International football & World Cup Qualifiers 9th Sept **spoilers**

Please, 4 years since we last went to a major tournament, anybody thats goes off bookies odds is stupid, people always bet on thier home team so the odds are always low. On form England are probably the 4th best team in the World behind Spain Brazil and Holland.

Read my post before you come in all guns blazing:rolleyes:...i said making them 3rd faves to win the WC by the bookies is optimistic at best...for me the faves or the teams that could potentially win the WC are....Brazil, Spain, Holland, Germany, France and even Argentina, if they qualify...those are the teams id put well above England when it comes to betting on which team could win the WC.

England had a very easy qualifying group...it was **** easy for them...god only knows why the British media are hyping it up so much for England...they havent really been tested yet..well getting beat 2-0 to Spain in a friendly a while back was their most challenging game but thats neither here or there tbh.

Anyhow not aking anything away from England...they did very well to qualify the way they did...Capello is working wonders with the English team and for once id like to see the English football team do well but excuse me if i dont show my enthusiasm as some of you in here are doing...so far its been a pretty easy ride...lets see what Dec 4th has in store for England.
 
On form ?

I'd put Brazil, Spain, Holland, Italy, Germany, Argentina, France before England.

The're on better form than England? What games have you been watching.

Ignoring form, I'd say Brazil, Spain and Argentina are the only teams better than England were all the big hitters to reach the world cup finals.
 
The're on better form than England? What games have you been watching.

Ignoring form, I'd say Brazil, Spain and Argentina are the only teams better than England were all the big hitters to reach the world cup finals.

No, cheets was saying England on form are the fourth best.

I said, those teams on form are all better then England :)
 
Talking about the form now, France has lost 1 and drawn 3.

We also lost to a weaker france team than the one currently playing like poo. Frankly they still have a very good team, if Platini wasn't bumming Domenech then France would be major contenders for the World Cup, yes Domenech got them to a final, though that was "mostly" the team managing itself with a MASSIVE leader/playmaker in Zidane playing off previous training/management and tactics. In reality when Zidane was replaced the team needed heavy guidance with tactics and learning to play without maybe the best player in the world. Zidane was the player of that tournement, bar his headbutt he was outstanding.

As for the other teams listed, France, Italy and Holland as they are, have teams with major weakness in them, but its surprising how experience can drag a team like Italy through to a final and a win even though undeserved.

England haven't been close to tested, Croatia were nothing in that game, their midfield wasn't there, Olic was seemingly played completely unfit, he was huffing and puffing within minutes, looked sweaty and under the weather straight off and didn't put a foot right throughout, grimacing from injury or illness I don't know but he clearly wasn't there. Croatia last qualifying group were a much stronger and better team without injurys and Russia were a very strong side, obviously, we had quarter finalists in our qualification group and thats why we didn't qualify.

Our group this time doesn't have any teams that would make the knock out stages.

We've still only played France, Spain and the dutch under Capello, and we've looked woeful in those games and lost 2 and drawn 1, against the weakest of the 3. We've played other games with big results like last night before and after all those games, so last night tells us nothing.

The biggest issue for winning in the world cup is, Spain, even if they take several key injuries they will still be incredibly strong. Brazil don't have much strength in depth and play a bizarre system that isn't working great at the moment.

England need someone else to knock out Spain, no one to be smart and get a new manager for France, have Brazil knock out all the big guns and have a poor game in the final.
 
Then replace "on form" with "current form"

Brazil, Spain, Holland, Italy, Germany.

Could maybe argue Russia.

Why is a well performing German side better than an English side? Where do you get this analysis from? Player for player, they aren't better.
 
I must say, looking at the way the various qualifications are going, it looks like quite a few of the "bigger" teams arent going to make it to the world cup.

That certainly means that this world cup is likely to be the best chance we have had to win it for a long time.

Having said that...I dont go with the media hype. I still dont think we will win the world cup next year. Lets face it, before every single tournament we get this media hype that we are going to win, and then somewhere in the tournament our wheels fall off and the very nature of the tournament means that it only takes 1 match for that to happen and you're out.

My money is still on one of the "usual" teams to win the world cup again next year.
 
I must say, looking at the way the various qualifications are going, it looks like quite a few of the "bigger" teams arent going to make it to the world cup.

That certainly means that this world cup is likely to be the best chance we have had to win it for a long time.

Having said that...I dont go with the media hype. I still dont think we will win the world cup next year. Lets face it, before every single tournament we get this media hype that we are going to win, and then somewhere in the tournament our wheels fall off and the very nature of the tournament means that it only takes 1 match for that to happen and you're out.

My money is still on one of the "usual" teams to win the world cup again next year.

The media aren't saying we are going to win. Spain and Brazil are firm favourites.
 
Why is a well performing German side better than an English side? Where do you get this analysis from? Player for player, they aren't better.

I watch a lot of football, the German side isn't a "bad" side, they're playing very well and winning games. They currently stand higher in the Fifa rankings then England, and have a "better" history then England in world cup finals, winning the competition on three occasions, runners up on four occasions, and coming third on three occasions. Compared to Englands one world cup win.

International football, isn't always about having the best players, it's about working as a team and finding a system that works. While England have a few gifted footballers, they're not alone in that, many countries have gifted footballers, and many have better players then the England side.

Germany are a good side.
 
One of the biggest criticisms aimed against refereeing is that most of them don't understand the game because they haven't experienced playing.

Rooney could have easily stayed on his feet but the ball had been kicked somewhere near to the corner flag, he'd kicked it there because there was only ever one thing on his mind (and it wasn't scoring).

To me that's a dive.

I see we're still on this.
 
I watch a lot of football, the German side isn't a "bad" side, they're playing very well and winning games. They currently stand higher in the Fifa rankings then England, and have a "better" history then England in world cup finals, winning the competition on three occasions, runners up on four occasions, and coming third on three occasions. Compared to Englands one world cup win.

International football, isn't always about having the best players, it's about working as a team and finding a system that works. While England have a few gifted footballers, they're not alone in that, many countries have gifted footballers, and many have better players then the England side.

Germany are a good side.

History means nothing. It's like tossing coin, it comes up heads 3 times our of 3, doesn't make it any more likely to be heads the 4th time.

The only thing that matters is how the current team will cope in the world cup. Their current form is not better than Englands. I don't see evidence of them playing better together than the current England side.

They drew to China earlier in the year, lost to Norway. Last year lost to England and drew against Finland. On this basis, I'd say England have a team which is "working" better.

The only thing going for them is the experience the current side might have after getting to the finals in euro 08.
 
History means nothing. It's like tossing coin, it comes up heads 3 times our of 3, doesn't make it any more likely to be heads the 4th time.

The only thing that matters is how the current team will cope in the world cup. Their current form is not better than Englands. I don't see evidence of them playing better together than the current England side.

They drew to China earlier in the year, lost to Norway. Last year lost to England and drew against Finland. On this basis, I'd say England have a team which is "working" better.

The only thing going for them is the experience the current side might have after getting to the finals in euro 08.

History counts for a lot in Football, England fans often still talk about the '66 world cup final. A lot of teams play on their success. Manchester United are a team that do it very well, flowers of Manchester anyone ?

The current team, (Germany) are ahead of England in the Fifa world rankings.

England have had their ups and downs, all international sides do. Germany are playing well, and looking quite good at the moment.
 
History counts for a lot in Football, England fans often still talk about the '66 world cup final. A lot of teams play on their success. Manchester United are a team that do it very well, flowers of Manchester anyone ?

Why? What does Uruguay being twice world cup winners do for the current Uruguay side?

Germany are ahead of England in world rankings because of their performances in past tournaments. How relevant are those performances to the world cup in 2010? Apart from euro 08 perhaps, not much.
 
Back
Top Bottom