Legal aid should not fund asylum legal action.

Physically blocking them with what? Our underfunded services can't man every inch of the strait.

This is the same logic that's trotted out about drug demand, if you just expend more on stopping it'll somehow work. Though to be fair it's a different problem than the simplicity of supply and demand, the result is much the same because the government doesn't actually care. Why solve a problem when you can just hang the carrot indefinitely?

The supposedly restrictive conservatives have been in power 27 out of the last 40 years, yet they're the solution?
 
Quite sad how yet again immigrants are being scapegoated, unchecked government incompetence costs you far more than any immigrant ever will.

dirtychinchilla said:
I'm happy for my taxes to contribute to legal aid for asylum seekers. If you'd seen half these **** these people had seen, I'm sure you'd be seeking more than legal aid.
Click to expand...

+1
 
It is the correct channel "The English Channel"

I'll be here all week, try the veal ladies and gentlemen!
 
The genetic record shows Australians have a multi-10 thousand year tradition of repelling unwanted self-nominated migrants.

Though that wont help mrwongs claim for legal aid.
 
Mrwong said:
Look at the amount of money spent solely on is staggering.

Personally, legal aid should not cover any asylum claims.

The money spent in this area should be diverted to access other areas of legal help for citizens of the country.

If charities complaint about funding maybe they should pay for the asylums legal bills.

Or the UN or other global institute should find it.

What are you views.
Click to expand...

Cannot argue with a single word of that. I agree entirely.
 
deuse said:
Read my last post and the law.
I did link it for you.

How many shall I put you down for?
Click to expand...

How many of the celebrities and well known politicians that stated they'd happily home some "refugees" actually did so? I am looking you, Ed Balls, for one.... Australia has the right idea, as does Hungary.
 
explicit4u said:
Quite sad how yet again immigrants are being scapegoated, unchecked government incompetence costs you far more than any immigrant ever will.



+1
Click to expand...
Blame the government for everything ? The Government can be blamed for lots if things, but not everything is the Governments fault.

How far or how much are you will to spend your money on everyone else apart from your own family?

You fix your house before you attempted fix other issues.
This country does not have the finances to help the world. But it can help or reduce it's own problems.
 
Genuine asylum seekers wouldn't pass through a dozen safe countries and a further dangerous stretch of water but it's definitely our own governments fault that people are risking their lives to get here, the rewards are just too great and risk of being denied asylum practically zero once you set foot on UK soil. I can see why France is annoyed having half of world bearing down on Calais because of us also, don't blame them at all for helping people cross safely.
 
Shame on all of you :mad:. Show some compassion, you don’t know what it’s like to have had to deal with travelling through Italy and France to get to the UK. :mad::mad::mad:
 
mmj_uk said:
Genuine asylum seekers wouldn't pass through a dozen safe countries and a further dangerous stretch of water but it's definitely our own governments fault that people are risking their lives to get here, the rewards are just too great and risk of being denied asylum practically zero once you set foot on UK soil. I can see why France is annoyed having half of world bearing down on Calais because of us also, don't blame them at all for helping people cross safely.
Click to expand...

That is one of many problems, but if you reduce any desire then people will stop coming.

This would be the best solution, but taking hard line approach sometimes is the most humanitarian approach.

The only solution is to refuse all cases, what really amazes me that those seeking asylum have no cultural connection to the UK and the cultural connection they have are with countries that refuse them with out question.
 
StriderX said:
Physically blocking them with what? Our underfunded services can't man every inch of the strait.

This is the same logic that's trotted out about drug demand, if you just expend more on stopping it'll somehow work. Though to be fair it's a different problem than the simplicity of supply and demand, the result is much the same because the government doesn't actually care. Why solve a problem when you can just hang the carrot indefinitely?

The supposedly restrictive conservatives have been in power 27 out of the last 40 years, yet they're the solution?
Click to expand...

Pretty sure we do have enough resources to block them. Its only a small area from calais to kent.

What other priority missions are the navy doing? Probably good practice for them to do some active duty rather than parading.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom