yay, theres that klinck strawman, only took a couple of posts
nothing wrong with checking out legal aged women, i know soy drenched 'men' find that distasteful though
Incel, alpha.. I dont think you know what these words mean. But please carry on being the number one source of misinformation on this forum whilst whining like a little bitch about musk and twitter being all about misinformationHow is it a strawman? Your own words. Hey you wanna perv on women where you shouldn't you carry on. Guess you think it makes you an alpha right
If Trump was the guy you say he was, wouldn't he have made it his business to be close friends with Epstein, given he clearly knows he's into young girls? Rather than doing that, he kicked him out of Mar-a-Lago and was never close to him. It's almost as if Trump likes beautiful women are also not minors, it's almost as if he's into women around the age of 25 like he literally states in an interview linked on this thread. I also like beautiful women around age 25, I think that's fairly normal for most men, no?
Incel, alpha.. I dont think you know what these words mean. But please carry on being the number one source of misinformation on this forum whilst whining like a little bitch about musk and twitter being all about misinformation
nothing wrong with checking out legal aged women, i know soy drenched 'men' find that distasteful though
And just because it fell under the umbrella doesn't mean he had to attend and look at 15 year old girls. Personally I'd give that a massive pass.
Yes it is a strawman, you've equated 'perving' with 'checking out' they are 2 entirely different things. You've also decided to conflate legal age women with children, another one.LOL oh I think we both know what they mean. I'm not the one defending walking into women's changing rooms to letch at them, in fact you said
Rattled? No, that would be someone that claims to call out diving when his team does it then has to backtrack massively when a quick forum search shows that be highly disingenuous at bestand the "soy" comment is just sounds like you're going a little defensive now though, I particularly like the insult, you sound rattled.
I saw it and I'm still waiting for some actual evidence not some woman that decided to go public a few weeks before an election, not to mention there's been numerous women that were contestants at the time state its rubbish.Oh and I made an edit to that post before I saw the reply.
Mostly based on the book and (original British) tv series by Dobbs and (originally) centred around Thatcher's Conservatives.
Edit - Original series is worth a watch though.
Roar : "Clinton must be guilty, he's had loads of accusations against him"
Roar : "Andrew Tate must be innocent, he's only had accusations against him"
Nah just runs a sex exploitation business out of a notoriously corrupt country, nothing suspicious there.Yeah but Tate didn't travel to kiddie fiddle island.
As said, apparently Epstein tried to come on to an underage daughter of Trump's business friend. That's when he ****-canned Epstein's ass out of all his properties and stopped being his friend. Something Colonel_Klinck doesn't seem to understand or is being deliberately thick about. Is that you can have a friend with a dark secret and only later on you realise who they really are.I think something happened, between him and Trump. For all we know Trump found out about something and stop speaking to him at some point after 2000 but who really knows.
Nah just runs a sex exploitation business out of a notoriously corrupt country, nothing suspicious there.
Yeah but Tate didn't travel to kiddie fiddle island.
That is completely false. Flight logs show that Clinton flew on Epstein's plane a couple of dozen times—typically in the company of other public figures, to destinations such as Paris, Bangkok, Brunei and a few places in Africa—but never went to the island.
To me it absolutely does equal. To believe anything else makes a mockery of our "innocent until proven guilty" stance in this country. You are innocent until found guilty, if you're found Not guilty then your innocent status doesn't change one iota. To think otherwise is the whole smoke without fire premise which means we might as well throw all suspected people into jail just because they're suspected.
It's a slippery slope into an Orwellian society
Unless of course it's people you don't like, such as Russell Brand or Bill Clinton then you are perfectly happy with guilt upon accusation.
Yeah but Tate didn't travel to kiddie fiddle island.
Trump took at least seven trips on a private plane between 1993 and 1997, sometimes with members of his family.
Then-real estate developer Trump and Epstein were known associates at the time and were regularly seen together at formal events.
The logs, however, do not indicate that Trump or Clinton ever visited Epstein’s island in the Caribbean, the centre of his international sex-trafficking ring.
The Democrat was an even more frequent flyer, taking at least nine trips on the jet to places including Paris, Bangkok and Brunei.
He was close friends with him for years. He told us he was with the "I've known him for 15 years..." Rumours are Epstein cracked on to a young girl, maybe even Ivanka and Trump flipped and banned him. Only Trump gets to crack on to Ivanka.
You are amazing with your constant defence of someone who has been accused numerous times of sexual assault for rape for decades. He even told us what he did in that recording, "I just grab them by the ******". If I remember correctly your defence of him was, they are either lying or if its true they were asking for it by putting themselves in that position.
Yes it is a strawman, you've equated 'perving' with 'checking out' they are 2 entirely different things. You've also decided to conflate legal age women with children, another one.