LG to Introduce 34-inch IPS 21:9 UltraWide (Model UM95) monitor

Try it and seem it's so cheap it's almost throwaway money :p

Also, what would you guys do if you were me about the other 34UM95 I have. I was fully intending on sending it back to the German retailer but given how things can pan out I imagine it will come back with the lower left corner fixed but bleed then showing in another corner. The bleed on the lower left is still as posted earlier, acceptable by most people's standards and with that in mind I guess i could just sell it at a lower cost, maybe throw in the calibrator with it as well?

I'll be putting it on MM if I do sell it so mods need not adjust their belt buckles :p
 
Suppose! :D

But I hate buying stuff to only end up not using the item! :p


After all the hassle you went through, I would sell it for a lower cost (probably around £600-650), at the end of the day, you will still be making a neat bit of profit from all of this (I think?)

As for the calibrator well.... I would happily take it ;)

But on a more serious note, bundle it with the monitor, will be another sell point.

edit:

just remembered about the built in hardware LUT so the display would already come calibrated by yourself?
 
Last edited:
Let's do some maths to see if I do indeed profit from all the faff the past few months have given me.

- Bought 34UM95 from Germany @ £830.
- Returned original 34UM95 to Germany @ £52, STILL waiting for the refund on this from LG UK.
-- Running total: £882.

- Bought 29EB93 for £315 to tide me over until my 34UM95 comes back from repair.
-- Running total: £1197.

- Received 34UM95 back then sold the 29EB93 for £260.
-- Running total: £937.

- Received free 34UM95 and calibrator.
- Proposed sell of other 34UM95 @ £650, assuming someone buys at asking price...
-- Running total: £287.

- Add the difference from selling the 29EB93 at £260 vs buying it at £315 (£55).
-- Running total: £342.

- Less the shipping cost assuming LG UK finally do refund this and I'm left with a total spend to date of £290.

So through all this saga that's how much money I'd have put out from my own pocket assuming I do sell the other UM95 at £650.

Unless I'm missing something? :o
 
I was also including your previous monitors which you sold :p

But either way, if it all works out in the end, getting a £830 monitor for £290 certainly isn't a bad result :D
 
Last edited:
Aye! It would also come pre-calibrated but if I bundle the calibrator with it then the buyer can do it themselves too I guess :p

Although I could sell the calibrator for £20~... Every penny helps?
 
Aye! It would also come pre-calibrated but if I bundle the calibrator with it then the buyer can do it themselves too I guess :p

Although I could sell the calibrator for £20~... Every penny helps?

Personally, if I bought the monitor with the calibrator (knowing that you have already calibrated it with the x1), I would probably never use the calibrator unless the settings got reset or something :p

If you do decide to sell it separately for that price........ ;)
 
I'll put the monitor only up in MM then! Didn't you say you already ordered the LG calibrator though?

Nah, was going to wait for nightmares thoughts on non calibrated monitor VS calibrated monitor as well :p But if you are selling it separately for that price... :)
 
Last edited:
My review of the LG 29UM65 monitor, just a brief review so nothing fancy :)

Below is a brief review of the LG 29UM65 ultrawide monitor, which comes in at about £280.

Unfortunately my first two units had extremely bad backlight bleed, mainly the bottom left corner and the second one also had a dead pixel in the central area. It seems like this is quite a common problem with these LG 21.9 ultra wide monitors as a number of users on various forums have reported the same issue as well as a few of the 34" model owners... This third one is a lot better but still not "perfect", however, under normal conditions, the bleed is not that noticeable.

My first monitor @ 20% brightness:

OxuSEOSl.jpg

Second monitor @ 20% brightness:

FwBuGhel.jpg

The photos make the bleed look worse than what it really was like. It was mainly the bottom left that was very noticeable even during daylight usage.

I contacted LG directly for the second one to see if they could repair it rather than me doing another RMA and getting an even worse one, however, their response was an absolute joke, essentially they told me to "only use the monitor during the day and with a low brightness", needless to say, I cut the guy off there and proceeded to sort a RMA out with the retailer.

I was determined to get a good one as there was nothing else on the market that interested me at all and I didn't fancy any of the other 29" monitors due to them having their own downfalls.

Packaging:

The box is relatively small considering the size of the monitor. The monitor and items are well protected.

KdlEShXh.jpg

Along with the monitor, we receive one HDMI cable (which shouldn't be used as it doesn't properly support the 21.9 aspect ratio, instead DVI-D or a display port cable should be used), audio cables and the power brick (which is pretty small, it is a bit longer than a credit/debit card with the width being smaller than a credit/debit card) + power cord.

Features:

- Screen size: 29"

- Panel Type: IPS

- Aspect Ratio: 21:9

- Resolution: 2560x1080

- Brightness: 300 cd/m2

- Contrast Ratio: 50000000:1

- Viewing Angle: 178/178

- Colour Depth: 16.7M (8-Bit)

- Pixel Pitch: 0.315 x 0.310 mm

- Colour Gamut: sRGB

- Surface Treatment: Hard Coating (3H), Anti-Glare

- Connectivity: 1x DVI-D, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort

- Dimensions (with stand) - 702.5 x 181 x 418.2
- Dimensions (without stand) - 702.5 x 63.8 x 328.2

- Warranty: 2 years

Aesthetics and Stand:

The monitor looks absolutely gorgeous overall, due to the bezel free edges at the top and sides (as in no plastic chassis sticking out), the front looks very sleek. My only complaints with the aesthetics are; the LG symbol AND "LG" writing at the front, only need to have the one there, not both... and the glossy plastic finish, I still don't know why manufacturers insist on using glossy plastic these days, it just looks cheap and is a finger print magnet, give me a matte finish any day of the week!

Jg5wikGh.jpg

PXdw03zh.jpg

Underneath the power LED, we have a directional joystick for controlling the OSD, which in my eyes is better than having 5+ buttons to use like you get with DELL monitors. The OSD menu is very nicely laid out and easy to use and best of all, there is an option to turn off the power LED.

wOqYKysh.jpg

The rear ports on the back face outward, which I much prefer to downward facing ports, I find it much easier to connect and disconnect cables. We also have VESA mounting holes.

VIOdIWmh.jpg

The stand is very basic, you only have angle adjustment and two height choices, with the max height still being too low (although it just about suits my desk layout). Dell still have the best stands out there.

Image quality:

Unfortunately, my camera will not do this screen any justice so you will just have to take my word!

GFTmFnOh.jpg

Out of the box, the screen looks well calibrated already, in fact, I haven't even messed around with the settings except for reducing the brightness as it looks great as it is. I think the right side of my monitor is a bit darker than the left side. A photo of a black screen @13% brightness, once again, the camera makes the bleed look worse than what it really is.

lpy6QF6h.jpg

The screen looks absolutely amazing, it is extremely bright, so much that I have the brightness set to 13% and my PC/monitor sits right beside a big velux window too.

The anti-glare coating seems really good, not too aggressive and not too light, definitely better than my Dell U2311H anti-glare coating.

I can't detect any banding either.

gxvlDcAh.jpg

As usual with good IPS panels, the viewing angles are great. IPS glow doesn't seem to be much of an issue with this monitor, certainly better than my Dell U2311H.

Also, the "warm up" time from when you first turn the monitor on is very short i.e. it is very bright within milliseconds, with my Dell U2311H, it would take a few minutes till the brightness was normal (although it was fairly old so that probably had an impact)

The area where this monitor really shines and the sole reason I bought it is because of films, the majority of films take the full screen up so no black bars that you get with 16.9/16.10 screens. Of course there are a number of films that aren't shot in the 21.9 aspect ratio i.e. Pacific Rim, however, with the right media player, you can zoom in, this works pretty well for most films and the quality, sharpness still looks great. Most TV shows will have black bars at the side. With the content that has black bars at the side, the video image will be the same size as a 23" 16.9 monitor.

OliB9nrh.jpg

YdyoSF4h.jpg

pERq0eAh.jpg

1C8EgkEh.jpg

The majority of games also work well with the 21.9 aspect ratio. Some will have no problems at all where as others might have a few issues i.e. cut scenes & menus, the screen will go back to 16.9 so black bars at the side and some seem to cut of a bit at the top and bottom i.e. watch dogs, you should be able to see the menu completely but with this res./aspect ratio, you don't.

BpC3k6Xh.jpg

bKQ3dG0h.jpg

46f1Isah.jpg

tzkEEVWh.jpg

As you can probably tell from that last photo of BF 4, you also get more FOV at the sides, which is superb for vehicle gameplay, especially when flying jets. Not much of a MMORPG or racing gamer but I am sure that those sort of games would look even better on this monitor.

You can enable the 21.9 aspect ratio via file tweaks with most games that don't support the aspect ratio out of the box.

For more info. on which games do and don't support the 21.9 aspect ratio, check this thread out.

As for smoothness/response time, fast paced games i.e. battlefield 3 etc. they feel smoother on this monitor than my Dell U2311H and I can't see any blur, can't say that I feel at any disadvantage in these games, I still do well. Of course if you are a serious FPS gamer and don't mind not having the best image quality, colours etc. then you should be looking at TN 120Hz monitors.

I don't have the proper equipment to test the input lag, however, going by the AOC, ASUS and other newer LG 29" monitor reviews, the input lag should be 0-1ms. Not sure on the response time either, although in Linus's youtube review he says that he finds this monitor noticeably snappier than the 34UM95.

For general usage i.e. browsing, windows etc. I don't have any complaints about the 1080P vertical height res. I see some comments from people on a number of forums who regard it to be an "utterly stupid vertical height res.", true, you have to put in a lot more effort to scroll the middle mouse wheel a bit more often to see the next line...

You can easily watch a video plus read a web page on this ultrawide monitor. Three windows is a bit a too cramped for my liking.

8NTKBoLh.jpg

Now this is the only other area that is rather disappointing, the majority of youtube videos out there will have black borders all the way around the actual video i.e.

HMLf8u8h.jpg

There are quite a few videos, which support the 21.9 aspect ratio though.

0YlSbWrh.jpg

Conclusion:

All in all, I couldn't be happier. The monitor does everything I wanted. For any type of media and even general usage for browsing, 21.9 aspect ratio is superior to 16.9/16.10 in my opinion.

Films and games have that cinematic look now, which simply put, feels a lot more immersive than 16.9/16.10 aspect ratio monitors.

There are other 29" ultrawide monitors out there using the same panel but none of them ticked all the boxes like this LG model, we have the following:

AOC - stand looks really bad plus is sat too far forward (problem for me since my desk depth is already very small), build issues
Dell - would have been my choice due to their superb service and swap on door service (wouldn't have minded paying the extra £100 just for that), unfortunately the input lag is very high
ASUS - seems like the best screen all round for performance and image quality etc. but there are quite a few negative posts on their customer service/RMA, issues with build quality, no VESA mounting holes and a £100 more

So really the only area where LG could improve this monitor is; the stand, better QC and a matte plastic finish

Pros:

- good price considering what you get
- great image quality all round
- nicely laid out OSD with easy to use joystick

Cons:

- lottery as to if you will get a good one or not with regards to back light bleed i.e. QC testing is crap by LG
- glossy plastic finish

pERq0eAh.jpg
What movie is this please?
 
I've used the same 1/50s shutter at iso640

I've been attempting to use my rather crap digital camera to generate a photo I can use as a comparison to the fabled perfect monitor. It's nowhere near as configurable as your beast, so I've had to do my best to approximate it:

- The metadata of your images reports an f-stop of 1.8, so I've used that also - correct me if it's wrong.
- 1/50 at ISO640, converted to ISO100 (200+ is pretty grainy) is (50/640)*100 ~1/7.81s.
- My camera also seems to be fixed at f2.7. Using this and some trial and error, the closest I can achieve is 1/3.33s at f2.7 - roughly 4% lighter than 1/7.81s at f1.8.

At the end of all that, it seems that a 1/3.33s shutter at ISO100 will match your recent photographs closely enough for a comparison. That seem about right?
 
About right, A modern DSLR lens doesn't have an f/2.7 aperture but at f/2.8 to get the same exposure as my 1/50s shot at f/1.8 (ISO 640) you'd need to use 1/30s @ f/2.8 (ISO 100) on yours.

For anyone interested, I have the 34UM95 on sale in MM currently at £650. I will probably end up bundling the calibrator in with it...
 
Last edited:
Mrk - I missed all this ongoing saga with your big LG. Am I right in thinking you've ended up with 2!? I know you've had a shed load of hassle but once you sell the other screen you will have nabbed an £800 screen for about £300 effectively, is that right?
 
My knowledge of camera exposure is limited (... to what I was reading last night), so feel free to correct me. ISO640 is significantly more sensitive than ISO100, and f/1.8 lets in a lot more light than f/2.8. I'd expect much greater disparity in the shutter speed for the exposure to be equivalent. 1/50s to 1/30s doesn't seem like much. Am I missing something?


Also, if you were to sell the calibrator separately, I'd have it off you straight away.
 
Mrk - I missed all this ongoing saga with your big LG. Am I right in thinking you've ended up with 2!? I know you've had a shed load of hassle but once you sell the other screen you will have nabbed an £800 screen for about £300 effectively, is that right?

Essentially yes that is correct. Mr Heinz of LG Germany appears to have gone MIA though as he's yet to respond back to my thanks message! Hope the man is alright!

My knowledge of camera exposure is limited (... to what I was reading last night), so feel free to correct me. ISO640 is significantly more sensitive than ISO100, and f/1.8 lets in a lot more light than f/2.8. I'd expect much greater disparity in the shutter speed for the exposure to be equivalent. 1/50s to 1/30s doesn't seem like much. Am I missing something?


Also, if you were to sell the calibrator separately, I'd have it off you straight away.

Oops! I made a typo earlier, it should be 1/3s (0.3s) not 1/30s :o

You'd need to tripod shoot that slow of course to avoid any camera shake.

I did put the calibrator up on MM along with the monitor but I think the monitor has a better chance of selling if I did bundle the calibrator with it and forfeit the potential £20 gained selling it alone!
 
Back
Top Bottom