The Lotus Elise and Exige are brilliant cars. I love them and prefer them to the heavier (more expensive) super sports cars. They also offer fantastic value for money.
I was simply saying that I thought he probably deserved a penalty for being a dozy pillock on Sunday
Renault's options in case Kubica cannot return are limited, as the outfit wants a clear number one driver to base its future ambitions around.
Rubens Barrichello is the only current race-winning driver that is available for next year, although he is coming towards the end of his career so would not be a long-term solution for Renault.
The outfit could take a gamble on a young driver, however – like Bruno Senna or its third driver Romain Grosjean, or try and secure a talented youngster like Paul di Resta and Nico Hulkenberg who do not yet have firm deals at Force India for 2012.
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/95270
Fingers crossed Kubica does make a return at some point.
Di Resta would be their best option if they did change, but get the feeling next year they will have the same drivers as this.
I don't know why this is suddenly a controversial issue since Lewis mentioned it on sunday. It's been well known for a long time that the mirrors are not very good, and many drivers have made this comment before. Considering that Hamilton had already been absolved by the stewards and therefore needed no excuses, why aren't we just taking this at face value?