Kyle Rittenhouse - teen who shot three people in Kenosha

Again. Getting things wrong and calling names.
That's all your mob ever do...so 2019!
And you missed where I said
"In my opinion.
Any prosecutor that runs for a political office (like binder) should be fired."

Waiting for your none name calling come back.

Where did he call you a name?

You clearly are right wing. You voted for the BNP once!
 
Where did he call you a name?

You clearly are right wing. You voted for the BNP once!


And again the mob sticks together.
I am not right wing.

Yes I did vote bmp and 100,000s of others did as well to get the gov of the day to change it's direction.
Guess what. It worked. I and others said the same in that thread.

But you lot can't seam to understand how to get ones way in politics.

So another name calling post.
 
Last edited:
That's almost a whole country written out the rulebook then? :p

Good commentary from Pakman on this trial.


"Uncharged pickles?"

LMAO :D



Also on the Real America's voice thing -

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/real-americas-voice/

yeh....oh dear.

"RIGHT BIAS


These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.


  • Overall, we rate Real America’s Voice Right Biased and borderline questionable based on the promotion of misinformation regarding Coronavirus and election fraud by their hosts. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sources such as Just the News and a few failed fact checks."
 
Last edited:
It might help if you watched the video i quoted/mrk posted. :p
The David Pakman show? Again what's that got to do with real American voice?

Oh the witness that came off as a bit of a ********? And? Is that the 1st time you've seen his testimony?
 
Last edited:
The David Pakman show? Again what's that got to do with real American voice?

Watch the video and find out. What do you want? Do you want me to give a clear narration/transcript of what was said and covered in the video before being able to make a comment on it?

Are you equally bemused as to what "charged pickles" have to do with anything? That would seem the even stranger thing to bring up if you haven't watched the video!
 
Maybe I'm missing something but what's real American voice got to do with anything ?

<edit the below is wrong and confused between witness but the general point about proving bias by other means is still valid>

A witness who was present at the first shooting now works for them. He states that Rosenbaum said “**** you” and grabbed the gun.

the prosecution wanted to say affiliation with American Voice makes him biased. The judge wouldn’t allow this as it’s political. The judge however allowed other questions that gave the same results.

the point the prosecution where trying to make is that he is unreliable as a witness to the gun grabbing. However this clearly syncs up with the video and audio that included the “**** you” from Rosenbaum.

edit: sorry I have got my witness mixed up. The American Voice guy was recording the crowd not a witness to the shootings.
 
Last edited:
Watch the video and find out. What do you want? Do you want me to give a clear narration/transcript of what was said and covered in the video before being able to make a comment on it?

Are you equally bemused as to what "charged pickles" have to do with anything? That would seem the even stranger thing to bring up if you haven't watched the video!
I fail to see where his political bias comes into it if he is stating facts under oath?
 
A witness who was present at the first shooting now works for them. He states that Rosenbaum said “**** you” and grabbed the gun.

the prosecution wanted to say affiliation with American Voice makes him biased. The judge wouldn’t allow this as it’s political. The judge however allowed other questions that gave the same results.

the point the prosecution where trying to make is that he is unreliable as a witness to the gun grabbing. However this clearly syncs up with the video and audio that included the “**** you” from Rosenbaum.
Cheers, nice to see somebody reply without being a tit :)
 
Cheers, nice to see somebody reply without being a tit :)

you welcome, However I mixed the witness up. It’s still irrelevant the judge didn’t allow the line of political questions. The prosecution where allowed to prove there point by other means.

I got confused as most of the prosecution witness have kind of support the self defence argument. So it’s hard to remember who called who.
 
I fail to see where his political bias comes into it if he is stating facts under oath?

Well, you probably wouldn't a very good prosecutor then.

I imagine that he may have been trying to get on to it being a platform for lies and misinformation (which it is), to try and discredit/show bias in the witness.
 
<edit the below is wrong and confused between witness but the general point about proving bias by other means is still valid>

A witness who was present at the first shooting now works for them. He states that Rosenbaum said “**** you” and grabbed the gun.

the prosecution wanted to say affiliation with American Voice makes him biased. The judge wouldn’t allow this as it’s political. The judge however allowed other questions that gave the same results.

the point the prosecution where trying to make is that he is unreliable as a witness to the gun grabbing. However this clearly syncs up with the video and audio that included the “**** you” from Rosenbaum.

edit: sorry I have got my witness mixed up. The American Voice guy was recording the crowd not a witness to the shootings.


Thank you.

Watch the video and find out. What do you want? Do you want me to give a clear narration/transcript of what was said and covered in the video before being able to make a comment on it?

Are you equally bemused as to what "charged pickles" have to do with anything? That would seem the even stranger thing to bring up if you haven't watched the video!

crazyDAJT posted what you should have.
 
crazyDAJT posted what you should have.

I didn't have to post anything.

Are you implying that from now on, when quoting a video, posters must provide a detailed transcript for the video and explain in the post what the video said?
 
I didn't have to post anything.

Are you implying that from now on, when quoting a video, posters must provide a detailed transcript for the video and explain in the post what the video said?


You are a troll, seeking attention.
@dowie was right about you.
 
And again the mob sticks together.
I am not right wing.

Yes I did vote bmp and 100,000s of others did as well to get the gov of the day to change it's direction.
Guess what. It worked. I and others said the same in that thread.

But you lot can't seam to understand how to get ones way in politics.

So another name calling post.

Let me guess, the left wing trolls are making this a political thread now.
 
How was i being a tit? If you had watched the video i explicitly quoted, you would have known why i was posting about Real Americas voice.
It took over half of the video to get to the witness in question and your point about who he occasionally works for? I watched the 1st 3 minutes and the host was just bleating on about the judge and stopped the video.
 
Back
Top Bottom