I see a fair few comments about Fox's challenge of the Lockdown but we did recently have the Great Barrington Declaration from actual scientists in the field suggesting alternative methods of combatting the Covid Pandemic were possible. Largely around more targeted safeguarding. I also get the "it's just flu bro" arguments but given the people who die and require the longer term medical care are also the ones for whom targeted safeguarding would be necessary but's not completely ridiculous.
The problem being highlighted is that it is not acceptable to question to Lockdown orthodoxy, even if you have credentials to do so. Fox isn't an expert but he is highlighting the same questions being posed by genuine experts. The worry shouldn't be that people are questioning the approach, but instead the highly close minded and slightly authoritarian approach to dismiss the legitimacy of the questioning.
Genuine questions about the impact of people with other illnesses, like cancer, or the impact on the poor who seem disproportionally hit by the closure of business that provided their livelihood re swept away as the mob shrieks, "covidiots" and "conspiracy nuts".
