whataboutery
/ˌwɒtəˈbaʊtəri/
noun
BRITISH
noun: whataboutery; plural noun: whatabouteries
- the technique or practice of responding to an accusation or difficult question by making a counter-accusation or raising a different issue.
"all too often, well-intentioned debate descends into whataboutery"
"Why are you assuming that everyone knew he was "fleeing/running away"? What if he was getting to a better vantage point? Did Kyle tell them he was surrendering and going to the police? Did he holed his arms up whilst moving away to try and indicate he was of no threat."
Yet again I'm left wondering if you've watched any of the videos...
You see once again, what you see on a video is ENTIRELY different to what someone might be thinking someone is doing in the heat of the moment in a highly stressful situation such as this.
"Yeh well the video shows him walking in that direction". So what. That isn't what i'm talking about.
Yeah, it's not sure what you're talking about - some fantasy/whataboutery re: running to a "vantage point" in the middle of a road?
Ive never said he was running to a vantage point. I'm talking about what people at that time may have thought he may be doing, in the panic of the moment. How do they know he isn't just moving away to potentially get more shots off at people but from a better distance to protect himself?
If you are not interested in discussing what everyone was possibly thinking at the time and their intentions, then that is fine. But that is pretty much the curx of this whole case.
no, not at all *sigh*.
Ive never said he was running to a vantage point. I'm talking about what people at that time may have thought he may be doing, in the panic of the moment. How do they know he isn't just moving away to potentially get more shots off at people but from a better distance to protect himself?
If you are not interested in discussing what everyone was possibly thinking at the time and their intentions, then that is fine. But that is pretty much the curx of this whole case.
Of course, he's trying to get a better distance to protect himself, he's fleeing from them!
Just Lol at the defense right now re the ipad AI thing.
And doing just as poor of a job at arguing that point.FYI, the prosecutor right now is covering most of what i have been saying
That may have been the case, but , as i keep saying, others there were not to know that. Merely him moving in a certain direction does not indicate his ultimate intention.
Suppose, for the sake of argument, someone in that mob did believe he was fleeing to some vantage point or something then what?
someone coming across him without knowing the full context but hearing a commotion and gunshots aren't that likely to think he is an active shooter. https://youtu.be/VpTW2AJE9MQ?t=1144
If in an "intense" situation a person is considering that somone with a firearm is moving to a vantage point they probably know what good trigger discipline looks like.People will have all kinds of different impressions of what is going on - but he was moving away with the gun down in a neutral position, finger off the trigger (though someone unfamiliar with firearms and the situation might not notice that detail) and trying to avoid people - someone coming across him without knowing the full context but hearing a commotion and gunshots aren't that likely to think he is an active shooter. https://youtu.be/VpTW2AJE9MQ?t=1144
EDIT: That isn't to say it precludes people thinking he is a threat - but it is far from the way some are painting it either.
OK, but you're not clarifying what your point is still?
And doing just as poor of a job at arguing that point.
My point that those after him might have been intending to disarm him because they perceived him to be someone going around shooting people.
I'm not saying that they were correct in that assumption. But there was obviously massive confusion and panic going on so i'm trying to imagine what people's intentions were.
And doing just as poor of a job at arguing that point.