Wasn't it $129-$139?
I thought they were joking about it being $129 or $130.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Wasn't it $129-$139?
Well, how low are Intel willing to on margins?Yes I think given a few generations Intel will be competitive at the midrange down. They don't need to be the fastest if they have good price to performance.
They were but Steve rounded up the marketing figures of $129-$139 to $130-$140.I thought they were joking about it being $129 or $130.
Yes I think until they're competitive they'll do just that, like AMD and Ryzen. Once established they'll bring the full power of their marketing and margins to bearWell, how low are Intel willing to on margins?
In terms of perf/area and perf/transistors what we've so far is pretty poor, so that implies to give good perf/cost they'll have go very low in their margins.
Smart move for them to approach from mid range first instead of head first at top end so they don't get a bad rep and can build the product with less scrutiny on performanceYes I think given a few generations Intel will be competitive at the midrange down. They don't need to be the fastest if they have good price to performance.
Yes won't be an easy task, if they can't do it I can't ever see us getting a third player.They have to hit the shelves first! Then survive the OcUK gauntlet of driver quality before they even get a sniff of that 80% mindshare!
I imagine given relative performance of the 380 the 750 will probably be around 3060 levels if we're lucky, but the price will probably be more competitive
in an AMD system the CPU will refuse to talk though and you have to go through an intermediator like the CPUs mum via text messagesHAH just realised.
13:10 with intel engineer he's bragging that because they're Intel they can communicate with the cpu.
Maybe they can harness them smarts to work out how to be equally performant on their competitors cpus, low bar that it is.
Old habit of trying to cripple performance on AMD cpus is gonna look real dumb if it means their gpus suck more than necessary.
Beats the 3060, price is key.
Intel reveals Arc A750 desktop graphics card performance in five games, faster than GeForce RTX 3060 - VideoCardz.com
Intel Arc A750 to compete with GeForce RTX 3060 Ryan Shrout (Intel Graphics marketing) presents Intel’s Arc A750 discrete GPU, the first high-performance desktop model that is set to launch later this summer. Intel Arc A750, Source: Intel Intel’s upcoming desktop GPU based on ACM-G10 processor...videocardz.com
I'll bet it will perform best on a higher end Intel platform, you just know there will be some shenanigans"Performance varies by use, configuration and other factors. See system configurations and disclaimers for further details"
Have you got a link to that? Where Ryan Shrout is concerned all that information will be critical.
I'll bet it will perform best on a higher end Intel platform, you just know there will be some shenanigans