ISIL, ISIS, Daesh discussion thread.

Chemical attacks have been false flagged before. There are many staged videos on it on YouTube.

It is quite worrying the drum for war which has been attempted before.

Why would Assad who has nearly won the war randomly use chemical gas on civilians. It does not make sense.

C8sFRXJVwAEqlMm.jpg

LOL

http://www.snopes.com/cnn-same-refugee-girl/

You do believe any old **** you read don't you.....they are the same girl, from the same bombing, just being carried by different people at different times

Dis86 said:
People aren't fixed to one place you know. They move. Especially when fleeing war.

It's just weak minded people that believe all this crap, unfortunately there seem to be a lot of them and social media has made the rest of us have to endure their rubbish
 
LOL

http://www.snopes.com/cnn-same-refugee-girl/

You do believe any old **** you read don't you.....they are the same girl, from the same bombing, just being carried by different people at different times



It's just weak minded people that believe all this crap, unfortunately there seem to be a lot of them and social media has made the rest of us have to endure their rubbish


You still believe snopes after he\she has been caught out time and time again. He has a leftist agenda

http://silenceisconsent.net/snopes-caught-lying-hillary-loses-credibility/
It's just weak minded people that believe all this crap, unfortunately there seem to be a lot of them and social media has made the rest of us have to endure their rubbish ;)
 
You still believe snopes after he\she has been caught out time and time again. He has a leftist agenda

*yawn* Not sure what a 'leftist agenda' has to do with disproving ***** memes used to fool idiots

Have a look at the full pictures and explanation or do you still believe the girl was used in a false flag crisis conspiracy theory? :D:D:D

But then again you probably do, since you have proved time and time again your level of non-critical thinking :p
 
You still believe snopes after he\she has been caught out time and time again. He has a leftist agenda

http://silenceisconsent.net/snopes-caught-lying-hillary-loses-credibility/
It's just weak minded people that believe all this crap, unfortunately there seem to be a lot of them and social media has made the rest of us have to endure their rubbish ;)

Wow, you've actually used a site that has a massive eagle in it's banner claiming 'SNOPES IS A LIBERAL', like some sort of MacArthuresc accusation, as evidence that the pic with the girl is made up?! Despite the evidence to the contrary!

All the more sad that those are pics from the aftermath of a bombing at a funeral.
 
Chemical attacks have been false flagged before. There are many staged videos on it on YouTube.

It is quite worrying the drum for war which has been attempted before.

Why would Assad who has nearly won the war randomly use chemical gas on civilians. It does not make sense.

C8sFRXJVwAEqlMm.jpg


lawl

Some people are soooo gullible, hey guys I've got some magic beans for sale!

Also you seem to be very ignorant on how rescue teams operate at disaster zones like this:rolleyes:

It's also disgusting and shameful that you accuse these brave heroes of being fake and part of some sort of crazy tin-foil hat conspiracy :mad:
These selfless individuals risk their lives to save people! When was the last time you risked your life to save a complete stranger :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
*yawn* Not sure what a 'leftist agenda' has to do with disproving ***** memes used to fool idiots

Have a look at the full pictures and explanation or do you still believe the girl was used in a false flag crisis conspiracy theory? :D:D:D

But then again you probably do, since you have proved time and time again your level of non-critical thinking :p


Lets look at the person(snopes) you lefties love so much and will defend him.
"When Snopes was founded by spouses Barbara and David Mikkelson, they used a letterhead claiming they were a non-existent society to give credibility to their research"
"The couple is divorced, and Barbara claimed in legal documents that David embezzled $98,000 of company money to spend on “himself and prostitutes"

"Now operating Snopes himself, David Mikkelson’s new wife Elyssa Young is employed by the website as “an administrator.” Before that, she worked as an escort and porn actress."

"Kim LaCapria, one of the site’s main researchers and the author of the baised and misleading “fact-check” on Hillary Clinton’s representation of a child rapist, previously had a blog called “ViceVixen"

https://ethicsalarms.com/2016/12/22/ethics-quiz-the-truth-about-snopes/ You and snopes deserve each other :)
 
Lets look at the person(snopes) you lefties love so much and will defend him.
"When Snopes was founded by spouses Barbara and David Mikkelson, they used a letterhead claiming they were a non-existent society to give credibility to their research"
"The couple is divorced, and Barbara claimed in legal documents that David embezzled $98,000 of company money to spend on “himself and prostitutes"

"Now operating Snopes himself, David Mikkelson’s new wife Elyssa Young is employed by the website as “an administrator.” Before that, she worked as an escort and porn actress."

"Kim LaCapria, one of the site’s main researchers and the author of the baised and misleading “fact-check” on Hillary Clinton’s representation of a child rapist, previously had a blog called “ViceVixen"

None of this is relevant to this thread or anything being discussed.

Character assassination of a webmaster doesn't change any facts listed on the site just because those facts are reported by said website (among others).

If the person in question was providing a professional opinion then your rant may bring it into question, but as they are just relaying information that's freely available and easily verifiable it's inconsequential.
 
So basically your source is the 'Daily Mail'

lawl

(You realise Wikipedia has banned them for being shockingly inaccurate :rolleyes: )

No wonder you come across as ignorant as you do if that's the quality of information you are absorbing !!
 
lawl

Some people are soooo gullible, hey guys I've got some magic beans for sale!

Also you seem to be very ignorant on how rescue teams operate at disaster zones like this:rolleyes:

It's also disgusting and shameful that you accuse these brave heroes of being fake and part of some sort of crazy tin-foil hat conspiracy :mad:
These selfless individuals risk their lives to save people! When was the last time you risked your life to save a complete stranger :rolleyes:

There's a difference between "This is ******* fake" and "I have some doubt that this is real", the fact that you're conflating them together is the reason why discussion can never really occur, because you're seemingly so dogmatic that only one side is pure good and the other pure evil.

You're pushing people from a position of doubt which is logical, to a position of "**** you, i'll believe exactly the opposite from you now" which is a disaster.
 
You're pushing people from a position of doubt which is logical, to a position of "**** you, i'll believe exactly the opposite from you now" which is a disaster.
The person he was responding too is already ingrained deeply in a position of "I will zealously believe anything that doesn't come from a mainstream/official source".
 
I keep hearing this "Russian-liars" statement over the past few days.

Watching this
I wish our leaders would talk as openly.

So funny and smart IMO how he reprimands the reporter early on in her grammar.
 
What's funnier (but not nearly as smart) is the amount of fanboyism in this thread :D all world leaders have an agenda. They all conspire to meet that agenda.
 
What's funnier (but not nearly as smart) is the amount of fanboyism in this thread :D all world leaders have an agenda. They all conspire to meet that agenda.
It's hilarious. I reckon some of these chaps have duvet covers with Vladimir riding half naked on a bear on them.
 
What's funnier (but not nearly as smart) is the amount of fanboyism in this thread :D all world leaders have an agenda. They all conspire to meet that agenda.



Conspire - (Oxford English Definition.) "to secretly plan with other people to do something illegal or harmful"
"to seem to work together to make something bad happen"

Agenda is a good word too. (the intention behind what somebody says or does, that is often secret.)

You make your bed as they say.

Your country needs you.
 
TILLERSON: "We are considering an appropriate response which violates all previous U.N. resolutions, violates international norms and long-held agreements between parties including the Syrian regime, the Russian government and all other members of the U.N. Security Council. It’s a serious matter. It requires a serious response."

Well that quote is slightly terrifying, surely you don't make a statement like that unless you mean it.
 
The US have just fired 50 cruise missiles against airfields in Syria in retaliation for the gas attacks.
 
Back
Top Bottom