I really don’t think that price is going to translate to a real U.K. or US price. I’d predict £2500 max. Still super expensive for sure, but not $6500
but I don't always believe better hardware or specs equal a better product just depends on your usage, my ancient LED panel certainly had the advantage of smaller size, id say its SD scaling was better or maybe Oleds are revealing just how bad SD source flaws are, better during day time use and with multiple windows in the room. There will always be pros and cons to hardware, some people are still better suited to sticking to LED tech over OLED.
That is exactly why I want to compare it, so I can tell my LG CX OLED you are still the best
There is a guy over on Avforums and I felt gutted for him, he has spent all this time and money and wall mounted his previous LG CX oled and due to the Windows in his room its shining directly onto it making it pretty much unusable during the day, so he is returning it.
It's not really his fault though, an average customer spending 2K+ on a TV it's not like it has a sticky tag on it saying best used in dark rooms, he is probably thinking why would someone make something like this
I don’t think this is necessarily down to Asus. It might be an NVIDIA limitation as HDMI 2.1 would need a brand new Gsync module (which this screen uses). I’d expect the first HDMI 2.1 monitors to be adaptive sync models as opposed to native GsyncIt's a VERY odd decision. I don't know if that's baked into the spec already and can't be changed, but the upcoming Viewsonic ELITE XG320U has HDMI 2.1 (and overall a decent spec for the purported price), and the Philips 328M1R was delayed to allow for 2.1 inclusion. For a flagship halo product such as the PG32UQX to not include HDMI 2.1 strikes me as very bizarre and short sighted.
That is exactly why I want to compare it, so I can tell my LG CX OLED you are still the best
There is a guy over on Avforums and I felt gutted for him, he has spent all this time and money and wall mounted his precious LG CX oled and due to the Windows in his room its shining directly onto it making it pretty much unusable during the day, so he is returning it.
It's not really his fault though, an average customer spending 2K+ on a TV it's not like it has a sticky tag on it saying best used in dark rooms, he is probably thinking why would someone make something like this
is needed
OLEDs have always had a glossy screen, and when you take the LG, CX out of the box you can see it, the common senses is needed here not to place in near a window did he not think before he wall mounted it in the right area of the room! or even cover his windows in day time! what an idiot I bet he couldn't understand how to fix the reflection problem so now he is return it? he reminds me of the idiots that returns a mobile phone because they can't see it in the day time I have no sympathy for idiots
About a OLED
Bright or Dark, the ambiance in your room makes a huge difference to your TV’s performance. Your hard-earned money will go down the drain if the lightning of the room isn’t considered before purchase.
TV's don't need to display a sticky tag on it saying best used in dark rooms, just common senses is needed
lol Aorus your quick edit
my goodness that poor fella, probably taken a sledgehammer towards his screen or window by now
and I don't think he knows how to use a sledgehammer then again he might return it and say he pick it up and it hit his window but don't know why Lol
For work it comes in handy for viewing excel spreadsheets or workflow trees. Love it. Here it is split into 4 frames using power toys.