Associate
- Joined
- 12 Jul 2015
- Posts
- 1,694
Although stupid question time, has it been confirmed that these initial coffeelake CPUs will be unlocked and overclockable?
Yes, the whole point of the initial release is 95W K parts.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Although stupid question time, has it been confirmed that these initial coffeelake CPUs will be unlocked and overclockable?
Yes, the whole point of the initial release is 95W K parts.
basically yeah, although I guess no one knows how it's going to play out as tick-tock is dead so new processes aren't coming as fast.
broadwell fitted z97 iirc, so maybe this new v2 socket will be coffeelake + icelake (or whatever 10nm first cpu is)
maybe z270 boards won't be capable of another 2 cores being pushed hard?
**** knows tbh, need more info to be released.
I'm hoping he will give some more clarification on this too.
Although stupid question time, has it been confirmed that these initial coffeelake CPUs will be unlocked and overclockable?
Yes but that was in the days of tick-tock. Now we have architecture-optimisation-process, which Intel isn't even sticking to because Coffee Lake is a second "optimisation" step, like Kaby Lake was. To have a whole new socket for an optimisation step and sticking with 2 generations per socket is ridiculous since it means there won't even be a new architecture on Z370 or whatever they call it!It's been a socket per generation for quite a while I thought.
Yes but that was in the days of tick-tock. Now we have architecture-optimisation-process, which Intel isn't even sticking to because Coffee Lake is a second "optimisation" step, like Kaby Lake was. To have a whole new socket for an optimisation step and sticking with 2 generations per socket is ridiculous since it means there won't even be a new architecture on Z370 or whatever they call it!
Not necessarily true. depends on how much it costs to develop a board when moving to a new chipset.It's pretty good if your in the business of selling motherboards though.
I take it they are releasing more than just the 6 core chips on coffee lake, as in the usual 2 and 4 core versions. If so then their is no real reason the 2 and 4 core chips will not be compatable through a bios update, leaving the 6 cores needing a new chipset due to possible power delivery issues.
True. You'd have to think that the reason they do so, is so that they can make some money though, surely they wouldn't bother if it wasn't in their interest to do so. Obviously though, that depends how many they would sell but those numbers would be less if people were sticking to the same board over multiple cpu changes.Not necessarily true. depends on how much it costs to develop a board when moving to a new chipset.
Does intel/AMD get royalties from MB sales? that would explain why intel would be keen to release new MB, each year.True. You'd have to think that the reason they do so, is so that they can make some money though, surely they wouldn't bother if it wasn't in their interest to do so. Obviously though, that depends how many they would sell but those numbers would be less if people were sticking to the same board over multiple cpu changes.
Does intel/AMD get royalties from MB sales? that would explain why intel would be keen to release new MB, each year.
Yep they do, according to this https://revenuesandprofits.com/how-intel-makes-money/id imagine they have to buy the chipset bits direct from amd and intel then add their own stuff to it. but not sure exactly as without motherboard makers neither cpu maker can sell a single cpu.
Not necessarily true. depends on how much it costs to develop a board when moving to
Yep they do, according to this https://revenuesandprofits.com/how-intel-makes-money/
Which would explain why they are always so keen.
I think for MB vendors, I'm not sure a 12 month lifecycle on there motherboards maximises profits for them, in comparison to research cost. Unless when new chipsets come out the simply pop the old ones out and plonk the new ones in.
Wait, there's going to be a quad core version of Coffee Lake-S? Seems odd considering it has no IPC increase, unless they've managed to push the clocks (and the power usage) up even more than with Kaby Lake? Other option is to actually make i7-7700K EOL and replace it with a cheaper i7-8700K, giving the hex core i7-8760K (or whatever it'll be called) a more comfortable price range to sit in between the i7-8700K and the i7-7800X.
Wait, there's going to be a quad core version of Coffee Lake-S? Seems odd considering it has no IPC increase, unless they've managed to push theclocks (and the power usage) up even more than with Kaby Lake? Other option is to actually make i7-7700K EOL and replace it with a cheaper i7-8700K, giving the hex core i7-8760K (or whatever it'll be called) a more comfortable price range to sit in between the i7-8700K and the i7-7800X.
Wait, there's going to be a quad core version of Coffee Lake-S? Seems odd considering it has no IPC increase, unless they've managed to push theclocks (and the power usage) up even more than with Kaby Lake? Other option is to actually make i7-7700K EOL and replace it with a cheaper i7-8700K, giving the hex core i7-8760K (or whatever it'll be called) a more comfortable price range to sit in between the i7-8700K and the i7-7800X.
possibly replacing i3s with 4/4 cpus?
Possible due to Kaby Lake Pentiums being 2c/4t but I still wouldn't bet on it.possibly replacing i3s with 4/4 cpus?