Oxbow said:
Is this not Chid Porn in a disguised form?
Is it?
What makes an image pornographic? Is it the image content, or the intent of the image creator?
If you've got a photo of a 12-year old in a school uniform, is it porn? What if it's my daughter, or grand-daughter? What about the same image but in a swimming costume?
What is a "child"? Does a photo that is unacceptable if the "child" is aged 15 years, 364 days, 23 hours and 50 minutes suddenly become acceptable 10 minutes later? Or if taken 10 minutes later?
Is there a difference between a picture of a girl in a school uniform where she is 15, and one where she isn't, but looks as if she is?
Why 16? Why not 15, or 17, or 15.5? Is there a reason, or is it just an arbitrary limit? I'd suggest the latter. And if it's an arbitrary limit, why is it legal and acceptable one side of it, and a serious criminal offence the other side, even if only separated by days, or minutes?
Is "pornography" not in the eyes of the beholder .... or the intent of the image creator? After all, one person may see a picture of a schoolgirl in uniform and think "Ahhh.... what a sweet child" and another may think "Phwoar..." etc.
I mean, there has to be a limit. But if it's possible for girls over 16 to dress up and look much younger, it is certainly possible for younger girls to dress up and look much older. Which one is porn?
On the other hand, there certainly comes a point where it's just sick. But, is that point actually a rational one, or a reflection of the cultural values of the society we are each raised in? I mean, if you have a society which sexualises everything, like ours does, then a picture of a child may be "pornographic", but if the intent of the creator and reaction of the viewer are not sexual, then all you have is a photo of a child.
Personally, I think we've done this to ourselves, and we've done it in recent years. It's the often-unwholesome influence of the media, and the advertising industry, if you ask me, because things were NOT like this in my childhood. A photo of a girl in school uniform was just a photo of a girl in a school uniform in those days. These days, I'd be VERY wary about pointing a camera at ANY child, without the careful and explicit permission of the parents, school uniform or not. What a sad reflection, condemnation even, of our society.