Soldato
Will suit the intel mindshare, lets see how they fair later on when things have settled and we know exactly how they perform across a variety of system specs.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Intel Arc series unveiled with the Alchemist dGPU to arrive in Q1 2022
- Thread starter CAT-THE-FIFTH
- Start date
Hm, state of flux. TPU and W1zzard can usually be relied on to update their GPU database, but it still list only A380, A770, and A780.
No A750 there. It might be another cut-down DG2-515. Maybe similar to the A730M and it's a 3/4 of the full die?
Or they've come to their sense and have renamed them all lower. If top end DG2-512 isn't quick enough, call it A760 instead?
It doesn't sound great until you see what the majority are gaming on. Priced right it would be a nice upgrade for those on old slow cards. This place is unusual, most have a nice system, but even then only a minority buy the really high end.
Soldato
If its supposed to be this 3070 competitor, it soon sunk a tier in the blink of an eye and under the carpet it seems!
its just about beating a 3060 in select games, 3060... not even a TI....
Soldato
I thought it looked stuttery and thought I could see tearing in that video.Beats the 3060, price is key.
Intel reveals Arc A750 desktop graphics card performance in five games, faster than GeForce RTX 3060 - VideoCardz.com
Intel Arc A750 to compete with GeForce RTX 3060 Ryan Shrout (Intel Graphics marketing) presents Intel’s Arc A750 discrete GPU, the first high-performance desktop model that is set to launch later this summer. Intel Arc A750, Source: Intel Intel’s upcoming desktop GPU based on ACM-G10 processor...videocardz.com
Seems PCGH somehow got a table from somewhere:
www.pcgameshardware.de
So ACM-G10 is the same as TPU called DG2-512. So that implies the the A750 limited edition is 3/4 of the full die, while A580 is cut straight in two.
Since TSMC 6nm wafers aren't cheap but should have similar yields to 7nm, I can't figure out the half-die cut. Especially since TPU also think it's around 400mm².
GA106 is 276mm² but of course Samsung 8nm. 12 billion transistors, whereas TPU has DG2-512 as 21 billion. 3/4 of which (I know some thing don't scale like that), is around 16 billion. So that implies they are matching RTX3060 performance (in the limited amount of modern games they are willing to pick for marketing benchmarks) with only 33% more transistors.
Do we have any idea about TPU? Guess RTX3060 isn't that great at around 170W (6600 XT is about 160W).
EDIT: seems the A750 board has 6-pin and 8-pin PCIe (good for 300W?), but it might be over-engineered as Shroud likes to shout.
Benchmarks zur Arc 750: Intel mit Performance-Vorschau, peilt RTX 3060 an [Update]
Update: Intel veröffentlicht einen Benchmark-Teaser zur Arc-750-Grafikkarte, für die es noch keine offiziellen Specs gibt.
So ACM-G10 is the same as TPU called DG2-512. So that implies the the A750 limited edition is 3/4 of the full die, while A580 is cut straight in two.
Since TSMC 6nm wafers aren't cheap but should have similar yields to 7nm, I can't figure out the half-die cut. Especially since TPU also think it's around 400mm².
GA106 is 276mm² but of course Samsung 8nm. 12 billion transistors, whereas TPU has DG2-512 as 21 billion. 3/4 of which (I know some thing don't scale like that), is around 16 billion. So that implies they are matching RTX3060 performance (in the limited amount of modern games they are willing to pick for marketing benchmarks) with only 33% more transistors.
Do we have any idea about TPU? Guess RTX3060 isn't that great at around 170W (6600 XT is about 160W).
EDIT: seems the A750 board has 6-pin and 8-pin PCIe (good for 300W?), but it might be over-engineered as Shroud likes to shout.
Cbf watching the whole thing, anything interesting like gaming performance, overclocking etc?
If you just want hard numbers no. If you want more general information as posted 47 minute mark on.
Caporegime
Right at 47 Minutes.
Shrout pushing using the iGPU for streaming with the ARC GPU, as if you can't do that with Nvidia and AMD GPU's, and Linus, the Nvenc encoder makes almost no difference to the frame rates no matter how much load the GPU is under, stop trying to crawl up Shrout's rear end.
Shrout pushing using the iGPU for streaming with the ARC GPU, as if you can't do that with Nvidia and AMD GPU's, and Linus, the Nvenc encoder makes almost no difference to the frame rates no matter how much load the GPU is under, stop trying to crawl up Shrout's rear end.
Given how badly the 380 fell off if the game was the wrong type I think any graph from intel showing performance will involve cherry picking at astronomical highs.
You're not gonna show your top card card beating a 3060 in F1 then losing to a 580 in GTAV are you. GTAV won't exist to you.
Wait for unrestricted 3rd party reviews
They were quite open about concentrating on DX12. And really, I think that those who were dreaming of 3080 / 3090 / 69xx performance were hopelessly optimistic. This is Intel's first try in many, many years.
Soldato
But when AMD faced such critique on titles where nvidia done better on DX11 there was no empathy, so it is only right they come under the same scrutiny!
Caporegime
Do you think they will come under the same scrutiny?But when AMD faced such critique on titles where nvidia done better on DX11 there was no empathy, so it is only right they come under the same scrutiny!
Soldato
We still hear echoes of the poor drivers from 2006, at least maybe another competitor can take over the crown and we can finally move on!