for last 3 years etc.

but then again most of the poeple who transfered were foreign (and just kept to themselves really) & the odd 1/2 managed to integrate themselves well...

+ i persoanlly wouldn't want to transfer at that point in education, cause of friends and such.
 
Gimpymoo said:
Well, thank you all very much for the replies so far, especially Chimaera and N9ne, very usefull indeed.

N9ne, you mention about Indenpendent Junior schooling not being as beneficial as senior schooling. This is a thought I have had myself. My only concern was that our child would make friends at their State Junior school and then have to leave the majority of them when going to an Independent Senior school.

Has anyone here gone from a state Junior to an independent senior? How was the transition? As been mentioned, I would have thought that the social environment at an independent would be less intimidating for a newcomer?

Most of the people at my school came from a state junior school. They had absolutely no trouble during the transition.

I wish to respond to those who say a child will achieve well and reach their potential regardless of the school they go to. This isn't true. Sure, you have the occassional success story of someone with 10 A*s at a rubbish state school, but this is rare. Saying they'll do well wherever is assuming their education is independent of teaching, environment, atmosphere etc. Undoubtedly, someone who is smart will do well wherever they attend. However, that's just "well". These days, with university entry becoming incredibly competitive, (look at oxbridge, imperial, LSE), people need to reach their absolute potential. This isn't easy at all at a state school, in fact, it must be near impossible. At my school, there are numerous people with 6 A*+ at GCSE (taking my yeargroup of 105 as a sample). There are many with AAAA to AAAAAA at AS, and many with 90%+ at A2. Some of this is definitely a result of the school. That extra quality, those extra facilities, that more academic atmosphere, that acceptance of intelligence amongst your peers does help. We're not just talking about achieving 5 A*-C at GCSE anymore, that's not enough for the top universities. We're talking about 5-10 A*s. Things have moved on, and to get into the top universities, you continually need better GCSEs and AS grades. Soon, LSE, Oxford and Cambridge will all consider UMS scores (Cambridge already do). Soon, they will be able to make offers based on individual units (e.g. achieve an A in all six A2 modules). This year, LSE rejected every Economics applicant who didn't have 6 A*s or more at GCSE. I believe they shafted anyone with a B or two at GCSE too. (just for this course, incredibly competitive). At Oxbridge, 10+ A*s at GCSE are no guarantee anymore. This year, thousands of people around the country with AAAA-AAAAA at AS were rejected from top unis.
 
Back
Top Bottom