Japan's 'hottest pin-up' only 12 yrs old.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Et2 said:
In 624 Abu Bakr (Muhammad’s daily companion and one of his first believers and successor of Muhammad) gave Muhammad his daughter Aisha when she was six years old, although the actual marriage was not consummated until she was nine. This fact is uncontested by all Muslim scholars and chroniclers without exception). At the time of their marriage Muhammad was 54 years old (the age of her grandfather) – a difference of 45 years in their ages.

Aisha herself testified to these facts:

“The messenger of God betrothed me when I was six years old and then married me when I was nine years old.”
And that was the justification for why after the revolution Ayatollah Khomeini dropped the age of marriage in Iran to 9. (Sex is illegal outside marriage) It was raised to 13 for females in 2002 who married without parental consent. Under 13's require parental consent plus the approval of a "Righteous Court."
 
Last edited:
heh i always thought we were pretty liberal in england but now i see that we're a bunch of prudes compared to the nips...

used panties from vending machines... lmao... what ever will they think of next..
 
The fact that she has boobs kind of removes the paedophilic element from the equation, but it does remain that she is only 12 years old and as such is socially and sexually naive and should probably not be put into positions where she has men multiples of her age drooling over her.
 
dunno if this has been posted (and tbh I'm quite sure this topic should be in SC anyway as it was intended for debate)

wiki said:
Sweet Kiss is a Japanese pop band made up of Saaya Irie, Runa, and Jessica. They have not debuted as a musical act yet, only releasing "idol" DVDs.

They formally announced their breakup on May 12, 2006.
so, formed, relesed "idol" DVDs, split up in May.
what they doing now? where they 12 when they started or 12 when it ended?
 
Kroegen said:
Edit: Joking aside, i think its child pornography :mad:

So if a 25 year old woman wears a bikini in a photo, thats pornography too? A bikini is not pornographic imo.

Edit: what Sequoia said above is my viewpoint too, but he said it better than I can. :p
 
Last edited:
GlasgowTitan said:
So if a 25 year old woman wears a bikini in a photo, thats pornography too? A bikini is not pornographic imo.

Edit: what Sequoia said above is my viewpoint too, but he said it better than I can. :p

Sexually Provocative pictures of 12 year old girls is porno imo. You cant goto swimming pools and video record children can you?
 
Kroegen said:
Sexually Provocative pictures of 12 year old girls is porno imo. You cant goto swimming pools and video record children can you?

If you had their consent/parents consent you could. I mena, i hane lots of photos of beaches from the south of france etc. Theres bound to be the odd topless person in there somewhere- is that pornography? There are porbably also lots of children in the background, maybe some young girls wearing bikinis. Heck, I have a picture that has my girlfriend in the bottom left corner, you can just make out her breasts- is that porn? no!


The behaviour may seem strange and we have the right to be concerned but we must remember that this is not straightforward pornography or pedophilia, it is a cultural difference.

As has been mentioned before, in the US the age of consent is 18. Does this make us all pedos? In some counbtires you mustn't have sex until you are married (syria I believe for one). Are we 'sickos' for having sex outside marriage? In many countires the age of consent is 13, are we just old fashioned?


PS; any spelling or gramatical errors are the result of wine and not me. :D
 
and for all those on their high horse, lets compare young teenage pregnancies in the UK and in Japan.

Id bet money that way more young british girls are being humped by older guys than young japanese girls.
 
siandtina said:
So its ok for me to sleep with a girl age 15 in Spain, but i'd get put in prison in UK. You can't apply British views worldwide, it doesn't fit! Its like making a jigsaw with one piece. You have to accept that others have different views.

I can apply them world wide cos i am BRITISH!

Do you accept that all westerners are infidels and are should be targeted and murdered because some loony cleric reads it like that ?

Do i accpet stoning people to death because they are unfaithful to their husbands.

We are way behind on the rest of europe on the age of concent, lowering that and giving it 5 years eduaction may help us out on the teenage pregnancy front.
 
Efour2 said:
I can apply them world wide cos i am BRITISH!

Do you accept that all westerners are infidels and are should be targeted and murdered because some loony cleric reads it like that ?

Do i accpet stoning people to death because they are unfaithful to their husbands.
.

I think you just proved his point there mate..

Hes saying that a subjective view cannot be applied to everyone...Therefore the loony clerics view shouldnt be applied to everyone...Just as our views shouldnt.
 
Balddog said:
a lot of it isnt sexual...regardless of what your own mind might read into it.

But it's still wrong.

Looking at pictures of 12 year old girls in underwear.

My step-sister is 13 years old. I just couldn't imagine it.

(Sorry, I skipped the last 4 pages of the thread)

edit... I just Googled...

Yeah, sure she's got a nice rack, but you can so tell she's 12 years old.

Anyone who says otherwise is either blind or just stupid :p
 
Last edited:
To be honest, I don't see much of a problem, they're just doing modelling, true, a some of the pics may be a bit questionable for the UK, but as has been said, Japan is a totally different culture to ours, and I'll agree with that argument, we can't just go about judging them on it really.

Balddog said:
a....
Id bet money that way more young british girls are being humped by older guys than young japanese girls.

Sorry, but that sentence made me giggle, I know exactly what you're saying, but I read it a little differently :o
 
Sequoia said:
[...] if it's an arbitrary limit, why is it legal and acceptable one side of it, and a serious criminal offence the other side, even if only separated by days, or minutes?
Because it is an arbitrary limit. :p

It therefore has a limited (if any) basis in principle. It is, however, a line that has been drawn and one that (presuming our political process acts with reasonable efficiency – oh ho ho) the bulk of society find agreeable.

That isn’t to detract from the rest of your (quite reasonable) post – that line just amused me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom