• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Intel demoes 11th Gen Core Rocket Lake CPU against 12-core AMD Ryzen

AMDs senior managers must be kaking there pants right now, they are worried Intel wont mention them 25 times in the presentation for Boiling lake or whatever this toss is called.
 
RavenXXX2 said:
https://youtu.be/WiZHFruiYac?t=1545

lol intel need to clue their staff up on AMD CPUs, r7 12 CORE. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

LMAO Is it one of those obscure/weird cpus one can pick up from china. :D

About 5-10 fps from the footage, not that impressive at all.

This is like testing a game with a 5600x vs a 5950x that doesnt scale well or require many cores then going look same performance. :confused:

Why didnt they compare this chip to a 10700k or 10900k?
 
Last edited:
Oh know, 5% performance gain at 1080P with what double the power and heat and 25% less cores. Rocket Lake seems totally pointless to me. I suppose form an Intel point of view it is great cause they know people will blindly buy it and because it is only 8 core has a limited life span as games start to use more and more cores. Waste of money. Wake me up when Intel have something interesting and i will contemplate moving back
 
cliffy said:
Oh know, 5% performance gain at 1080P with what double the power and heat and 25% less cores. Rocket Lake seems totally pointless to me. I suppose form an Intel point of view it is great cause they know people will blindly buy it and because it is only 8 core has a limited life span as games start to use more and more cores. Waste of money. Wake me up when Intel have something interesting and i will contemplate moving back
Click to expand...

well its in the name I guess lol ... Rocket
 
cliffy said:
Oh know, 5% performance gain at 1080P with what double the power and heat and 25% less cores. Rocket Lake seems totally pointless to me. I suppose form an Intel point of view it is great cause they know people will blindly buy it and because it is only 8 core has a limited life span as games start to use more and more cores. Waste of money. Wake me up when Intel have something interesting and i will contemplate moving back
Click to expand...
Spot on - it's just not competitive, at this level it's basically pointless to gain a few percentage points in some games - if you lose hugely on workloads with lots of threads and use vastly more power. The Zen 3 lineup are just more rounded products - no serious weak spots.
 
clv101 said:
Spot on - it's just not competitive, at this level it's basically pointless to gain a few percentage points in some games - if you lose hugely on workloads with lots of threads and use vastly more power. The Zen 3 lineup are just more rounded products - no serious weak spots.
Click to expand...
Afreed, i am sure people will buy it and that is there right but makes little to no sense to me at all. It is just a temportary stop gap for the fan boys
 
haszek said:
Similar single to AMD but lower multi
https://videocardz.com/newz/intel-c...ample-compared-with-core-i9-10900k-at-5-2-ghz
Click to expand...

Ouch. So still behind AMD in IPC.

11900k CBR20 single core: 610 points
5950x CBR20 single core: 640 points (you can get 670-690 with some very tight curve optimizer tweaks)

And the CPU score for the 11900k in Firestrike, Timespy and Timespy Extreme is lower than the 10900k




Intel really cherry picked it's benchmarks today

Let's take a look at some other games shall we :D

The 11900k does have consistently better minimum framerate than the 10900k, however its also consistently lower than the 10900k in average and maximum framerate

AC Valhalla

https://cdn.videocardz.com/1/2021/01/Intel-Core-i9-11900K-AC-Valhalla.jpg


Watch Dogs Legion

https://cdn.videocardz.com/1/2021/01/Intel-Core-i9-11900K-Cyberpunk2077.jpg


Shadow of the Tomb Raider

https://cdn.videocardz.com/1/2021/01/Intel-Core-i9-11900K-Shadow-of-the-Tomb-Raider.jpg

** Do Not Hotlink Images **
 
Last edited by a moderator:
haszek said:
Similar single to AMD but lower multi
https://videocardz.com/newz/intel-c...ample-compared-with-core-i9-10900k-at-5-2-ghz
Click to expand...
Why would anyone get one if you can get a 5800X that out performs it? Unless it's £200?

TNSTKDJ.png


Dm6N1pI.png
 
Grim5 said:
Ouch. So still behind AMD in IPC.

11900k CBR20 single core: 610 points
5950x CBR20 single core: 640 points (you can get 670-690 with some very tight curve optimizer tweaks)
Click to expand...
How long does CBR20 run for? Because if this at max turbo with the 11900k running at 5.3GHz vs 4.8GHz for the 5900X then Zen3 is 15% faster per GHz.
Official specs says only 125W like the 10900K but then we know the 125W is largely fiction.
 
KompuKare said:
How long does CBR20 run for? Because if this at max turbo with the 11900k running at 5.3GHz vs 4.8GHz for the 5900X then Zen3 is 15% faster per GHz.
Official specs says only 125W like the 10900K but then we know the 125W is largely fiction.
Click to expand...
5800X
51 seconds multi core - 6085 pts
8 minutes 15 singlce core - 643 pts

CPU Package power max - 118W
CPU Core Power max - 94.5W
CPU Core + SoC Power - 108W
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom