• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Intel Arc series unveiled with the Alchemist dGPU to arrive in Q1 2022

Exactly .. once he took it apart it started to look like cheap knock off, also all them stupid extra PCBs and cables are a joke really. What a mess really, I have seen prototypes of devices in better condition than that mess.
I literally change all my pads and thermal paste eventually, that card is a nightmare. I am also astonished about the effort and cost of that led strip.
 
WTH did I just watch?

Why on earth have they obviously spent so much money on making something so unnecessarily complicated and cumbersome to dismantle.

Hell, my 1080 is getting on now and I had to replace one of the fans a good while back - it took minutes. That thing looks more trouble than it's worth even attempting.
 
Perf/transistors is a metric where Arc is world class (sarc):
z7bR8Qw.png
So we might all be saving that Intel's value for money is lacking but that's because we are thinking in terms of value/perf, if we were thinking in terms of value/transistors then they come out on top!

Although what consumers want with transistors inefficiently used, I am not sure!
 
Hold on … lets get a bit real here. To take that card apart was pulling off a piece held on by some tape … and some screws. If you consider that hard … really? Come on.

Once Steve figured out the order of undoing bits, the cables and pcb bits all came apart from each other without too much fuss. The cables all pulled out between the holes in the parts easily. What made it a mess was Steve didn’t know the order of it. I bet you’d manage fine after doing a second card.

The reality is that the card can be dismantled and parts replaced … so if something goes on it, it can be fixed. If that means a few more screws than average , boohoo … get a grip. The faux outrage over things like this is a joke.
 
Paul's Hardware interestingly reported that he had no driver problems.


He shows clips from Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil, CP2077, Doom Eternal, Horizon Zero Dawn, Far Cry 6 and Dirt 5. He also tried XSS

Of note was that he was using a Ryzen 7950.
 
done deal, will be picking a few up for new systems in the office purely out of spite against AMD/Nvidia for the gouging and those lovely blue leds will go well with our corporate colour scheme :)
but in all seriousness its great to see intel stepping up and i'd like to think that as drivers are improved we will see them get even more out of these cards in terms of performance. their beefy in terms of spec so with the right drivers these could be the performance bargains of the year
 
Perf/transistors is a metric where Arc is world class (sarc):
z7bR8Qw.png
So we might all be saving that Intel's value for money is lacking but that's because we are thinking in terms of value/perf, if we were thinking in terms of value/transistors then they come out on top!

Although what consumers want with transistors inefficiently used, I am not sure!

As consumers we aren't buying cost for transistor, we are buying cost for performance.

I mean, this argument is entirely new, is this the new metric Intel would like us to adopt to judge value?

Its not our problem Intel can't make an efficient GPU, that's an Intel problem, we aren't stupid, we wont be paying for Intel's problems.
 
done deal, will be picking a few up for new systems in the office purely out of spite against AMD/Nvidia for the gouging and those lovely blue leds will go well with our corporate colour scheme :)
but in all seriousness its great to see intel stepping up and i'd like to think that as drivers are improved we will see them get even more out of these cards in terms of performance. their beefy in terms of spec so with the right drivers these could be the performance bargains of the year

As it is its equivalent to an RX 6600, which is $100 cheaper, its why Intel ignored AMD in all their presentations.

Its overpriced, and still broken.
 
The A770 on a top level view is very similar to GCN and Vega i.e loads of transistors and theoretical performance but master of none. I wonder if there is a good chunk of performance still left under the hood untapped due to software (given the size of the chip and number of transistors).
 
As it is its equivalent to an RX 6600, which is $100 cheaper, its why Intel ignored AMD in all their presentations.

Its overpriced, and still broken.
Yeh my uncle was looking for a new card and had heard about the Arcs, after seeing the reviews and the fact he has an older 2600 ryzen system, plays a lot of dx11,dx10 games I pointed him towards a £260 6600 Powercolor. Job done.

Sorry Intel but with all the issues with these cards, even at £150 I would still hesitate.
 
The A770 on a top level view is very similar to GCN and Vega i.e loads of transistors and theoretical performance but master of none. I wonder if there is a good chunk of performance still left under the hood untapped due to software (given the size of the chip and number of transistors).

Yeah Vega was also a brain child of Raja Kudori, it was never a good GPU and it never became a good GPU, it was just bad.
 
Back
Top Bottom