Legal aid should not fund asylum legal action.

The majority? Well us leaving the EU means we will be able to control the overall number of immigrants, from the EU and other countries, which im sure you will agree is a benefit to us as a country.


These stats are on a sound basis and I've never been a white supremacist you racist virtue signaller. I dint think I even mentioned colour.

If course I'm going to fact check you, the germans are pretty fastidious with record keeping.

Screenshot-20200824-130855-Chrome.jpg



How would you explain 12.8% of the population making up nearly 35% of all crime?


Jeez Mr Running man, be careful, they will be calling you a racist for pointing out facts next.....

Don't be daft, all these lovely people are here to enrich our culture, they are all like those hippies back from the 60's....they just want luv n peace maaaann
 
The majority? Well us leaving the EU means we will be able to control the overall number of immigrants, from the EU and other countries, which im sure you will agree is a benefit to us as a country.


These stats are on a sound basis and I've never been a white supremacist you racist virtue signaller. I dint think I even mentioned colour.

If course I'm going to fact check you, the germans are pretty fastidious with record keeping.

Screenshot-20200824-130855-Chrome.jpg



How would you explain 12.8% of the population making up nearly 35% of all crime?

And what countries were these foreigners from?

For all we know they could have been from the UK.
 
With a name like Mrwong

You would think that you had some compassion for foreigners. These people have went through hell to get here.

If this was 200 years ago and people were coming here nobody would have batted an eyelid.

Personally I'm of the opinion that anyone should be allowed to come here who has a fairly clean criminal record.

As in no rapists, murderers, etc the bad ones.

If someone has a minor record, quite small stuff then they should be properly interviewed and psych evaluated before any decision is made. Stopping them for petty stuff would be harsh when we already have plenty of hardened criminals here.

As for spending money on them. Do you know that the British Empire stole £45 trillion from India alone?

India had the third biggest economy in the world or 1/3rd total of the world's economy alone before the British empire destroyed it and stole all the wealth. And Britain only accounted for like 3% of the world's trade at the time.

Do you think that stolen money should be given back? After all Britain did massacre tens of millions of Indian lives in the process. As a result many millions more have no likley died from the knock on effects.


Actually the world became very stable during and after the British Empire. Countries borders became more established and stable after British rule.

Before the British Rule Indian did not have the land mass it had now.

India had always been invaded or has has invaded other countries. So please don't use the British Empire as the source of the problems, they are not. I would go as far as the Empire resolved and established a more stable world.

As I have said before the British Rule land borders were consistently changing almost yearly.

I'll answer your questions.

1) Are you continuing to use the British Empire as the source of all problems. If so then I blame the Romans and the Vikings and the cavevmen etc for the reason why the British became an offensive country after the many Invaders it had.

2) Indian history they took form other smaller countries in Asia before the empire. They too are not innocent.
3) the Indian economy was already in freefall before the British empire. The cast system was created by Indians.

4) the majority of the problems in India are due to the Indian governments, or other governments for their own native problems.

5) two hundred years ago they would have not let them in.

6) you seem to be happy to allow them in, if the government introduced tomorrow and said there will be an extra tax of 22% for immigration and asylum costs. This tax would be voluntary would you pay it?

7) If it continues social resources would be depleted and there would be nothing for anyone.

8) it is not the duty of this or any other governments to become the welfare state of the world.

9) once this count has managed to take care of it own population if there is anything left then I am happy to give it to those in other countries.
 
Last edited:
They often want to come to the UK because they speak english, not French, German or Italian.
 
Last edited:
These people have went through hell to get here.

Through choice, nobody forced them to travel through multiple safe countries and then cross the channel in a dingy.

Personally I'm of the opinion that anyone should be allowed to come here who has a fairly clean criminal record.

We have no idea who they are, no way of verifying anything they say so you cant just choose the 'good ones'.
 
Why don't you, you're the one presenting the facts.

Already presented them, if you want to dispute them go ahead.

Make your position clear and ensure that you provide numerous sources to back it up.


‐----
No country in the world has an open door policy to my knowledge.

We have a population of 65m, overcrowding, lack of affordable housing,. Due to covid, high unemployment.

Therefore it would be suicidal to invite unlimited immigration.
 
You do know the majority of those crimes are being committed mainly be Eastern Europeans who are free to travel here under eu rules?

Again it's just ignorant racist rhetoric.

How long have you been a racist and white supremacist?

The problem with people shouting Racist etc...
They link immigration to every other races apart from the white race.

This is where the argument fails, when I speak of immigration and asylum I see it as non skin related.

Those that accuse others of racist views are infact racist them selves because they have become so brainwashed and have interlinked colour with immigration, they are racists for think it.

Immigration and asylum is not about colour to me it is tribal for me, and how it impacts this country systematic workings.
 
Pretty much most of it if not all of it. But it entirely depends on how tinted your spectacles are.

hmmm ok let break it down then ?

Anybody seen whats been happening in Dover over the last few months?
A comment no mention of race = not racist

Boats full of military aged men being escorted from France to the UK by the French navy. This soon stopped when it was brought to light and now they are not even being escored by the French navy....
This is a fact, most of the people on the boats are young males and some ships have been escorted by the french navy over the line, so how is this racist?

They are coming in at a rate of 500+ a day...…
This is wrong but hardly racist, works out to be in the 20's per day on average (over 5000 now for the yeat) for the year the but numbers have gone up significantly year on year

Oh and when they get here they are being put up in expensive hotels at the tax payers expense while they wait for a house, lmao, cant make this up.
This is also an fact, They are being put up in hotels with spending money, a few billion over the next few years has been set aside

Yes I'm angry, our forefathers fought and died to protect the English way of life, to ensure their kids and grandkids have a future, now its all been sold out from under them and is being given away to people who hate the west and want us dead.

This is where I think you are getting confused here, this is Xenophobia (which is still bad when unwarranted), He/she/xi fears people who hate him coming over, he/she/xi has'nt mention anything where they are racially superior

Im native English, I cant get council housing as fast as these 3rd world immigrants.

Getting council housing even when your on the streets is pretty impossible unless have depends and even then its still pretty hard. The 3rd world immigrant part, well this does happen, in my local area a detention centre where asylum seekers was closed, where did those people go ? Council/s put them up in private housing/council properties. So at best he's being xenophobic again from elements of facts/

WHITE PRIVILEGE
Random comment, as you kinda proved if you raised any concerns, you get called a ist or a phobe / white supremacist/ cis white male privilege etc. We live in a crazy world where Aliens and Predator is seen as racist these days

LOLOLOL

TLDR: couple of bits might be xenophobic but not racist.
 
The problem with people shouting Racist etc...
They link immigration to every other races apart from the white race.

This is where the argument fails, when I speak of immigration and asylum I see it as non skin related.

Those that accuse others of racist views are infact racist them selves because they have become so brainwashed and have interlinked colour with immigration, they are racists for think it.

Immigration and asylum is not about colour to me it is tribal for me, and how it impacts this country systematic workings.


Oof, the truth. Its burns

Screenshot-20200824-133735-Chrome.jpg


upload
 
Oof, the truth. Its burns

Screenshot-20200824-133735-Chrome.jpg


upload

Wiki defines it, I do not see a specific colour, because there is no colour.


Immigration is the international movement of people to a destination country of which they are not natives or where they do not possess citizenship in order to settle as permanent residents or naturalized citizens.

Those people have hijacked another word and linked it with race.
 
Actually the world became very stable during and after the British Empire. Countries borders became more established and stable after British rule.

Before the British Rule Indian did not have the land mass it had now.

India had always been invaded or has has invaded other countries. So please don't use the British Empire as the source of the problems, they are not. I would go as far as the Empire resolved and established a more stable world.

As I have said before the British Rule land borders were consistently changing almost yearly.

I'll answer your questions.

1) Are you continuing to use the British Empire as the source of all problems. If so then I blame the Romans and the Vikings and the cavevmen etc for the reason why the British became an offensive country after the many Invaders it had.

2) Indian history they took form other smaller countries in Asia before the empire. They too are not innocent.
3) the Indian economy was already in freefall before the British empire. The cast system was created by Indians.

4) the majority of the problems in India are due to the Indian governments, or other governments for their own native problems.

5) two hundred years ago they would have not let them in.

6) you seem to be happy to allow them in, if the government introduced tomorrow and said there will be an extra tax of 22% for immigration and asylum costs. This tax would be voluntary would you pay it?

7) If it continues social resources would be depleted and there would be nothing for anyone.

8) it is not the duty of this or any other governments to become the welfare state of the world.

9) once this count has managed to take care of it own population if there is anything left then I am happy to give it to those in other countries.

Very stable?

Are you high?

Is kashmir stable?

Is Pakistan stable?

Was the mass forced immigration where millions were killed stable?

Was the forced famine due to British taking all the food stable?

Again very tinted spectacles being worn here.
 
Likely been told its nice here and better.

Little do they know its full of racists with no compassion.

They have mobile phones and the internet, perhaps the generosity of our welfare system usurps any feelings of being unwanted to them? Perhaps many wish to do our country harm from within after years of oppression and plunder? Perhaps so many are already here they are beckoning their comrades to join them on the streets relatively paved with gold, to hell with what nasty people in the Daily Mail write about them?
 
Back
Top Bottom