Kyle Rittenhouse - teen who shot three people in Kenosha

did you realise the comment about carrying a weapon over state lines before the sneaky edit make you look more foolish than normal?

No what it looks like is I wrote it then checked it so deleted it.

As I said I dont really care about him getting off with stuff it does nothing for me either way yet it seems to validate most of your views.
 
Last edited:
No what it looks like is I wrote it then checked it so deleted it.

As I said I dont really care about him getting off with stuff it does nothing for me either way yet it seems to validate most of your views.
I'm happy to see justice served no matter what, unlike you and your ilk who still claim 'he got away with stuff'. Not guilty babycakes :D
 
Here, which includes multiple examples including quotes from the Insurance Journal and the New York times, now the question is do you have anything worthwhile to add to the conversation or just more nonsense posting?
That's quite contradictory to the majority of articles out there from a quick google, although your article does quote some as being "underinsured" which I guess is the policy owners fault - it doesn't specify but I'd assume they'd also be underinsured for similar damage caused by say a fire.

Well yes, that's what it is for ergo having your business burn down is still a big loss and something the business owner wanted to prevent.
Understood. What would the sensible option be then? Wait for high noon?
 
Last edited:
Not guilty. Keep taking your copium.

Tony doesn't care about facts.

Do you lot have a discussion group going so you can plan set attacks or something? For a start the post you quoted I change so I have no idea how you saw it some 12 hours later. But anyway Can you not read properly?

No what it looks like is I wrote it then checked it so deleted it.

As I said I dont really care about him getting off with stuff it does nothing for me either way yet it seems to validate most of your views.

That is the complete opposite of what you post. It is you dear boy that needs that copium.
 
Last edited:
Do you lot have a discussion group going so you can plan set attacks or something? For a start the post you quoted I change so I have no idea how you saw it some 12 hours later. But anyway Can you not read properly?



That is the complete opposite of what you post. It is you dear boy that needs that copium.

Normal people check the facts before they post. A lesson you could do with learning. What you post however is what you want the facts to be. Not reality. Unfortunately you live in some bizarre alternative world.
 
Normal people check the facts before they post. A lesson you could do with learning. What you post however is what you want the facts to be. Not reality. Unfortunately you live in some bizarre alternative world.

lol. You normal. Oh dear.

As I said it is clear he got off on technicalities but its done. You all know it and everyone else knows it.
 
Last edited:
lol. You normal. Oh dear.

As I said it is clear he got off on technicalities but its done. You all know it and everyone else knows it.

And yet you don't know it. It's irrelevant whether they were technicalities or not. He was found not guilty in a legal court.

Cope more.
 
lol. You normal. Oh dear.

As I said it is clear he got off on technicalities but its done. You all know it and everyone else knows it.

Posting long since and repeatedly debunked stuff and/ or just general nonsence is just par for the course for you isn't it Tony?

Only you are not in SC now and so you won't have the ususal gang of clapping seals to back you up when you talk a right load of twaddle just because you all agree on the same talking points.

It's always the same nonsence isn't it.... "he was 17" and "muh state lines" as if we are supposed to believe you would have been OK with Rittenhouse shooting a woman beater, a paedophile and a convicted felon (in what was from the outset and obvious case of self defence) if only he had come from the same state, rather than the same wider urban area, that crosses two states, and if he had been a year older.

A video game such as this may be in bad taste but it's not nearly as bad as venerating a violent repeat felon drug addict, supporting a degenerate Marxist movement (whose rise to prominence corresponds to the stats going in the opposite way to way their name suggests should be the focus) and repeating long since debunked fake news
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom